Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reactivity prediction models

M. Braban, L. Pop, X. Willard and D. Horvath, Reactivity prediction models applied to the selection of novel candidate building blocks for high-throughput organic synthesis of combinatorial libraries, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 1999, 39(6), 1119. [Pg.180]

More precisely, the rate of ozone formation depends closely on the chemical nature of the hydrocarbons present in the atmosphere. A reactivity scale has been proposed by Lowi and Carter (1990) and is largely utilized today in ozone prediction models. Thus the values indicated in Table 5.26 express the potential ozone formation as O3 formed per gram of organic material initially present. The most reactive compounds are light olefins, cycloparaffins, substituted aromatic hydrocarbons notably the xylenes, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde. Inversely, normal or substituted paraffins. [Pg.261]

This chapter has outlined specifically how quantitative data on somewhat idealized reaction systems can be used as a basis for demonstrating the validity of our empirical electronic models in the field of reactivity. The multiparameter statistical models derived for the systems studied (PA, acidity, etc.) have limited direct application in EROS themselves. The next section develops the theme of applying the models in a much more general way, leading up to general reactivity prediction in EROS itself. [Pg.59]

The orbital coefficients obtained from Hiickel calculations predict the terminal position to be the most reactive one, while the AMI model predicts the Cl and C3 positions to be competitive. In polyenes, this is true for the addition of nucleophilic as well as electrophilic radicals, as HOMO and LUMO coefficients are basically identical. Both theoretical methods agree, however, in predicting the Cl position to be considerably more reactive as compared to the C2 position. It must be remembered in this context that FMO-based reactivity predictions are only relevant in kinetically controlled reactions. Under thermodynamic control, the most stable adduct will be formed which, for the case of polyenyl radicals, will most likely be the radical obtained by addition to the C1 position. [Pg.630]

In a reactive transport model, the domain of interest is divided into nodal blocks, as shown in Figure 2.11. Fluid enters the domain across one boundary, reacts with the medium, and discharges at another boundary. In many cases, reaction occurs along fronts that migrate through the medium until they either traverse it or assume a steady-state position (Lichtner, 1988). As noted by Lichtner (1988), models of this nature predict that reactions occur in the same sequence in space and time as they do in simple reaction path models. The reactive transport models, however, predict how the positions of reaction fronts migrate through time, provided that reliable input is available about flow rates, the permeability and dispersivity of the medium, and reaction rate constants. [Pg.21]

The mutagenic activity of A-acyloxy-A-alkoxyamides reflects their interaction with the primary target, which in this case is bacterial DNA. The predictive model (Equation 3) allows discovery of structural factors that either increase or diminish DNA damage. Such effects can operate either upon binding to DNA or reactivity with DNA. Both types of structural impacts have been observed. [Pg.106]

The simulated C02 fugacity matches the initial reservoir C02 content and indicates that the pH is buffered by C02-calcite equilibrium. Further modelling was carried out using the Geochemists Workbench React and Tact modules with the thermodynamic database modified to reflect the elevated P conditions and kinetic rate parameters consistent with the Waarre C mineralogy. The Waarre C shows low reactivity and short-term predictive modelling of the system under elevated C02 content changes little with time (Fig. 1). [Pg.153]

Given that interfacial solvation affects chemical transport/ surface reactivity and electron transfer/ and macromolecular self-assembly/ predictive models of solvent-solute interactions near surfaces will afford researchers deeper insights into a host of phenomena in biology, physics, and engineering. Research in this area should aid efforts to develop a general, experimentally tested, and quantitative understanding of solution-phase surface chemistry. [Pg.416]

Development of a predictive model for the reactivity of annelated benzenes is facilitated by the partitioning of substituent effects into their steric and electronic parameters. In order for this to be accomplished, reference reactions are needed which depend uniquely on one type of parameter. Typically conformational equilibria serve as good references of steric effects, whereas acid-base equilibria serve as good references of electronic effects. [Pg.212]

With this exception we can see that the impact of the configuration mixing model on nucleophilic substitution reactions, which constitute the most widely studied organic reaction, is indeed extensive. The model readily rationalizes much available experimental data, relates the entire mechanistic spectrum within a single framework, challenges some fundamental precepts of physical organic chemistry and enables one to make reactivity predictions about reactions yet to be investigated. For such a simple, qualitative theory, this is no mean achievement. [Pg.161]

