Relative quantification advantage

Block thermal cyclers are based on a conventional 96-well-plate format in a metal block combined with either a laser-induced fluorescence system or a LED/halogen lamp-based optical excitation source. Due to the usual thermal block time-temperature profiles, the ramp rates for cooling and heating are approximately 1.5 to 3°C/s, which results in an overall time of about 2 h for a typical PCR run of 45 cycles. Due to the 96-well-plate format, the usual pipetting and equipment can be used. Of particular interest for food analysis, in which relative quantification is often used, the numbers of reactions per run are of great importance. Therefore, those types of machines may have an advantage over the machine types described below. 

In general, two different strategies are possible for relative quantification (I) the relative standard curve method and (2) the comparative Ct method (AAC ). Depending on various factors, one method may be more appropriate than the other. The advantages of each method and factors to be considered are described below. 

The third advantage of quantitative real-time RT-PCR is that it allows one to monitor the treatment effect in individual patients as a potential surrogate marker after adjuvant chemotherapy (K3) or immunotherapy (S4) against micrometastatic diseases. For the purpose of monitoring, a relative quantification method which is designed to determine exact, PCR efficiency-corrected mRNA concentration, normalized to a calibrator, might be desirable to overcome the inter-assay variation from run to run (SI3). This may make it possible to directly compare the mRNA values at different time points. 

Resonant (R-) laser-SNMS [3.107-3.112] has almost all the advantages of SIMS, e-SNMS, and NR-laser-SNMS, with the additional advantage of using a resonance laser ionization process which selectively and efficiently ionizes the desired elemental species over a relatively large volume (Eig. 3.40 C). Eor over 80% of the elements in the periodic table, R-laser-SNMS has almost unity ionization efficiency over a large volume, so the overall efficiency is greater than that of NR-laser-SNMS. Quantification is also simpler because the unsaturated volume (where ionization is incom-... 

The use of volatile chemicals as systematic markers has the obvious advantage of lending itself to quantification through GLC. In many, if not most, of the cases discussed below, qualitative differences in monoterpene profiles would not have been sufficient to allow distinctions to be made between taxa, or even between individuals within a population. This is true because most conifers synthesize many of the same monoterpenes, although often in vastly different relative concentrations. It is these quantitative differences that have been constructively used in the following examples. Structures of the terpenes commonly studied are presented in Fig. 3.7. 

Table 8.76 shows the main characteristics of voltammetry. Trace-element analysis by electrochemical methods is attractive due to the low limits of detection that can be achieved at relatively low cost. The advantage of using standard addition as a means of calibration and quantification is that matrix effects in the sample are taken into consideration. Analytical responses in voltammetry sometimes lack the predictability of techniques such as optical spectrometry, mostly because interactions at electrode/solution interfaces can be extremely complex. The role of the electrolyte and additional solutions in voltammetry are crucial. Many determinations are pH dependent, and the electrolyte can increase both the conductivity and selectivity of the solution. Voltammetry offers some advantages over atomic absorption. It allows the determination of an element under different oxidation states (e.g. Fe2+/Fe3+). 

The selection of a technique to determine the concentration of a given element is often based on the availability of the instrumentation and the personal preferences of the analytical chemist. As a general rule, AAS is preferred when quantifications of only a few elements are required since it is easy to operate and is relatively inexpensive. A comparison of the detection limits that can be obtained by atomic spectroscopy with various atom reservoirs is contained in Table 8.1. These data show the advantages of individual techniques and also the improvements in detection limits that can be obtained with different atom reservoirs. 

Calibration and quantification procedures are easier in LA-ICP-MS compared to other solid-state mass spectrometric techniques because the laser ablation and the ICP ion source operate at normal pressure and the laser ablation of solid samples and ionization of analytes are separated in space and time. Therefore the advantage of solution calibration in ICP-MS can be applied in this solid-state analytical technique. The introduction of solution based calibration, which is only possible in LA-ICP-MS, was an innovative step in the development of this sensitive mass spectrometric technique. A number of different calibration approaches using aqueous standard solutions in the dual gas flow technique have been discussed by various authors.74 75 In the dual gas flow injection technique , the nebulized standard solution and the laser ablated sample material are mixed in the -piece and the two gas flows from the nebulizer (e.g. ultrasonic nebulizer) and laser ablation chamber are added. Using solution based calibration with the addition of a standard solution, Leach et alP determined minor elements in steel reference materials with a relative accuracy of a few %. In comparison to the so-called dual gas flow technique proposed in the literature, where the argon flow rates through the nebulizer and ablation cell add up to 11 min-1 (e.g. 0.451 min-1 and... 

Total protein assays have the advantage of being relatively straightforward compared to molecular-level analyses. Methods with fluorescence-based detection are also highly sensitive, and thus amenable direcdy to DON. Quantitative interpretation for environmental mixtures such as seawater, however, may be problematic for some samples. Most methods react with specific moieties (e.g., coomassie blue binds to lysine and arginine) and thus results obtained can depend on protein composition, size distribution, and even conformation (Sapan et ai, 1999), making the careful choice of calibration standards important. In addition, common components of natural samples, such as humic materials (e.g., Mayer et ai, 1986), carbohydrates (Sapan et ai, 1999), or NH3 may interfere with quantification. Overall, colorimetric methods can be very useful as quick, Hkely semi-quantitative estimates of total protein or peptide. However, potential biases inherent in the mechanism of a specific method should be considered before one is chosen, and appHcation of newer molecular assays (e.g., CBQCA) should be carefully examined in terms of natural sample matrix (Nunn et ai, 2003). 

---