Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Property-vapor pressure relationships

Banerjee, S., Howard, P.H., Lande, S.S. (1990) General structure vapor pressure relationship for organics. Chemosphere 21,1173-1180. Barak, E., Dinoor, A., Jacoby, B. (1983) Adsorption of systemic fungicides and a herbicide by some components of plant tissues, in relation to some physicochemical properties of the pesticides. Pest. Sci. 14(3), 213-219. [Pg.934]

Bt = Cp(Tg,p — 7 )/(A/tv), where FFg.p is the fuel vapor mass fraction interpolated to the droplet location. For 7 > Jb, By is set equal to Bj. The Clausius-Qapeyron equilibrium vapor-pressure relationship is used to compute the fuel mass fraction at the droplet surface. In addition, convective correction actors (based on Ranz and Marshall correlations) are applied to obtain spray evaporation rates at high Reynolds numbers. Liquid properties are evaluated using the one third rule for reference mass fractions [28]. Advanced models for droplet evaporation accounting for nonequilibrium effects can also be incorporated in the above framework by altering the timescales associated with the droplet lifetime and the convective heating. [Pg.819]

The accurate determination of relative retention volumes and Kovats indices is of great utility to the analyst, for besides being tools of identification, they can also be related to thermodynamic properties of solutions (measurements of vapor pressure and heats of vaporization on nonpolar columns) and activity coefficients on polar columns by simple relationships (179). [Pg.362]

Some selected chemical and physical properties of naphthalene are given in Table 1. Selected values from the vapor pressure—temperature relationship for naphthalene are Hsted in Table 2, as are selected viscosity—temperature relationships for Hquid naphthalene. Naphthalene forms a2eotropes with several compounds some of these mixtures are Hsted in Table 3. [Pg.481]

Deardon, J.C. (2003) Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships for Prediction of Boiling Point, Vapor Pressure and Melting Point. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 22(8), 1696-1709. [Pg.39]

The properties of liquid metals can cause flow instability (oscillation) because of vapor pressure—temperature relationship. Most liquid metals, especially alkali metals, show a greater change in saturation temperature, corresponding to a given change of pressure, than does water. In a vertical system under gravitational force, the change of static pressure could appreciably alter the saturation temperature such that explosion -type flow oscillation would occur that would result in liquid... [Pg.392]

At the fundamental level of equilibrium modeling the advantages are many. The model can combine a number of compartments through simple relationship to describe a realistic environment within which chemicals can be ranked and compared. Primary compartments that chemicals will tend to migrate toward or accumulate in can be identified. The arrangement of compartments and their volumes can be selected to address specific environmental scenarios. Data requirements are minimal, if the water solubility and vapor pressure of a chemical are known, other properties can be estimated, and a reasonable estimate of partitioning characteristics can be made. This is an invaluable tool in the early evaluation of chemical, whether the model be applied to projected environmental hazard or evaluation of the behavior of a chemical in an environmental application, as with pesticides. Finally, the approach is mathematically very simple and can be handled on simple computing devices. [Pg.121]

As was discussed earlier in Section 1.2.8 a complication arises in that two of these properties (solubility and vapor pressure) are dependent on whether the solute is in the liquid or solid state. Solid solutes have lower solubilities and vapor pressures than they would have if they had been liquids. The ratio of the (actual) solid to the (hypothetical supercooled) liquid solubility or vapor pressure is termed the fugacity ratio F and can be estimated from the melting point and the entropy of fusion. This correction eliminates the effect of melting point, which depends on the stability of the solid crystalline phase, which in turn is a function of molecular symmetry and other factors. For solid solutes, the correct property to plot is the calculated or extrapolated supercooled liquid solubility. This is calculated in this handbook using where possible a measured entropy of fusion, or in the absence of such data the Walden s Rule relationship suggested by Yalkowsky (1979) which implies an entropy of fusion of 56 J/mol-K or 13.5 cal/mol-K (e.u.)... [Pg.15]

There is a continuing effort to extend the long-established concept of quantitative-structure-activity-relationships (QSARs) to quantitative-structure-property relationships (QSPRs) to compute all relevant environmental physical-chemical properties (such as aqueous solubility, vapor pressure, octanol-water partition coefficient, Henry s law constant, bioconcentration factor (BCF), sorption coefficient and environmental reaction rate constants from molecular structure). [Pg.15]

Whenever the solute and solvent exhibit significant degrees of mutual attraction, deviations from the simple relationships will be observed. The properties of these nonideal solutions must be determined by the balance of attractive and disruptive forces. When a definite attraction can exist between the solute and solvent, the vapor pressure of each component is normally decreased. The overall vapor pressure of the system will then exhibit significant deviations from linearity in its concentration dependence, as is illustrated in Fig. 10B. [Pg.28]

Engelhardt, H., McClelland, H. E., Jurs, P. C. Quantitative structure-property relationships for the prediction of vapor pressures of organic compounds from molecular structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 967-975. [Pg.500]

