Corrective action timely

Audit findings/corrective action time Average time to act on safety suggestions % training completed... 

Regulators may be used in gas blanketing systems to maintain a protective environment above anv liquid stored in a tank or vessel as the liquid is pumped out. When the temperature of the vessel is suddenly cooled, the regulator maintains the tank pressure and protects the waUs of the tank from possible collapse. Regulators are known for their fast dynamic response. The absence of time delay that often comes with more sophisticated control systems makes the regulator useful in applications requiring fast corrective action. 

Adequate The management systems audited provided reasonable protection from significant loss or noncompliance. Most of the required management systems are documented, but not necessarily followed every time. Some corrective action is required. 

Client contacts should be notified of issues in a timely manner. Depending upon the nature and gravity of the issue, tolling may be stopped completely for a period of time or continue in limited production mode until the situation is fully diagnosed and corrective action can be implemented. 

Many times, the broken part of a pump is replaced when it tails without an effort to understand why the situation happened. Any corrective action that takes place is usually a temporary arrangement. The probability is quite high that the pump will fail again for the same reason. This part replaeement with no analysis practice is not accepstable due to the high cost of the maintenanee, parts, time and lost produetion. 

This data may be needed to trace the source of any problems with product which was produced using this equipment. To take corrective action you will also need to know the configuration of the process plant at the time of processing the product. If only one piece of equipment is involved, the above records will give you this information but if the process plant consists of many items of equipment which are periodically changed during maintenance, you will need to know which equipment was in use when the fault is likely to have been generated. 

Element 4.13 of ISO 9001 deals with specific nonconformities and element 4.14 deals with the action to eliminate their cause and prevent their recurrence. This additional ISO/TS 16949 requirement does seem to duplicate what is covered in clause 4.14.2. However, it does add a significant aspect - a reduction plan. One could be complying with elements 4.13 and 4.14 of ISO 9001 but have no reduction plan, since element 4.14 does not impose any time constraints on corrective action or require the incidence of nonconformity to be reduced. It is quite possible to take corrective action continuously and still not reduce the number of nonconformities. The requirement may be in the wrong place (i.e. in 4.13 rather than 4.14) but it is a useful addition nonetheless. 

If you need to recall product that is suspected as being defective you will need to devise a recall plan, specify responsibilities and time-scales, and put the plan into effect. Product recall is a remedial action not a corrective action, as it does not prevent a recurrence of the initial problem. 

The corrective action requirements fail to stipulate when corrective action should be taken except to say that they shall be to a degree appropriate to the risks encountered. There is no compulsion for the supplier to correct nonconformities before repeat production or shipment of subsequent product. However, immediate correction is not always practical. You should base the timing of your corrective action on the severity of the nonconformities. All nonconformities are costly to the business, but correction also adds to the cost and should be matched to the benefits it will accrue (see later under Risks). Any action taken to eliminate a nonconformity before the customer receives the product or service could be considered a preventive action. By this definition, final inspection is a preventive action because it should prevent the supply of nonconforming product to the customer. However, an error becomes a nonconformity when detected at any acceptance stage in the process, as indicated in clause 4.12 of the standard. Therefore an action taken to eliminate a potential nonconformity prior to an acceptance stage is a preventive action. This rules out any inspection stages as being preventive action measures - they are detection measures only. 

This contains two separate requirements one for verifying that the prescribed action has been taken and the other for verifying that the action has been effective in eliminating the original nonconformity. The Corrective Action report should define the corrective action to be taken, the actionee, and the date by which it is to be completed. The action-ee should report when the action has been completed in order that it may be verified. The effectiveness of some actions can be verified at the same time but quite often the effectiveness can only be checked after a considerable lapse of time. Remember it took an analysis to detect the nonconformity therefore it may take further analysis to detect that the nonconformity has been eliminated. In such cases the report should indicate when the checks for effectiveness are to be carried out and provision made for indicating that the corrective action has or has not been effective. 

Your quality system therefore needs to accommodate various corrective action strategies, from simple intradepartmental analysis with solutions that affect only one area, procedure, process, or product to projects that involve many departments, occasionally including suppliers and customers. Your corrective action procedures need to address these situations in order that when the time comes you are adequately equipped to respond promptly. 

To guarantee shipment on time, you either need to maintain an adequate inventory of finished goods for shipment on demand or utilize only predictable processes and obtain sufficient advanced order information from your customer. When you examine some of the requirements in ISO/TS 16949, you may be tempted to question how you can continually improve performance, reduce costs, and minimize space, material travel, equipment downtime, process variation, etc. and meet 100% on-time shipments. You can t, unless you have a partnership with your customer in which there is mutual assistance to meet common objectives. Without sufficient lead time on orders you will be unlikely to meet the target. However, the standard does acknowledge that you may not always be successful. There will be matters outside your control and matters over which you need complete control. It is the latter that you can do something about and take corrective action should the target not be achieved. 

The standard requires the management personnel responsible for the area to take timely corrective action on the deficiencies found during the audit. 

The standard does not in fact require follow-up audits but clearly if follow-up action is necessary to verify any corrective actions that have been taken, it should do two things verify that the agreed action has been taken and verify that the original nonconformity has been eliminated. Follow-up audits may be carried out immediately after the planned completion date of the corrective action or at some other agreed time. However, unless the audit is carried out relatively close to the agreed completion date, it will not be possible to ascertain if the action was timely. 

This information is likely to be recorded at the time the service is carried out and may well be remote from the parent plant therefore allowance for this should be made in the procedures. Provision needs to be made for this information to be collected, stored, and any corrective actions taken as a result of unusual trends being detected (see Part 2 Chapter 14). 

Protection is the branch of electric power engineering concerned with the principles of design and operation of equipment (called relays nr protective relays ) which detect abnormal power system conditions and initiate corrective action as quickly as possible in order to return the power system to its normal state. The quickness of response is an essential element of protective relaying systems—response times of the order of a few milliseconds are often required. Consequently, human intervention in the protection of system operation is not possible. The response must be automatic, quick, and should cause a minimum amount of disruption to the power system. 

As a project progresses and you monitor performance, there will be times when actual does not measure up to plan. This calls for corrective action. However, don t be too quick to take action. Some deficiencies turn out to be self-correcting. It is unrealistic to expect steady and consistent progress day after day. Sometimes you ll fall behind and sometimes you ll be ahead, but in a well-planned project, you will probably finish on schedule and within budget. 

OSHA 1910.119 does not mandate the specific type of investigation a plant must conduct when a reportable incident occurs. However, it provides stipulations that must be met for the following investigator qualifications, time requirements, report content, review process, and corrective actions. 

---