Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Standard robustness

Broadly speaking, this model seeks to predict temperature and species concentrations, in both the gas and solid phases, as a function of time and axial position along the monolith length. The numerical solution method employed involves a uniform-mesh spatial discretization and subsequent time-integration for the PDE using a standard, robust software (such as LSODI found in ODEPACK), and x-integration by LSODl for the DAE system [6]. [Pg.14]

Optimization problems in crystallographic structure refinement are seldom convex, that is very rarely characterized by a unimodal function/(x). Regularization of a two-atom model is an example of such a unimodal function. Fig. 11.2a. in contrast. Fig. 11.2b shows a profile of a function for modelling an amino acid side chain - the peaks correspond to the possible rotamers. In this case, the shape of the function/(x) is called multimodal. Such functions arise naturally in structural macromolecular optimization problems and possess a highly complex multiminima energy landscape that does not lend itself favourably to standard robust optimization techniques. [Pg.157]

Environmental vulnerability varies considerably from area to area. For example the North Sea, which is displaced into the Atlantic over a two year period,-is a much more robust area than the Caspian Sea which is enclosed. Regional standards should reflect those differences. [Pg.70]

The standard Galerkin technique provides a flexible and powerful method for the solution of problems in areas such as solid mechanics and heat conduction where the model equations arc of elliptic or parabolic type. It can also be used to develop robust schemes for the solution of the governing equations of... [Pg.53]

Specialized equipment for industrial measurements and automatic control have been developed (18) (see Process control). In general, the pH of an industrial process need not be controlled with great accuracy. Consequendy, frequent standardization of the cell assembly may be uimecessary. On the other hand, the ambient conditions, eg, temperature and humidity, under which the industrial control measurements are made, may be such that the pH meter must be much more robust than those intended for laboratory use. To avoid costiy downtime for repairs, pH instmments may be constmcted of modular units, permitting rapid removal and replacement of a defective subssembly. [Pg.468]

Robustness of methods based on broad-on-nar row approach (one of narrow standar ds is used as broad standard for correction of calibration function) is higher but some disadvantages also are observed. [Pg.345]

In this work there is proposed approach which allows using broad standar ds for calibration and system suitability test. The approach is based on main principle of using of standards i.e. maximal closeness of tested sample and standar d. It has been shoved that the approach allows achieving essential improvement of robustness of method for determination of MWD of dextrans. [Pg.345]

All equipment should comply with the relevant British and other Standards regarding dimensions, methods of determining ratings, compliance with safety regulations, robustness and general quality of manufacture [70]. BS.5750, Quality Systems, concentrates on the subject of product quality as it affects design, manufacture and installation. In addition to Standards, there are various Codes of Practice [71, 72]. [Pg.365]

The standard deviation, Sj, is the most commonly used measure of dispersion. Theoretically, the parent population from which the n observations are drawn must meet the criteria set down for the normal distribution (see Section 1.2.1) in practice, the requirements are not as stringent, because the standard deviation is a relatively robust statistic. The almost universal implementation of the standard deviation algorithm in calculators and program packages certainly increases the danger of its misapplication, but this is counterbalanced by the observation that the consistent use of a somewhat inappropriate statistic can also lead to the right conclusions. [Pg.17]

Firstly, there are technical reasons concerning catalyst and reactor requirements. In the chemical industry, catalyst performance is critical. Compared to conventional catalysts, they are relatively expensive and catalyst production and standardization lag behind. In practice, a robust, proven catalyst is needed. For a specific application, an extended catalyst and washcoat development program is unavoidable, and in particular, for the fine chemistry in-house development is a burden. For coated systems, catalyst loading is low, making them unsuited for reactions occurring in the kinetic regime, which is particularly important for bulk chemistry and refineries. In that case, incorporated monolithic catalysts are the logical choice. Catalyst stability is crucial. It determines the amount of catalyst required for a batch process, the number of times the catalyst can be reused, and for a continuous process, the run time. [Pg.203]

Verification implies that the laboratory investigates trueness and precision in particular. Elements which should be included in a full validation of an analytical method are specificity, calibration curve, precision between laboratories and/or precision within laboratories, trueness, measuring range, LOD, LOQ, robustness and sensitivity. The numbers of analyses required by the NMKL standard and the criteria for the adoption of quantitative methods are summarized in Table 10. [Pg.121]

It is often difficult to define where sample extraction ends and cleanup procedures begin. Sample extracts may be injected directly into a gas or liquid chromatograph in certain cases, but this will be dependent on the analyte, sample matrix, injection, separation and detection system, and the limit of determination (LOD) which is required. It is also more likely that matrix-matched calibration standards will be needed in order to obtain robust quantitative data if no cleanup steps are employed. [Pg.734]

There is little doubt on the basis of the above review that speleothems are useful in an extremely wide range of applications and the frequency of publications devoted to speleothem-based archives is increasing rapidly. Fundamental to all applications is a robust and high-precision chronology and uranium-series techniques currently set the standard in this regard for speleothems. Reliable ages can be obtained for most samples where material appears to be well-preserved. However, it will become increasingly important to demonstrate reliability as the spatial resolution of analysis improves further. [Pg.449]


See other pages where Standard robustness is mentioned: [Pg.79]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.1474]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.702]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.547]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.131 ]




SEARCH



Robust

Robustness

Standard deviation robust

© 2024 chempedia.info