Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Of aqueous activity coefficient

Availability of Experimental Data Methods for Estimation of Aqueous Activity Coefficient and Aqueous Solubility... [Pg.134]

Therefore, similar to the attempts made to estimate vapor pressure (Section 4.4) there have been a series of quite promising approaches to derive topological, geometric, and electronic molecular descriptors for prediction of aqueous activity coefficients from chemical structure (e.g., Mitchell and Jurs, 1998 Huibers and Katritzky, 1998). The advantage of such quantitative structure property relationships (QSPRs) is, of course, that they can be applied to any compound for which the structure is known. The disadvantages are that these methods require sophisticated computer software, and that they are not very transparent for the user. Furthermore, at the present stage, it remains to be seen how good the actual predictive capabilities of these QSPRs are. [Pg.174]

More rigorous methods for the calculation of aqueous activity coefficients are available.18... [Pg.29]

Opperhuizen, A. (1987) Relationships between octan-l-ol/water partition coefficients, aqueous activity coefficients and reversed phase HPLC capacity factors of alkylbenzenes, chlorobenzenes, chloronaphthalenes and chlorobiphenyls. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 15, 349-364. [Pg.913]

Usually, however, the distribution coefficients determined experimentally are not equal to the ratios of the solubility product because the ratio of the activity coefficients of the constituents in the solid phase cannot be assumed to be equal to 1. Actually observed D values show that activity coefficients in the solid phase may differ markedly from 1. Let us consider, for example, the coprecipitation of MnC03 in calcite. Assuming that the ratio of the activity coefficients in the aqueous solution is close to unity, the equilibrium distribution may be formulated as (cf. Eq. A.6.11)... [Pg.238]

Figure 3. The effect of dissolved organic carbon on the aqueous activity coefficient estimated from the octanol-water partition coefficient. Figure 3. The effect of dissolved organic carbon on the aqueous activity coefficient estimated from the octanol-water partition coefficient.
Table VI summarizes values of the activity coefficient ratio Ygr-/YC].- in the saturated solution for each average solid composition (as calculated from the model of Table II), the calculated provisional equilibrium distribution coefficient (Equation 12) and the provisional equilibrium aqueous solution activity ratio of Br to Cl- (Equation 13) based on the data of Table V. Table VI summarizes values of the activity coefficient ratio Ygr-/YC].- in the saturated solution for each average solid composition (as calculated from the model of Table II), the calculated provisional equilibrium distribution coefficient (Equation 12) and the provisional equilibrium aqueous solution activity ratio of Br to Cl- (Equation 13) based on the data of Table V.
About the same time Beutier and Renon (11) also proposed a similar model for the representation of the equilibria in aqueous solutions of weak electrolytes. The vapor was assumed to be an ideal gas and < >a was set equal to unity. Pitzer s method was used for the estimation of the activity coefficients, but, in contrast to Edwards et al. (j)), two ternary parameters in the activity coefficient expression were employed. These were obtained from data on the two-solute systems It was found that the equilibria in the systems NH3+ H2S+H20, NH3+C02+H20 and NH3+S02+H20 could be represented very well up to high concentrations of the ionic species. However, the model was unreliable at high concentrations of undissociated ammonia. Edwards et al. (1 2) have recently proposed a new expression for the representation of the activity coefficients in the NH3+H20 system, over the complete concentration range from pure water to pure NH3. it appears that this area will assume increasing importance and that one must be able to represent activity coefficients in the region of high concentrations of molecular species as well as in dilute solutions. Cruz and Renon (13) have proposed an expression which combines the equations for electrolytes with the non-random two-liquid (NRTL) model for non-electrolytes in order to represent the complete composition range. In a later publication, Cruz and Renon (J4J, this model was applied to the acetic acid-water system. [Pg.53]

With an aqueous fluid phase of high ionic strength, the problem of obtaining activity coefficients may be circumvented simply by using apparent equilibrium constants expressed in terms of concentrations. This procedure is recommended for hydro-metallurgical systems in which complexation reactions are important, e.g., in ammonia, chloride, or sulfate solutions. [Pg.748]

Some stability constants for ion pairs on Fe oxides are listed in Table 10.4. This model was applied by Davis and Leckie (1978, 1980) to adsorption of various cations and anions on ferrihydrite. The extended triple layer model of Sahai and Svenjensky (1997) incorporates recent advances in aqueous electrolyte chemistry which enable aqueous activity coefficients for electrolytes to be calculated over a wide range of ionic strengths. The model also considers the free energy of adsorption of an ion to be the sum of the contributions from an electrostatic term, a Born solvation term and a ion intrinsic term. This extended model has been applied to adsorption of Co and Cd on goethite. [Pg.257]

