Surface catalytic reaction

The surface work fiincdon is fonnally defined as the minimum energy needed m order to remove an electron from a solid. It is often described as being the difference in energy between the Fenni level and the vacuum level of a solid. The work ftmction is a sensitive measure of the surface electronic structure, and can be measured in a number of ways, as described in section B 1.26.4. Many processes, such as catalytic surface reactions or resonant charge transfer between ions and surfaces, are critically dependent on the work ftmction. 

A tremendous amount of work has been done to delineate the detailed reaction mechanisms for many catalytic reactions on well characterized surfaces [1, 45]. Many of tiiese studies involved impinging molecules onto surfaces at relatively low pressures, and then interrogating the surfaces in vacuum with surface science teclmiques. For example, a usefiil technique for catalytic studies is TPD, as the reactants can be adsorbed onto the sample in one step, and the products fonned in a second step when the sample is heated. Note that catalytic surface studies have also been perfonned by reacting samples in a high-pressure cell, and then returning them to vacuum for measurement. 

Recently, in situ studies of catalytic surface chemical reactions at high pressures have been undertaken [46, 47]. These studies employed sum frequency generation (SFG) and STM in order to probe the surfaces as the reactions are occurring under conditions similar to those employed for industrial catalysis (SFG is a laser-based teclmique that is described in section A 1.7.5.5 and section BT22). These studies have shown that the highly stable adsorbate sites that are probed under vacuum conditions are not necessarily tlie same sites that are active in high-pressure catalysis. Instead, less stable sites that are only occupied at high pressures are often responsible for catalysis. Because the active... 

The study of catalytic reactions using surface science teclmiques has been fniithil over the last 30 years. Great strides have been made towards understanding the fiindamentals of catalytic reactions, particularly by... 

The reaction proceeds until aU. available monomer has reacted or until it is terminated by an acidic species. The gel point in these m situ polymerizations, as represented by the time of fixture, occurs within several seconds on strongly catalytic surfaces such as thermoset mbbers to several minutes on noncatalytic surfaces. 

Among toxic pollutants that may enter the environment, hydraziae is one of the less persistent because it reacts with oxygen and ozone, particularly in the presence of catalytic surfaces such as metals, oxides, etc. The final products of these reactions are innocuous nitrogen and water. 

Surface Area. This property is of paramount importance to catalyst performance because in general catalyst activity increases as the surface area of the catalyst increases. However because some reaction rates are strongly dependent on the nature of the stmcture of the catalytic surface, a linear correlation of catalyst activity with surface area should not be expected. As the catalyst surface area increases, for many reactions the selectivity of the catalyst is found to decrease. If the support material is completely inert to the reactants and products, this effect may be diminished somewhat. 

Reactions that are catalyzed by solids occur on the surfaces of the solids at points of high chemical activity. Therefore, the activity of a catalytic surface is proportional to the number of active centers per unit area. In many cases, the concentration of active centers is relatively low. This is evident by the small quantities of poisons present (material that retards the rate of a catalytic reaction) that are sufficient to destroy the activity of a catalyst. Active centers depend on the interatomic spacing of the solid structure, chemical constitution, and lattice structure. 

K. M. Khan, K. Yaldram, A. Ahmad. Kinetics of a dimer-dimer irreversible catalytic surface reaction. J Chem Phys (in press). 

One problem with heterogeneous catalysis is that the solid catalyst is easily poisoned. Foreign materials deposited on the catalytic surface during the reaction reduce or even destroy its effectiveness. A major reason for using unleaded gasoline is that lead metal poisons the Pt-Rh mixture in the catalytic converter. 

As our first approach to the model, we considered the controlling step to be the mass transfer from gas to liquid, the mass transfer from liquid to catalyst, or the catalytic surface reaction step. The other steps were eliminated since convective transport with small catalyst particles and high local mixing should offer virtually no resistance to the overall reaction scheme. Mathematical models were constructed for each of these three steps. 

The results obtained showed, again, that the form of the rate equations and the values of their constants, obtained by the study of isolated reactions, are valid also in the coupled system. This was also confirmed by the observed agreement between the calculated and the experimental integral data (94)- Kinetic results and the analysis of the effect of reaction products revealed that adsorption of the reaction components was competitive and that all the compounds involved in the three reactions were adsorbed on the same sites of the catalytic surface. 

From the results of this kinetic study and from the values of the adsorption coefficients listed in Table IX, it can be judged that both reactions of crotonaldehyde as well as the reaction of butyraldehyde proceed on identical sites of the catalytic surface. The hydrogenation of crotyl alcohol and its isomerization, which follow different kinetics, most likely proceed on other sites of the surface. From the form of the integral experimental dependences in Fig. 9 it may be assumed, for similar reasons as in the hy-drodemethylation of xylenes (p. 31) or in the hydrogenation of phenol, that the adsorption or desorption of the reaction components are most likely faster processes than surface reactions. 

From the study of the influencing of single reactions by products and by other added substances and from the analysis of mutual influencing of reactions in coupled systems, the following conclusions can be drawn concerning adsorption of the reaction components. (1) With the exception of crotyl alcohol on the platinum-iron-silica gel catalyst, all the substances present in the coupled system, i.e. reactants, intermediate products, and final products, always adsorbed on the same sites of the catalytic surface (competitive adsorption). This nonspecificity was established also in our other studies (see Section IV.F.2) and was stated also by, for example, Smith and Prater (32), (2) The adsorption of starting reactants and the desorption of the intermediate and final products appeared in our studies always as faster, relative to the rate of chemical transformations of adsorbed substances on the surface of the catalyst. 