It is shown that the properties of fully ionized aqueous electrolyte systems can be represented by relatively simple equations over wide ranges of composition. There are only a few systems for which data are available over the full range to fused salt. A simple equation commonly used for nonelectrolytes fits the measured vapor pressure of water reasonably well and further refinements are clearly possible. Over the somewhat more limited composition range up to saturation of typical salts such as NaCl, the equations representing thermodynamic properties with a Debye-Hiickel term plus second and third virial coefficients are very successful and these coefficients are known for nearly 300 electrolytes at room temperature. These same equations effectively predict the properties of mixed electrolytes. A stringent test is offered by the calculation of the solubility relationships of the system Na-K-Mg-Ca-Cl-SO - O and the calculated results of Harvie and Weare show excellent agreement with experiment. [Pg.464]

Gas-liquid relationships, in the geochemical sense, should be considered liquid-solid-gas interactions in the subsurface. The subsurface gas phase is composed of a mixture of gases with various properties, usually found in the free pore spaces of the solid phase. Processes involved in the gas-liquid and gas-solid interface interactions are controlled by factors such as vapor pressure-volatilization, adsorption, solubility, pressure, and temperature. The solubility of a pure gas in a closed system containing water reaches an equilibrium concentration at a constant pressure and temperature. A gas-liquid equilibrium may be described by a partition coefficient, relative volatilization and Henry s law. [Pg.144]

This area is a development in the usage of NDDO models that emphasizes their utility for large-scale problems. Structure-activity relationships (SARs) are widely used in the pharmaceutical industry to understand how the various features of biologically active molecules contribute to their activity. SARs typically take the form of equations, often linear equations, that quantify activity as a function of variables associated with the molecules. The molecular variables could include, for instance, molecular weight, dipole moment, hydrophobic surface area, octanol-water partition coefficient, vapor pressure, various descriptors associated with molecular geometry, etc. For example, Cramer, Famini, and Lowrey (1993) found a strong correlation (r = 0.958) between various computed properties for 44 alkylammonium ions and their ability to act as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors according to the equation... [Pg.152]

This relationship constitutes the basic definition of the activity. If the solution behaves ideally, a, =x, and Equation (18) define Raoult s law. Those four solution properties that we know as the colligative properties are all based on Equation (12) in each, solvent in solution is in equilibrium with pure solvent in another phase and has the same chemical potential in both phases. This can be solvent vapor in equilibrium with solvent in solution (as in vapor pressure lowering and boiling point elevation) or solvent in solution in equilibrium with pure, solid solvent (as in freezing point depression). Equation (12) also applies to osmotic equilibrium as shown in Figure 3.2. [Pg.110]

Therefore, similar to the attempts made to estimate vapor pressure (Section 4.4) there have been a series of quite promising approaches to derive topological, geometric, and electronic molecular descriptors for prediction of aqueous activity coefficients from chemical structure (e.g., Mitchell and Jurs, 1998 Huibers and Katritzky, 1998). The advantage of such quantitative structure property relationships (QSPRs) is, of course, that they can be applied to any compound for which the structure is known. The disadvantages are that these methods require sophisticated computer software, and that they are not very transparent for the user. Furthermore, at the present stage, it remains to be seen how good the actual predictive capabilities of these QSPRs are. [Pg.174]

The vapor pressure values have been calculated at the indicated temperatures using the relationship derived from experimental data at Pennsylvania State University, and a critical review of literature references (5). This study is a part of the effort by the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) to obtain accurate data through their Design Institute for Physical Property Data (DIPPR). [Pg.428]

Before studying the properties of gases and liquids, we need to understand the relationship between the two phases. The starting point will be a study of vapor pressure and the development of the definition of the critical point. Then we will look in detail at the effects of pressure and temperature on one of the intensive properties of particular interest to petroleum engineers specific volume. [Pg.46]

Selected compound-specific functions, property-temperature-property relationships, or structure-temperature-property relationships are supplied and discussed in this book for density (Section 3.5), refractive index (Section 4.5), surface tension (Section 5.4), viscosity (Section 6.4), vapor pressure (Section 7.4), enthalpy of vaporization (Section 8.5), aqueous solubility (Section 11.8), and air-water partition coefficients (Section 12.5). [Pg.23]

Solvatochromic Approach Solvatochromic relationships are multivariate correlations between a property, usually solubility or partitioning property (see Sections 11.4 and 13.3), and solvatochromic parameters, parameters that account for the solutes interaction with the solvent. In the case of vapor pressure, the solvatochromic parameters only have to account for intermolecular interaction such as selfassociation between the solute (i.e., pure compound) molecules themselves. The following model has been reported for liquid and solid compounds, including hydrocarbons, halogenated hydrocarbons, alkanols, dialkyl ethers, and compounds such as dimethyl formamide, dimethylacetamide, pyridine, and dimethyl sulfoxide... [Pg.78]

Dearden, J.C., Quantitative structure-property relationships for prediction of boiling point, vapor pressure and melting point, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 22, 1696-1709, 2003. [Pg.53]


See other pages where Property-vapor pressure relationships is mentioned: [Pg.77]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.1524]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.946]    [Pg.224]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.77 ]




SEARCH



Property relationships

Vapor properties

© 2024 chempedia.info