In addition, data for the thermodynamic properties of the species themselves are given as mentioned above for the primary master species (of course, no aqueous activity coefficients are required for solids and gases). [Pg.564]

Solvation Effects. Many previous accounts of the activity coefficients have considered the connections between the solvation of ions and deviations from the DH limiting-laws in a semi-empirical manner, e.g., the Robinson and Stokes equation (3). In the interpretation of results according to our model, the parameter a also relates to the physical reality of a solvated ion, and the effects of polarization on the interionic forces are closely related to the nature of this entity from an electrostatic viewpoint. Without recourse to specific numerical results, we briefly illustrate the usefulness of the model by defining a polarizable cosphere (or primary solvation shell) as that small region within which the solvent responds to the ionic field in nonlinear manner the solvent outside responds linearly through mild Born-type interactions, described adequately with the use of the dielectric constant of the pure solvent. (Our comments here refer largely to activity coefficients in aqueous solution, and we assume complete dissociation of the solute. The polarizability of cations in some solvents, e.g., DMF and acetonitrile, follows a different sequence, and there is probably some ion-association.)... [Pg.218]

His procedure was used for the calculation of the activity coefficients in the aqueous solution of two electrolytes with a common ion from isopiestic data (3). Kelly, Robinson, and Stokes (4) proposed a treatment of isopiestic data of ternary systems with two electrolytes by a procedure based on the assumption that at all values of molal concentrations, mi,m2, the partial derivatives may be expressed by a sum of two functions in their differential form as follows ... [Pg.365]

Solubilities and Aqueous Activity Coefficients of Organic Liquids Solubilities and Aqueous Activity Coefficients of Organic Solids Solubilities and Aqueous Activity Coefficients of Organic Gases Illustrative Example 5.1 Deriving Liquid Aqueous Solubilities, Aqueous Activity Coefficients, and Excess Free Energies in Aqueous Solution from Experimental Solubility Data... [Pg.133]

Enthalpic and Entropic Contributions to the Excess Free Energy Molecular Picture of the Dissolution Process Model for Description of the Aqueous Activity Coefficient Box 5.1 Estimating Molar Volumes from Structure Illustrative Example 5.2 Evaluating the Factors that Govern the Aqueous Activity Coefficient of a Given Compound... [Pg.133]

Illustrative Example 5.3 Evaluating the Effect of Temperature on Aqueous Solubilities and Aqueous Activity Coefficients Dissolved Inorganic Salts... [Pg.133]

Illustrative Example 5.4 Quantifying the Effect of Inorganic Salts on Aqueous Solubility and Aqueous Activity Coefficients... [Pg.133]

We will start our discussion by considering a special case, that is, the situation in which the molecules of a pure compound (gas, liquid, or solid) are partitioned so that its concentration reflects equilibrium between the pure material and aqueous solution. In this case, we refer to the equilibrium concentration (or the saturation concentration) in the aqueous phase as the water solubility or the aqueous solubility of the compound. This concentration will be denoted as Qf. This compound property, which has been determined experimentally for many compounds, tells us the maximum concentration of a given chemical that can be dissolved in pure water at a given temperature. In Section 5.2, we will discuss how the aqueous activity coefficient at saturation, y, , is related to aqueous solubility. We will also examine when we can use yf as the activity coefficient of a compound in diluted aqueous solution, y (which represents a more relevant situation in the environment). [Pg.135]

Solubilities and Aqueous Activity Coefficients of Organic Liquids... [Pg.135]

Now we can see a key result. The aqueous mole fraction solubility of an organic liquid is simply given by the inverse aqueous activity coefficient ... [Pg.137]

Obviously, we can also say that for a liquid compound, the aqueous activity coefficient at saturation is given by the inverse of its mole fraction solubility ... [Pg.137]

It thus follows that the aqueous activity coefficient of a gaseous pure compound is related to the solubility by ... [Pg.139]

Let us now extend our molecular descriptor model introduced in Chapter 4 (Eqs. 4-26 and 4-27) to the aqueous activity coefficient. We should point out it is not our principal goal to derive an optimized tool for prediction of yw, but to develop further our understanding of how certain structural features determine a compound s partitioning behavior between aqueous and nonaqueous phases. Therefore, we will try to keep our model as simple as possible. For a more comprehensive treatment of this topic [i.e., of so-called linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs)] we refer to the literature (e.g., Kamlet et al., 1983 Abraham et al., 1990 Abraham, 1993 Abraham et al., 1994a and b Sherman et al., 1996). [Pg.146]


See other pages where Of aqueous activity coefficient is mentioned: [Pg.172]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.663]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.663]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.152]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.149 ]




SEARCH



Activity Coefficients of Some Ions in Aqueous Solution

Activity aqueous

Activity coefficients of aqueous species

Aqueous activity coefficients

© 2024 chempedia.info