Copper oxide, oxidation of CO over, 86 Coupled heterogeneous catalytic reactions, kinetics of, 1-49, see also Kinetics coupling through catalytic surface, 9-13 experimental studies, 22-49 apparatus and procedure, 25, 26 catalysts, 26-28... 

The elucidation of the X-ray structure of chymotrypsin (Ref. 1) and in a later stage of subtilisin (Ref. 2) revealed an active site with three crucial groups (Fig. 7.1)-the active serine, a neighboring histidine, and a buried aspartic acid. These three residues are frequently called the catalytic triad, and are designated here as Aspc Hisc Serc (where c indicates a catalytic residue). The identification of the location of the active-site groups and intense biochemical studies led to several mechanistic proposals for the action of serine proteases (see, for example, Refs. 1 and 2). However, it appears that without some way of translating the structural information to reaction-potential surfaces it is hard to discriminate between different alternative mechanisms. Thus it is instructive to use the procedure introduced in previous chapters and to examine the feasibility of different... 

The development of new and improved catalysts requires advances in our understanding of how to make catalysts with specified properties the relationships between surface stracture, composition, and catalytic performance the dynamics of chemical reactions occurring at a catalyst surface the deployment of catalytic surface within supporting microstracture and the dynamics of transport to and from that surface. Research opportmuties for chemical engineers are evident in four areas catalyst synthesis, characterization of surface stracture, surface chemistry, and design. 

Reaction between adsorbed components on the catalytic surface. 

When the selectivity of a reaction is controlled by differences in the way molecules are activated on different sites, the probability of the presence of different sites becomes important. An example again can be taken from the activation of CO. For methanation, activation of the CO bond is essential. This will proceed with low barriers at step-edge-type sites. If one is interested in the production of methanol, catalytic surfaces are preferred, which do not allow for easy CO dissociation. This will typically be the case for terrace sites. The selectivity of the reaction to produce methanol will then be given by an expression as in Eq. (1.29a) ... 

Catalytic reactors can roughly be classified as random and structured reactors. In random reactors, catalyst particles are located in a chaotic way in the reaction zone, no matter how carefully they are packed. It is not surprising that this results in a nonuniform fiow over the cross-section of the reaction zone, leading to a nonuniform access of reactants to the outer catalyst surface and, as a consequence, undesired concentration and temperature profiles. Not surprisingly, this leads, in general, to lower yield and selectivity. In structured reactors, the catalyst is of a well-defined spatial structure, which can be designed in more detail. The hydrodynamics can be simplified to essentially laminar, well-behaved uniform fiow, enabling full access of reactants to the catalytic surface at a low pressure drop. 

Whitaker, S, Transient Diffusion, Adsorption and Reaction in Porous Catalysts The Reaction Controlled, Quasi-Steady Catalytic Surface, Chemical Engineering Science 41, 3015, 1986. 

The performance of various solvents can be explained with the help of the role of these solvents in the reaction. These solvents help in keeping teth benzene and hydrogen peroxide in one phase. This helps in the easy transport of both the reactants to the active sites of the catalyst. The acetonitrile, and acetone adsorption data on these catalysts (Fig. 6), suggests that acetonitrile has a greater affinity to the catalytic surface than acetone. There by acetonitrile is more effective in transporting the reactants to the catalyst active sites. At the same time, they also help the products in desorbing and vacating the active sites. 

The characteristic times on which catalytic events occur vary more or less in parallel with the different length scales discussed above. The activation and breaking of a chemical bond inside a molecule occurs in the picosecond regime, completion of an entire reaction cycle from complexation between catalyst and reactants through separation from the product may take anywhere between microseconds for the fastest enzymatic reactions to minutes for complicated reactions on surfaces. On the mesoscopic level, diffusion in and outside pores, and through shaped catalyst particles may take between seconds and minutes, and the residence times of molecules inside entire reactors may be from seconds to, effectively, infinity if the reactants end up in unwanted byproducts such as coke, which stay on the catalyst. 

In Chapter 1 we emphasized that the properties of a heterogeneous catalyst surface are determined by its composition and structure on the atomic scale. Hence, from a fundamental point of view, the ultimate goal of catalyst characterization should be to examine the surface atom by atom under the reaction conditions under which the catalyst operates, i.e. in situ. However, a catalyst often consists of small particles of metal, oxide, or sulfide on a support material. Chemical promoters may have been added to the catalyst to optimize its activity and/or selectivity, and structural promoters may have been incorporated to improve the mechanical properties and stabilize the particles against sintering. As a result, a heterogeneous catalyst can be quite complex. Moreover, the state of the catalytic surface generally depends on the conditions under which it is used. 

We have already mentioned that fundamental studies in catalysis often require the use of single crystals or other model systems. As catalyst characterization in academic research aims to determine the surface composition on the molecular level under the conditions where the catalyst does its work, one can in principle adopt two approaches. The first is to model the catalytic surface, for example with that of a single crystal. By using the appropriate combination of surface science tools, the desired characterization on the atomic scale is certainly possible in favorable cases. However, although one may be able to study the catalytic properties of such samples under realistic conditions (pressures of 1 atm or higher), most of the characterization is necessarily carried out in ultrahigh vacuum, and not under reaction conditions. 

---