Fixed effects

Quahtative variables can be broken down into two categories. The first consists of those variables whose specific effects ate to be compared directiy eg, comparison of the effect on performance of two proposed preparation methods or of three catalyst types. The requited number of conditions for such variables is generally evident. Such variables are sometimes referred to as fixed effects or Type I variables. 

The normal sequence of addition ia the dyeiag process is pulps, filler, dyestuffs, rosia size, and alum. The dyestuffs are either taken up by the fiber because of their affinity or they must be fixed on the fiber in a finely divided form by suitable fixing agents. Alum, which is required to precipitate the rosin size, has a strong precipitating and fixing effect on dyestuffs. 

In the PNLS step the current estimates of D and are fixed and the conditional modes of the random effects b and the conditional estimates of the fixed effects p are obtained minimizing the following objective function ... 

The process rnust be iterated until convergence and the final estimates are denoted with Plb, bi,LB, and colb- The individual regression parameter can be therefore estimated by replacing the final fixed effects and random effects estimates in the function g so that ... 

Power Analysis for ANOVA Designs can be used to calculate sample size for one and two-way factorial designs with fixed effects http //evall.crc.uiuc.e du/ fp o wer. html/... 

Although formaldehyde penetrates very quickly, its protein cross-linking fixative effects are not as immediate. Modifications to this and improvements on the model used originally in studies by Baker et al.,7 Fox et al.,8 and Helander9 have demonstrated that in tissue and in these more complex models, the penetration and therefore Medawar s constant for formaldehyde is not as great as 5.5 and is probably more like 3.6.7... 

Adequate data were available for development of the three AEGL classifications. Inadequate data were available for determination of the relationship between concentration and time for a fixed effect. Based on the observations that (1) blood concentrations in humans rapidly approach equilibrium with negligible metabolism and tissue uptake and (2) the end point of cardiac sensitization is a blood-concentration related threshold phenomenon, the same concentration was used across all AEGL time periods for the respective AEGL classifications. 

There are two common methods for obtaining estimates of the fixed effects (the mean) and the variability the two-stage approach and the nonlinear, mixed-effects modeling approach. The two-stage approach involves multiple measurements on each subject. The nonlinear, mixed-effects model can be used in situations where extensive measurements cannot or will not be made on all or any of the subjects. 

The PD models fall under two categories graded or quantal of fixed-effect model. Graded refers to a continuous response at different concentrations, whereas the quantal model would evaluate discrete response such as dead or alive, desired or undesired and are almost invariably clinical end points. 

The isobole method is widely used to evaluate the effects of binary mixmres. However, a large number of different mixtures of the two compounds have to be tested in order to identify combinations that produce the fixed effect. 

Lag periods Fixed-effect model Random-effect model Hausman test... 

Results based on both fixed effects and random effects, with P-values from the Hausman tests, are shown in Table 13.2. The Hausman tests indicated that, in this context, a random-effect framework was more appropriate. 

The Hausman test was used to test the null hypothesis that the coefficients estimated by the efficient random-effect model are the same as the ones estimated by the consistent fixed-effect model. If this null hypothesis cannot be rejected (insignificant P-value in general, it is larger than 0.05), then the random-effect model is more appropriate. 

The fixed effects model considers the studies that have been combined as the totality of all the studies conducted. An alternative approach considers the collection of studies included in the meta-analysis as a random selection of the studies that have been conducted or a random selection of those that could have been conducted. This results in a slightly changed methodology, termed the random effects model The mathematics for the two models is a little different and the reader is referred to Fleiss (1993), for example, for further details. The net effect, however, of using a random effects model is to produce a slightly more conservative analysis with wider confidence intervals. 

In the remainder of this section we will concentrate on the fixed effects approach, which is probably the more common and appropriate approach, within the pharmaceutical setting. 

Suppose that a response surface design has been run with n design variables, Xj, x, x, ..., x , and m environmental variables, z, z, z, ..., z. During the experiment the environmental variables are controlled at fixed levels and can be regarded as fixed effects. Suppose that the x s and z s are centered and scaled around 0. In this section, several alternative models for the relationship between the design and environmental variables and the response will be considered. 

The purpose of the Model I ANOVA is to decompose each result as yij=iu+aj+eij where // is the population mean, aj the effect of group j and eij the randomly distributed error or residual. Significance in a fixed effect... 

The subordinate level of a nested ANOVA is always Model II (random effect model). The highest level of classification of a nested ANOVA may be Model I (fixed effect model) or Model II. If it is Model II it is called a pure Model II nested ANOVA. If the highest level is Model I it is called a mixed model nested ANOVA. 

---