Random-effects statistical model

Data were analyzed with a model accounting for Birth Weight Category (B WC, lUGR vs. Nomial), Dietary Fat (DF, LF vs. HF) and their interaction (BWC xDF) as fixed effects and animal as random effect. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05 for main effects. 

Use of random flight statistics to derive rg for the coil assumes the individual segments exclude no volume from one another. While physically unrealistic, this assumption makes the derivation mathematically manageable. Neglecting this volume exclusion means that coil dimensions are underestimated by the random fight model, but this effect can be offset by applying the result to a solvent in which polymer-polymer contacts are somewhat favored over polymer-solvent contacts. 

In the next paper [160], Villain discussed the model in which the local impurities are to some extent treated in the same fashion as in the random field Ising model, and concluded, in agreement with earlier predictions for RFIM [165], that the commensurate, ordered phase is always unstable, so that the C-IC transition is destroyed by impurities as well. The argument of Villain, though presented only for the special case of 7 = 0, suggests that at finite temperatures the effects of impurities should be even stronger, due to the presence of strong statistical fluctuations in two-dimensional systems which further destabilize the commensurate phase. 

By its random nature, turbulence does not lend itself easily to modelling starting from the differential equations for fluid flow (Navier-Stokes). However, a remarkably successful statistical model due to Kolmogorov has proven very useful for modelling the optical effects of the atmosphere. 

Data used to describe variation are ideally representative of some population of risk assessment interest. Representativeness was a focus of an earlier workshop on selection of distributions (USEPA 1998). The role of problem formulation is emphasized. In case of representativeness issues, some adjustment of the data may be possible, perhaps based on a mechanistic or statistical model. Statistical random-effects models may be useful in situations where the model includes distributions among as well as within populations. However, simple approaches may be adequate, depending on the assessment tier, such as an attempt to characterize quantitatively the consequences of assuming the data to be representative. 

With regard to relevant statistical methodologies, it is possible to dehne 2 situations, which can be termed a meta-analysis context and a shrinkage estimation context. Similar statistical models, in particular random-effects models, may be applicable in both situations. However, the results of such a model will be used somewhat differently. 

Methods of statistical meta-analysis may be useful for combining information across studies. There are 2 principal varieties of meta-analytic estimation (Normand 1995). In a hxed-effects analysis the observed variation among estimates is attributable to the statistical error associated with the individual estimates. An important step is to compute a weighted average of unbiased estimates, where the weight for an estimate is computed by means of its standard error estimate. In a random-effects analysis one allows for additional variation, beyond statistical error, making use of a htted random-effects model. 

There is a growing literature that addresses the transferability of a study s pooled results to subgroups. Approaches include evaluation of the homogeneity of different centers and countries results use of random effects models to borrow information from the pooled results when deriving center-specific or country-specific estimates direct statistical inference by use of net monetary benefit regression and use of decision analysis. 

Perform randomized experiments according to statistical model Calculate effects of each factor and test for statistical significance... 

The algorithm used is attributed to J. B. J. Read. For many manipulations on large matrices it is only practical for use with a fairly large computer. The data are arranged in two matrices by sample i and nuclide j one matrix, V, contains the amount of each nuclide in each sample the other matrix, E, contains the variances of these numbers, as estimated from counting statistics, agreement between replicate analyses, and known analytical errors. It is also possible to add an arbitrary term Fik to each variance to account for random effects between samples not considered in the model this is usually done in terms of an additional fractional error. Zeroes are inserted for missing data in cases in which not all nuclides were measured in every sample. 

Use the data in Section 13.9.7 (these are the Grunfeld data) to fit the random and fixed effects models. There are five films and 20 years of data for each. Use the F, LM, and/or Hausman statistics to detennine which model, the fixed or random effects model, is preferable for these data. 

The F and LM statistics are not useful for comparing the fixed and random effects models. The Hausman statistic can be used. The value appears above. Since the Hausman statistic is small (only 3.14 with two degrees of freedom), we conclude that the GLS estimator is consistent. The statistic would be large if the two estimates were significantly different. Since they are not, we conclude that the evidence favors the random effects model. 

In such statistically designed experiments one wants to exclude the random effects of a limited number of features by varying them systematically, i.e. by variation of the so-called factors. At the same time the order in which the experiments are performed should be randomized to avoid systematic errors in experimentation. In another basic type of experiment, sequential experiments, the set-up of an experiment depends on the results obtained from previous experiments. For help in deciding which design is preferable, see Section 3.6. In principle, statistical design is one recommendation of how to perform the experiments. The design should always be based on an exact question or on a working hypothesis. These in turn are often based on models. 

Beyond pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, population modeling and parameter estimation are applications of a statistical model that has general validity, the nonlinear mixed effects model. The model has wide applicability in all areas, in the biomedical science and elsewhere, where a parametric functional relationship between some input and some response is studied and where random variability across individuals is of concern [458]. 

The B score (Brideau et al., 2003) is a robust analog of the Z score after median polish it is more resistant to outliers and also more robust to row- and column-position related systematic errors (Table 14.1). The iterative median polish procedure followed by a smoothing algorithm over nearby plates is used to compute estimates for row and column (in addition to plate) effects that are subtracted from the measured value and then divided by the median absolute deviation (MAD) of the corrected measures to robustly standardize for the plate-to-plate variability of random noise. A similar approach uses a robust linear model to obtain robust estimates of row and column effects. After adjustment, the corrected measures are standardized by the scale estimate of the robust linear model fit to generate a Z statistic referred to as the R score (Wu, Liu, and Sui, 2008). In a related approach to detect and eliminate systematic position-dependent errors, the distribution of Z score-normalized data for each well position over a screening run or subset is fitted to a statistical model as a function of the plate the resulting trend is used to correct the data (Makarenkov et al., 2007). 

A statistical methodology that is particularly relevant where experimentation is meant to identify important unregulated sources of variation in a response is that of variance component estimation, based on so-called ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA) calculations and random effects models. As an example of what is possible, consider the data of Table 5.6 Shown here are copper content measurements for some bronze castings. Two copper content determinations were made on each of two physical specimens cut from each of 11 different castings. 

Inference effects relate to systematic and random errors in modelling inducing problems of drawing extrapolations or logic deductions from small statistical samples, from animal data or experimental data onto humans or from large doses to small doses, etc. All of these are usually expressed through statistical confidence intervals ... 

Davidian, M. Gallant, A.R. The non-linear mixed effects model with a smooth random effects density. In Institute of Statistics Mimeo Series No. 2206 North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC, 1992. 

The main statistical issue is the choice between fixed effects and random effects models. Fleiss describes and discusses the two approaches in detail. Peto argues for the former as being assumption-free, as it is based just on the studies being considered at the time of analysis. This assumes that the same true statement effect underlies the apparent effect seen in each trial, study to study variation being due to sampling error. On the other... 

Statistical treatments. The data were processed with the SAS statistical package version 6.11, 4 edition (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). ANOVA analyses were performed at level a = 0.05, according to the model attribute = product + subject + product x subject, with subject as a random effect. Means were compared with the Newman - Keuls multiple comparison test (Student t... 

Estimating the Mean Prediction Error with Two Random Effects Another approach to estimating the mean prediction error that accounts for multiple observations in the same individual has recently been proposed. Here the Cl is constructed under the statistical model... 

Unlike the individual model discussed above, a more elaborate statistical model is required to deal with sparse PK data. In formulating the model, it is recognized that overall variability in the measured (response) data in a sample of individuals reflects both measurement error and intersubject variability. The observed response (e.g., concentration) in an individual within the framework of population (regression) nonlinear random mixed effects models can be described as... 

---