Questionnaires data collection

A range of other data collection techniques are used in conjunction with process simulation such as interviews, the verbal protocols described earlier, walk-throughs and questionnaires. An appropriate analysis of the task is necessary in order to determine the nature of the simulation to be used. An... 

Additional examples of variability in data collection (which, in turn, affects data interpretation) include questionnaires and physical exam forms. Questionnaires often utilize open-ended questions that allow great variability in the type and extent of adverse event information gathered. Physical exam forms—even when designed in a checklist format—may elicit variable collection of adverse event data what is a serious event to one clinician may not be serious to another. 

Sometimes you may also see quality-of-life (QOL) data collected for your clinical trial. Quality-of-life data are collected to measure the overall physical and mental well-being of a patient. These data are usually collected with a multiple-question patient questionnaire and may be summed up into an aggregate patient score for analysis. Some commonly used quality-of-life questionnaires are the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, but there are quite a few disease-specific QOL questionnaires available to clinical researchers. 

Objective Can sexual advertising be related to hormonal conditions and circumstances Method Prospective field study, conducted at ten dancing-evenings including a total of 380 female probands. Data collection by questionnaire, video-tape and saliva collection,... 

Nevertheless, to estimate human exposure to PAEs measuring the chemicals in foodstuffs, collecting survey/questionnaire data on personal hfestyle and food consumption are not very satisfactory because there are other sources which contributed to the overall human exposure to PAEs (e.g., dermal ccaitact and envircaimental media). Because of that, since the late 1990s many studies have been conducted with the target to prove that the urinary concentration of PAE metabohtes could be used as biomarkers to estimate dose in risk human assessment of PAEs. 

Focused drug use evaluation (drug utilization review) can be done to identify problems concerning the use of specific medicines or the treatment of specific diseases, particularly in hospitals. The qualitative methods employed in social science (e.g. focus group discussion, in-depth interviews, structured observation and structured questionnaires), can be used to investigate the motives underlying irrational use. All data collected should be used to design interventions and to measure the impact of those interventions on medicine use. 

The Annual Reports Questionnaire (ARQ) is the mechanism through which Member States report to the United Nations on the drug control situations in their respective countries. The ARQ is integral to UNODC data collection activities. It is completed annually by member states and consists of three parts, (I) Legislative and administrative measures (II) Extent, patterns and trends of drug abuse, and (III) Illicit Supply of Drugs. 

Another advantage of the use of lead and mercury biomarkers is that exposure to both chemicals is more readily quantified through measurement of the biomarkers than through collection of questionnaire data or environmental measures (WHO 2001). In addition, both compounds have relatively long half-lives and therefore provide relatively stable metrics that integrate dose over long exposure periods. The lead example, which follows, details the development and utility of this blood biomarker. Similar information on mercury is presented in Appendix B. 

IRma - Inhalation rate (IR) during each macroactivity (ma) Estimated from size, age, and activity data collected with diaries and questionnaires using reference values m3/h... 

The data collected via questionnaires largely fall into two categories - demographics and outcomes . Demographic data describe the basic characteristics of respondents that will commonly be tested for possible causal relationships with the various outcomes. 

Standardized data collection — in-person interview — Telephone interview — Self-administered questionnaire — Existing records... 

Use of a standardized methodology for data collection is critical for collecting information for all study subjects, regardless of exposure or disease status. Information must be collected on exposure, outcome, and effect modifiers or confounders. There are several methods available for ascertaining information on exposures and outcomes, such as self-reported data obtained in personal or telephone interviews, self-administered questionnaires, diaries, observation, existing records, actual physical measurements, and collection of biological specimens (Armstrong et al. 1995). 

Gladys Block and co-workers have devised a questionnaire for collecting data on the general diet, but also on suspected risk factors for cancer, Part of this questionnaire is shown in Figure C.l, Block s questionnaire lakes care to include artificial sources of vitamins and minerals, which can be major sources of these nutrients in the diet. These include vitamin supplements (e,g., One-A-Day vitamins), mineral supplements (e,g,. Turns, calcium), and fortified foods, such as "breakfast bars,"... 

Data Collected from Observation Checklists and Questionnaire... 

In the present study, data have been collected through observation checklists, achievement tests, questionnaire and an informal interview thus, the data presented are both qualitative and quantitative. The data collected from the different data-collecting tools are presented below. 

Of the 284 males and 55 females that began the study, 15 withdrew before the study was completed. Eight completed only the electroretinograph (ERG) test, 3 completed only the Risk Factor Questionnaire (RFQ), and 2 completed both the ERG and RFQ before dropping out. Two additional subjects withdrew with after completing nearly all parts of the study. Most of the withdrawals (7) were due to a tropical storm that arrived at Hurlbert Field the week of the study. The storm forced researchers to cancel the final data collection day of the study. 

This study was in many respects a pioneering application of the C VM in Italy. Many insights have been gained that may be useful for future Italian C VM studies. For example, it was concluded at an early stage that face-to-face interviews were the only reasonable data collection option. At present, the response rates that can be expected for postal questionnaires are too low, and telephone interviews are only likely to be useful for valuation issues that are already familiar to the respondents before the interview. Moreover, the face-to-face interviews turned out to work rather well in practice. A high response rate was obtained and no interviewer bias was foimd. The lack of predictability and other problems related to the benefit estimates cannot be blamed on the face-to-face interviews per se. These problems concern instead the types of data that were collected by the inter-... 

To calculate QALY, we need to estimate the life years of the patient population based on clinical trial data and the health states and their durations during the life years. Health states are usually related to the study endpoints, for example, disease progression or deaths. Multistate analysis can be used to make these estimates. Once the health states are determined, the value or QoL (Q) associated with each state can be established using expert opinion, QoL data collected in the clinical studies, or direct or indirect research. The most frequently used method in practice is direct or indirect research by way of preference survey of health providers and patients. Time trade-off, standard gamble, and rating scale are among the ways to assess the preference of specific health state. As an alternative, indirect research uses questionnaires for health state in several health domains or attributes (e.g., EQ5D) and then to construct a multiattribute utility as a summary measure that reflects preferences both within and across health domains. 

---