QSAR relationships

Kdnemaim, H. (1981). QSAR relationships in fish toxicity stndies. Part I Relationship of 50 industrial pollutants. Toxicology 19, 209-221. 

Pleiss MA, Unger SH. The design of test series and the significance of QSAR relationships. In Ramsden CA, editor, Comprehensive medicinal chemistry. Vol. 4 Quantitative drug design. Oxford Pergamon Press, 1990. p. 561-87. 

The distribution of electrons within a molecule depends on the nature of the electron withdrawing and donating groups found in that structure. Hammett used this concept to calculate what are now known as Hammett constants (try) for a variety of monosubstituted benzoic acids (Equation (4.5)). He used these constants to calculate equilibrium and rate constants for chemical reactions. However, they are now used as electronic parameters in QSAR relationships. Hammett constants (crx) are defined as ... 

Hatch FT, Colvin ME. Quantitative structure-activity (QSAR) relationships of mutagenic aromatic and heterocyclic amines. Mutat Res 1997 376 87-96. 

Isaeva, G.A., Dmitriev, A.V. and Isaev, P.P. (2001) QSAR relationships for the anesthetic activity of acetanilides analyzed by regression and quantum-chemical methods. Pharm. Chem. J., 35, 348—350. 

A 3D QSAR is, therefore strictly speaking, a QSAR relationship in which the structural descriptors have 3D nature. Several compounds are studied at the same time within the framework of a regression model, with the objective of ascertaining which structural features significantly affect the biological response. Notably, these 3D descriptors are usually derived from the different modelling techniques. 

With simple test objects, especially, QSAR relationships are fairly clear - for example with isolated enzymes, organelles or organs. But if substances are used in intact organisms such QSAR relationships are overlaid to a greater or lesser extent by toxicokinetic processes concerned primarily with absorption, distribution and breakdown. 

Much better correlation coefficients are usually obtained with single system dedicated pre-screens. These entail QSAR relationships using related compounds on a single plant in situ vs. in vitro pre-screen (Figure Id), or use crop varieties having differential tolerance to a single herbicide (Figure lb). 

The factors being important for the significance and validity of QSAR relationships (compare chapter 5.2) have been reviewed in several publications [403 — 409]. 

Figure LI Representation of a classic QSAR relationship between Overton s data on the lowest concentration of test chemicals producing complete narcosis in tadpoles (log Me in mmol/1) and their olive oil/water partition coefficient (log P) data from Lipnick (1989a).

As stated, the development of complexes has been dictated by systematic changes based on empirical observations — the d5-Pt(am)2 unit works. A more quantitative approach takes into account a mathematical equation with electronic and steric factors and such parameters as lipophilicity. The idea that biological response was a function of chemical composition was first advanced in 1869 and a review of these developments is available in Albert s book (Chapter 1, Ref. 1). An account of the quantitative approach which correlates concentration to obtain a given response with electronic factors (e.g. Hammett constants) and lipophilicity (partition coefficients) has been given by Hansch [85]. Few QSAR relationships have been applied to the platinum complexes. 

Supported by the U.S. Qffice of Naval Research. I thank W. French, R. Johannesen, H. Guard, and F.E. Brinckman for their collaboration in much of the experimental work which forms the basis of our understanding of QSAR relationships for organotin compounds. Contribution 524 from the Harbor Branch Institution of Qceanography. 

This concept could be extended to any other linear and nonlinear QSAR relationships, by calculating either n x n distance matrices D (especially suited for nonlinear relationships) or n X n covariance matrices C as similarity measures. For this purpose, all or only several relevant properties of the compounds are used to calculate the corresponding similarity matrices. No superposition of the molecules is necessary. If a distance matrix D is calculated from the X matrix of explanatory physicochemical properties n rows, m columns), then all Xij values must be normalized before, i.e., mean-value-centered and standardized, column by column. The great advantage of distance similarity index matrices is that no special models need to be defined in the case of nonlinear relationships on the other hand, problems may arise from significant intercorrelations between the different columns of the similarity matrices. 

Few attempts have previously been made to apply QSAR modeling to repellent activities. This deficiency may be primarily due to the availability of only semiquantitative data on most of the extensive testing that was carried out earlier. One of the first quantitative attempts for measuring molecular properties such as lipophilicity, vapor pressure, and molecular chain lengths was by Suryanarayana and others. Working with 31 insect-repellent compounds, these researchers proposed a QSAR relationship in the form of... 

---