Quantitative activity prediction

Figure 13.11 Overview diagram of the NCTR Four-Phase approach for priority setting. In Phase I, chemicals with molecular weight < 94 or > 1000 or containing no ring structure will be rejected. In Phase II, three approaches (structural alerts, pharmacophores, and classification methods) that include a total of 11 models are used to make a qualitative activity prediction. In Phase III, a 3D QSAR/CoMFA model is used to make a more accurate quantitative activity prediction. In Phase IV, an expert system is expected to make a decision on priority setting based on a set of rules. Different phases are hierarchical different methods within each phase are complementary.

In this Phase, the CoMFA model (Section IV.E) was used to make a more accurate quantitative activity prediction for chemicals from Phase II. Chemicals with higher predicted binding affinity are given higher priority for further evaluation in Phase IV. The CoMFA model demonstrated good statistical reliability in both cross-validation and external validation (Shi et al., 2001). 

Methodologies for automated structure generation, pharmacophore mapping, and quantitative activity prediction are in the early stages of development. As more researchers report on the use of this technology, the utility and scope of the different approaches to these problems will become more evident. 

Understanding the relationship between the composition of a mixture and its properties is fundamental to the development of formulated products. In the pesticide industry, formulation chemists seek to translate such an understanding into products that meet criteria established for properties such as suspensibility, emulsibility, storage stability, compatibility, and most importantly, biological activity. The preferable way to acquire the necessary knowledge is to deduce the properties of mixtures in terms of mechanisms that are operative at the microscopic level. However, mixtures are extremely complex systems and the available theory is usually insufficient for developing useful theoretical models. For example, we are unable quantitatively to predict, on the basis of molecular theory, the suspensibility of a wettable powder from a knowledge of its composition. 

Activity prediction can be trained in Apex-3D on the basis of identified biophores to provide the best estimation for a particular type of compound. Activities for new molecules are then predicted from their own dynamically created training set. Predictions can be made as classification of the new compound into predefined classes or by calculating a quantitative value based on 3D QSAR models present in the knowledge base. 

For a weakly exoergic intramolecular ET reaction, the rate is strongly temperature activated. The observed temperature dependence (31) agreed quantitatively with predictions made using the parameters measured earlier for the dependence of rate constants on AG at constant temperature (i.e., from Figure 6, bottom). 

The merging of data for a series of known inhibitors results in the construction of a HASL (Hypothetical Active Site Lattice) which serves to quantitatively and predictively model enzyme-inhibitor interaction. Details of the HASL methodology are discussed and the approach illustrated using E. coli dihvdrofolate reductase inhibitors. 

While 3-D pharmacophore/agrophore searches indicate best matches of relevant key functions, i.e., (semi)qualitative result, a linear regression derived from a statistical analysis of spatial features and measured activities yields quantitative structure-activity relationships (3-D QSAR). This may be extremely helpful for a detailed interpretation of existing results and the activity prediction of new or hypothetical compounds (Figure 3). 

No Barrier Theory (NBT) [1,2] is a new approach to calculating rate constants in solution that uses an experimental equilibrium constant and an assumed mechanism as the only empirical information needed in order to calculate a rate constant. What is directly calculated is the free energy of activation but conversion of this to a rate constant is trivial. The saving thing about these calculations is that relatively low-level quantum chemistry computational methods suffice in many cases semiempirical methods are sufficient. NBT also provides a way to think qualitatively about whether a reaction is likely to be slow or fast thus, it can be used both qualitatively to think about mechanisms and quantitatively to predict rates. 

Actively use expert judgment to adjust the historical data and establish quantitative reliability predictions for the new technology... 

Structure-activity relationship (SAR) and, more generally, stracture-property relationship (SPR) analysis are integral to the rational drag design cycle. Quantitative (QSAR, QSPR) methods assume that biological activity is correlated with chemical structures or properties and that as a consequence activity can be modelled as a function of calculable physiochemical attributes. Such a model for activity prediction could then be used, for instance, to screen candidate lead compounds or to suggest directions for new lead molecules. 

Modem electron transfer tlieory has its conceptual origins in activated complex tlieory, and in tlieories of nonradiative decay. The analysis by Marcus in tire 1950s provided quantitative connections between the solvent characteristics and tire key parameters controlling tire rate of ET. The Marcus tlieory predicts an adiabatic bimolecular ET rate as... 

In chemoinformatics, chirality is taken into account by many structural representation schemes, in order that a specific enantiomer can be imambiguously specified. A challenging task is the automatic detection of chirality in a molecular structure, which was solved for the case of chiral atoms, but not for chirality arising from other stereogenic units. Beyond labeling, quantitative descriptors of molecular chirahty are required for the prediction of chiral properties such as biological activity or enantioselectivity in chemical reactions) from the molecular structure. These descriptors, and how chemoinformatics can be used to automatically detect, specify, and represent molecular chirality, are described in more detail in Chapter 8. 

A challenging task in material science as well as in pharmaceutical research is to custom tailor a compound s properties. George S. Hammond stated that the most fundamental and lasting objective of synthesis is not production of new compounds, but production of properties (Norris Award Lecture, 1968). The molecular structure of an organic or inorganic compound determines its properties. Nevertheless, methods for the direct prediction of a compound s properties based on its molecular structure are usually not available (Figure 8-1). Therefore, the establishment of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships (QSPRs) and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs) uses an indirect approach in order to tackle this problem. In the first step, numerical descriptors encoding information about the molecular structure are calculated for a set of compounds. Secondly, statistical and artificial neural network models are used to predict the property or activity of interest based on these descriptors or a suitable subset. 

Furthermore, QSPR models for the prediction of free-energy based properties that are based on multilinear regression analysis are often referred to as LFER models, especially, in the wide field of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). 

An area of great interest in the polymer chemistry field is structure-activity relationships. In the simplest form, these can be qualitative descriptions, such as the observation that branched polymers are more biodegradable than straight-chain polymers. Computational simulations are more often directed toward the quantitative prediction of properties, such as the tensile strength of the bulk material. 

QSAJi Methods for Fluid Solubility Prediction. Several group contribution methods for predicting Hquid solubiHties have been developed. These methods as weU as other similar methods are often called quantitative stmcture-activity relationships (QSARs). This field is experiencing rapid development. 

---