Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantitative structure-activity relationships predicting with QSARs

Vectors A series of scalars can be arranged in a column or in a row. Then, they are called a column or a row vector. If the elements of a column vector can be attributed to special characteristics, e.g., to compounds, then data analysis can be completed. The chemical structures of compounds can be characterized with different numbers called descriptors, variables, predictors, or factors. For example, toxicity data were measured for a series of aromatic phenols. Their toxicity can be arranged in a column arbitrarily Each row corresponds to a phenolic compound. A lot of descriptors can be calculated for each compound (e.g., molecular mass, van der Waals volume, polarity parameters, quantum chemical descriptors, etc.). After building a multivariate model (generally one variable cannot encode the toxicity properly) we will be able to predict toxicity values for phenolic compounds for which no toxicity has been measured yet. The above approach is generally called searching quantitative structure - activity relationships or simply QSAR approach. [Pg.144]

In a study by Andersson et al. [30], the possibilities to use quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict physical chemical and ecotoxico-logical properties of approximately 200 different plastic additives have been assessed. Physical chemical properties were predicted with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Estimation Program Interface (EPI) Suite, Version 3.20. Aquatic ecotoxicity data were calculated by QSAR models in the Toxicity Estimation Software Tool (T.E.S.T.), version 3.3, from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, as described by Rahmberg et al. [31]. To evaluate the applicability of the QSAR-based characterization factors, they were compared to experiment-based characterization factors for the same substances taken from the USEtox organics database [32], This was done for 39 plastic additives for which experiment-based characterization factors were already available. [Pg.16]

As the chemical models mentioned here refer to some fundamental thermochemical and electronic effects of molecules, their application is not restricted to the prediction of chemical reactivity data. In fact, in the development of the models extensive comparisons were made with physical data, and thus such data can also be predicted from our models. Furthermore, some of the mechanisms responsible for binding substrates to receptors are naturally enough founded on quite similar electronic effects to those responsible for chemical reactivity. This suggest the use of the models developed here to calculate parameters for quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). [Pg.274]

For quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies a three-dimensional model of a DNA-quinoIone complex was built using molecular modeling techniques. It was based on the intercalation of quinolone into the double helix of DNA. It was concluded that the intercalation model is consistent with most available data on the structure of the quinolone complex. This predicted... [Pg.34]

It is not yet possible to design a molecule with specific odor (or taste) characteristics because the relations between sensory properties of flavor compounds and their molecular properties are not well understood. As a consequence, the development of compounds with desired flavor qualities has had to rely on relatively tedious synthetic approaches. Recent advances, however, in computer-based methods developed by the pharmaceutical industry to study QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationships) may ultimately be helpful in the rational design of new flavor-structures with predictable sensory attributes. Results from QSAR studies may also provide insight into the mechanism of the molecule-receptor interaction. [Pg.33]

Since one of the main aims of green chemistry is to reduce the use and/or production of toxic chemicals, it is important for practitioners to be able to make informed decisions about the inherent toxicity of a compound. Where sufficient ecotoxicological data have been generated and risk assessments performed, this can allow for the selection of less toxic options, such as in the case of some surfactants and solvents [94, 95]. When toxicological data are limited, for example, in the development of new pharmaceuticals (see Section 15.4.3) or other consumer products, there are several ways in which information available from other chemicals may be helpful to estimate effect measures for a compound where data are lacking. Of these, the most likely to be used are the structure-activity relationships (SARs, or QSARs when they are quantitative). These relationships are also used to predict chemical properties and behavior (see Chapter 16). There often are similarities in toxicity between chemicals that have related structures and/or functional subunits. Such relationships can be seen in the progressive change in toxicity and are described in QSARs. When several chemicals with similar structures have been tested, the measured effects can be mathematically related to chemical structure [96-98] and QSAR models used to predict the toxicity of substances with similar structure. Any new chemicals that have similar structures can then be assumed to elicit similar responses. [Pg.422]

Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) are important for predicting the oxidation potential of chemicals in Fenton s reaction system. To describe reactivity and physicochemical properties of the chemicals, five different molecular descriptors were applied. The dipole moment represents the polarity of a molecule and its effect on the reaction rates HOMo and LUMO approximate the ionization potential and electron affinities, respectively and the log P coefficient correlates the hydrophobicity, which can be an important factor relative to reactivity of substrates in aqueous media. Finally, the effect of the substituents on the reaction rates could be correlated with Hammett constants by Hammett s equation. [Pg.234]

Clearly, molecular structure influences the reaction kinetics of organic compounds during their photocatalytic oxidation. This relationship between degradability and molecular structure may be described using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. QSAR models can be developed to predict kinetic rate constants for organic compounds with similar chemical structures. The following section discusses QSAR models developed by Tang and Hendrix (1998) as well as those developed by other researchers. [Pg.374]

Methods to predict the hydrolysis rates of organic compounds for use in the environmental assessment of pollutants have not advanced significantly since the first edition of the Lyman Handbook (Lyman et al., 1982). Two approaches have been used extensively to obtain estimates of hydrolytic rate constants for use in environmental systems. The first and potentially more precise method is to apply quantitative structure/activity relationships (QSARs). To develop such predictive methods, one needs a set of rate constants for a series of compounds that have systematic variations in structure and a database of molecular descriptors related to the substituents on the reactant molecule. The second and more widely used method is to compare the target compound with an analogous compound or compounds containing similar functional groups and structure, to obtain a less quantitative estimate of the rate constant. [Pg.335]


See other pages where Quantitative structure-activity relationships predicting with QSARs is mentioned: [Pg.190]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.918]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.896]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.241]   


SEARCH



Activation prediction

Predicting structures

Prediction relationship

Prediction structure relationship

Predictive QSARs

QSAR

QSAR (Quantitative structure-activity activities

QSAR (quantitative structure-activity

QSAR relationships

QSARs (quantitative structure activity

QSARs relationships

QSARs structure-activity relationships

QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIPS

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships QSAR)

Quantitative activity prediction

Quantitative predictions

Quantitative structur-activity relationships

Quantitative structure-activity

Relationships with

Structural relationships with

Structured-prediction

© 2024 chempedia.info