Radioactivity containment

Containment of radioactivity in the incineration system shall be ensured by equipment boundaries (static barrier) and by maintaining negative pressure in the equipment (dynamic barrier). Negative pressure in the incinerator building shall provide an additional (secondary) dynamic barrier against the spread of contamination from the facility proper to the environment. 

Generic block diagram of an incineration system for radioactive wastes. 

The total system shall be maintained under negative pressure at all times with respect to the building, to enhance the effectiveness of the static barrier for preventing the dispersion of radioactive materials into the incinerator building in the event of an accidental leak in the equipment. This dynamic barrier is provided by the incineration system s exhaust or induced draught fan. When a positive pressure is essential as a process requirement in a part of the incineration system, special precautions shall be taken to ensure that leakage beyond the static barrier cannot occur. 

The pressure in the incinerator building shall also be kept negative with respect to the environment, to prevent the spread of contamination into the environ-nient in the event of a failure of any of the primary (static or dynamic) barriers. The building should be exhausted into the ventilation system of the building, which incorporates radioactivity control equipment. 

In the event of equipment maintenance or remedial work, it may be deemed impractical to maintain negative pressure reliably within the whole or within part of the incineration system. These events shall be taken into account in the design of the facility to permit an application of special (temporary) provisions for radioactivity containment. 

---

Sacket WM, Mo T, Spalding RF, Exner ME (1973) A revaluation of the marine geochemistry of uranium. Symposium on the interaction of radioactive containments with the constituents of the marine... 

FIGURE 9.15 Design of a SI separation system for on-line separation of actinides for ICP-MS detection, where the SI system handles clean solutions and reagents outside the radioactivity containment glove box, while the injection valve and separation column downstream handle radioactive solutions. 

Therefore, if the absolute radioactivity contained by a sample is to be accurately known, both the observed counting rate and the efficiency must be precisely determined. 

Transfer the filters to scintillation vials and add 5 to 10 ml scintillation fluid. Determine the amount of radioactivity contained in each vial only after a 16 to 24 hour incubation period. 

Percentage of radioactivity contained in the AERx dosage form or ex-valve dose for the MDI. 

RadioilPLC revealed the presence of R 28 644, the parent substance, and R 33 277, its isomeric triazole analogue, in the soil extracts. The ratio of 1,2,4-triazole 1,3,4-triazole remained virtually unchanged during the whole incubation period and equal to that of the C-synthesis product. No transformation products reached levels exceeding 1.0% of the extracted radioactivity. A typical radio-HPLC elution profile of a soil extract is ven in Fig. 4. At t = 300 days, the extracted radioactivity contained 97.4% azaconazole (RT = 36.16 min), 2.3% R 33 277 (RT = 34.91 min), and 0.3% of an unknown transformation product. 

Following an incubation at the time and temperature appropriate to each assay, reactions are terminated in order to separate L not bound to the R. This is done using one of two methods, centrifugation or filtration. In the former, the incubation mixtures are centrifuged at high speed (e.g., 50 000 10 min) to pellet the tissue. The incubation solution is decanted and the pellet is washed rapidly with 5-10 ml of ice-cold assay buffer. The pellet is dissolved in tissue solubilizers, scintillant is added, and the radioactivity contained in the pellet is counted using scintillation spectrophotometry. 

Transmutation and isolation of radioactivity containment of radioactive materials in time and space. 

In a pressurized water reactor, the steam generator heating tubes represent the barrier between the radioactivity-containing primary coolant and the secondary-side water-steam circuit, which usually is free of radioactivity. In the event of a... 

To make it possible to assess the containment capacity of the packages and siq>ply the materials necessary for the demonstration of safety and, on the odier hand, to estimate the effect of the packages on the containment capacity of the other barriers, these data should be conq>leted by properties of the packages, particularly those associated with their initial radioactive containment capacity and their evolution ... 

The process can be carried out by running a solution of ammonium nitrate into the nuclear reactor, where it is exposed to neutrons. The carbon that is made in this way is in the form of the hydrogen carbonate ion, HCO.3", and it can be precipitated as barium carbonate by adding barium hydroxide solution. The samples of radioactive carbon are very strongly radioactive, containing as much as 5% of the radioactive isotope. 

The concept of CSF restoration is based on the premise that radiation release to the environment is minimized if barriers to radiation release are protected. The CSF restoration guidelines are aimed at protection of these barriers between radioactivity contained in the fuel and the public and can be grouped into three major classes ... 

To photography we owe the discoveiy of radioactivity. The photographic emulsions produced nowadays for detecting radioactivity contain 80% or more of silver bromide so that little of radiation energy is lost by absorption In the gelatin and the grains of silver are in close proximity. 

Since the HTS boundary is preserved, the safety aspect is release of a portion of any radioactivity contained in the secondary side. Generally, the behaviour is bounded by steam and feedwater line failures. The secondary side controls are modelled in some detail to ensure that either their proper functioning, or lack of response, does not impair any safety system actions. Both normal and alternative modes of plant control are assessed. 

Group 1. Systems used for power production that also have a safety function. Group 1 systems by themselves must be able to shut down the plant, remove decay heat, keep radioactivity contained and monitor the state of the plant. 

---