There are several properties of a chemical that are related to exposure potential or overall reactivity for which structure-based predictive models are available. The relevant properties discussed here are bioaccumulation, oral, dermal, and inhalation bioavailability and reactivity. These prediction methods are based on a combination of in vitro assays and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) [3]. QSARs are simple, usually linear, mathematical models that use chemical structure descriptors to predict first-order physicochemical properties, such as water solubility. Other, similar models can then be constructed that use the first-order physicochemical properties to predict more complex properties, including those of interest here. Chemical descriptors are properties that can be calculated directly from a chemical structure graph and can include abstract quantities, such as connectivity indices, or more intuitive properties, such as dipole moment or total surface area. QSAR models are parameterized using training data from sets of chemicals for which both structure and chemical properties are known, and are validated against other (independent) sets of chemicals. [Pg.23]

For the n-butenes the activation energy profile shows no difference among the top of the barriers linking the three isomers (Table II). According to the model the theoretical selectivities determined only by the statistical factors should be k2i/kn ku/h2 kn/k2S = 1 3 3. The corresponding experimental selectivities were 1.2 2.9 2.4 and were temperature independent. The relative reactivities predicted by the model compared with those found experimentally are 1-butene cis-2-butene ran -2-butene = 1.0 (0.38 0.06) (0.12 0.03) vs. 1 0.37 0.18, respectively. [Pg.556]

A reactive dispersion model proposed by Muller et al. [37] predicts a change of speed if the tracer impulse consists of reactants, which react at the walls of the channel (Figs. 4.29 and 4.30). Brenner found a quite fascinating explanation for... [Pg.118]

The examples discussed above illustrate that reactivity and stereoselectivity are subject to numerous, often subtle, influences. Continuous improvements in molecular modeling have enabled clarification of many, previously unexplained observations in the future even solvent effects might, perhaps, be taken into account. Predictive models based on such calculations should, however, always be substantiated by experimental data. [Pg.30]

As a point of analytical and environmental interest, Hg is more readily measured in natural waters than MMHg. Since the in situ production of MMHg and Hg° is proportional to the supply of reactive mercury, a comprehensive understanding of the aqueous Hg° cycle and its temporal and spatial patterns may provide a means to constrain and improve predictive models for the aquatic and atmospheric biogeochemistry of mercury and MMHg in natural waters. For a sense of the potential geochemical benefits from automated Hg° measurements, the reader is referred to some recent field studies of Hg° (e.g., Lindberg et al., 2000 Amyot et al., 2001 Balcom et al., 2000). [Pg.4668]

Laboratory experiments, transport modeling, field data, and engineering cost analysis provide complementary information to be used in an assessment of the viability of an MNA approach for a site. Information from kinetic sorption/ desorption experiments, selective extraction experiments, reactive transport modeling, and historical case analyses of plumes at several UMTRA sites can be used to establish a framework for evaluation of MNA for uranium contamination (Brady et al, 1998, 2002 Bryan and Siegel, 1998 Jove-Colon et al, 2001). The results of a recent project conducted at the Hanford 100-N site provided information for evaluation of MNA for a °Sr plume that has reached the Columbia River (Kelley et al, 2002). The study included strontium sorption-desorption studies, strontium transport and hydrologic modeling of the near-river system, and evaluation of the comparative costs and predicted effectiveness of alternative remediation strategies. [Pg.4787]

Turbulence is the most complicated kind of fluid motion. There have been several different attempts to understand turbulence and different approaches taken to develop predictive models for turbulent flows. In this chapter, a brief description of some of the concepts relevant to understand turbulence, and a brief overview of different modeling approaches to simulating turbulent flow processes is given. Turbulence models based on time-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, which are the most relevant for chemical reactor engineers, at least for the foreseeable future, are then discussed in detail. The scope of discussion is restricted to single-phase turbulent flows (of Newtonian fluids) without chemical reactions. Modeling of turbulent multiphase flows and turbulent reactive flows are discussed in Chapters 4 and 5 respectively. [Pg.58]


See other pages where Reactivity prediction models is mentioned: [Pg.180]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.2184]    [Pg.1078]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.845]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.1940]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.5048]    [Pg.5066]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.180 ]




SEARCH



Modeling Predictions

Modelling predictive

Modelling reactivity

Prediction model

Predictive models

Reactivity, prediction

© 2024 chempedia.info