Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Process Comparisons

Of the SSP processes available today only System 1, the process described above, does not use mechanical agitation to prevent the agglomeration of pellets. All other processes use some form of mechanical agitation during either [Pg.173]

Precrystallization Initial crystallization Initial heating Initial drying De-dusting  [Pg.174]

Post-crystallization/heating Low-melting-peak shift Final drying De-dusting Setting-reactor PET Temperature [Pg.174]

PET temperature control IV increase AA reduction Initial product cooling [Pg.174]

The fluid bed has generally established itself as the preferred equipment for the crystallization and for the cooling section of the SSP plant. High heat-transfer coefficients enable the pellets to be heated and cooled very quickly, pellet agitation can be achieved without dust generation, and the direct contact between gas and solid enables a de-dusting effect. [Pg.175]

Both processes are capable of highly efficient production of the same quality product with the same limits on atmospheric pollution, therefore any comparison must be related to other aspects unique to each process. These distinctions will ultimately determine the most desirable process for this application. The process comparisons are [Pg.42]

Harvin, R.L. Leray, D.G., and Roudier, L.R., Single Pressure or Dual Pressure [Pg.43]

Nitric Acid An Objective Comparison , Ammonia Plant Safety, Volume 21, pp. 173-183 (1979). [Pg.43]

The aim of Chapter 8 is to bring Chapters 5 (MF), 6 (UFJ and 7 (TTF) together and compare filtration behaviour against a number of criteria. The first criterion will be the clean membrane characteristics such as flux, permeability, operational pressure, membrane resistance, and MWCO or pore si.  [Pg.281]

Further, rejection of organics will be investigated as a function of membrane pure water flux, MWCO or pore si e. This is followed by fouling under fouling conditions where resistances of the fouling layers will he compared. Then particulate fouling is investigated and similar comparisons of resistances and rejection are made. The next section is dedicated to the effect of ferric chloride pretreatment on flux and rejection of a number of membranes. [Pg.281]

From the information gained, the membrane area requirements per product water at typical recoveries will he calculated. This translates directly into cost. [Pg.281]

While a detailed cost analysis is not carried out, the final section is an alternative approach to the conventional cost analysis and is concerned with environmental considerations. These have been neglected in many previous cost studies and the aim is to raise issues for further investigations into a complete, cost analysis. The section includes energy requirements, chemicals consumption, concentrate characteristics, health and water quality aspects, and suggestions for future water treatment. [Pg.281]


Table 8-29 Process comparison of various RP manufacturing techniques... [Pg.513]

The fundamental mechanisms of free radical reactions were considered in Chapter 11 of Part A. Several mechanistic issues are crucial in development of free radical reactions for synthetic applications.285 Free radical reactions are usually chain processes, and the lifetimes of the intermediate radicals are very short. To meet the synthetic requirements of high selectivity and efficiency, all steps in a desired sequence must be fast in comparison with competing reactions. Owing to the requirement that all the steps be fast, only steps that are exothermic or very slightly endothermic can participate in chain processes. Comparison between addition of a radical to a carbon-carbon double bond and addition to a carbonyl group can illustrate this point. [Pg.956]

Fig. 22 Static mixer reactor for two-phase process Comparison with conventional stirred tank... Fig. 22 Static mixer reactor for two-phase process Comparison with conventional stirred tank...
TABLE 12-4. Biomass Thermal Conversion Process Comparison... [Pg.283]

Figure 5.9 Two main ordering processes comparison between the process of polymerization and the process of surfactant aggregation. Figure 5.9 Two main ordering processes comparison between the process of polymerization and the process of surfactant aggregation.
Steensen M (1996) Chemical Oxidation for the Treatment of Leachate - Process Comparison and Results from Fullscale Plants in Clausthaler Umwelt-Akademie Oxidation of Water and Wastewater, A Vogelpohl (Hrsg.), Goslar 20.-22. Mai. 1996. [Pg.175]

A 48-membered library of 2-arylbenzoxazoles has been prepared by the condensation of substituted 2-aminophenols with a series of acid chlorides. The reactions proceeded in the absence of a base in sealed tubes in an automated microwave instrument, which used sequential rather than parallel reaction processing. Comparisons to the conventional thermal conditions demonstrated the importance of the high temperatures and pressures achieved under microwave heating, which ensured that the reactions proceeded efficiently (Scheme 3.16)26. An analogous synthesis ofbenzoxazolesby the cyclocondensation reaction of 2-aminophenols with S-methylisothioamide hydroiodides on silica gel, under microwave irradiation, has also been reported (Scheme 3.16)27. [Pg.52]

One of the most remarkable recent advances in metal carbonyl substitution chemistry has been the discovery by Coville and co-workers of the homogeneous and heterogeneous catalytic labilization of the metal-carbon bond in metal-carbonyl complexes (26-31). Considering that restrictions to catalysis involving metal carbonyl species can, in some instances, be related to the strength of the metal-carbon bond, these discoveries could have far-reaching implications. To exemplify these catalytic substitution processes, comparisons in the systems M(CO)6(M = Cr, Mo, W), CpMoI(CO)3, CpFeI(CO)2, Fe(CO)5, Fe(CO)4(olefin), and Ir4(CO)12 will be made. [Pg.225]

A glance at the pKa values in Table 3.1 reveals that many classes of compounds can act either as acids or as bases, depending on the reaction environment. Such materials are termed amphoteric. They must have an acidic proton (i.e., a proton attached to an electronegative element or group) and unshared pairs of electrons that can be donated to a proton. For example, water, alcohols, and other hydroxylic compounds as well as amines and amides are all amphoteric materials. Comparing the p.Ka s of these materials permits an assessment of the predominant behavior in a given environment. For example, if an amine is dissolved in water, it could function as an acid or a base. To determine which behavior will predominate, the position of the equilibrium can be determined for each process. Comparison of these values will indicate which will be the principal behavior. Thus, as an acid, the amine would donate a proton to water to give an amide anion and the hydronium ion. [Pg.56]

Calorimetric (DSC) measurements yield thermodynamic properties of duplex melting in these oligonucleotides independent of any assumptions concerning the model of melting, such as a cooperative all-or-none process versus a noncooperative, multiple-stage melting process. Comparison of calorimetric enthalpies with van t Hoff enthalpies obtained either from the manipulation of heat capacity curves outlined in equations (16.19) to (16.22), or from optical or NMR measurements [equations (16.14) to (16.17)] allows conclusions to be drawn concerning the size of the cooperative unit. If the two... [Pg.250]

As part of a process comparison campaign carried out at the ITU, a DIDPA flowsheet was implemented countercurrently in 24 miniature centrifugal contactors ... [Pg.144]

Tab. 5.3. process. Comparison of the domino- -Knoevenagel-hetero- Diels-Alder reaction with the stepwise ... [Pg.154]


See other pages where Process Comparisons is mentioned: [Pg.146]    [Pg.2226]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.223]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.260 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.38 ]




SEARCH



Coal process yields, comparison

Comparison Between Different Radiation and Scattering Processes

Comparison among Various Processing Methods

Comparison of Carbon Biogeochemical Processes in Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems

Comparison of Chemical and Radiation Processes

Comparison of Multi-step Indirect Solar Thermal Hydrogen Processes

Comparison of Process Technology Data for Bioreactors

Comparison of UV and EB Processes

Comparison of Whiskey Processes

Comparison of processes

Comparison of the sandwich moulding and structural foam processes

Comparison with other processes

Comparison, of different processes

Comparisons between reactivities of corresponding electrochemical and homogeneous redox processes

Concentrate processing comparison with other methods

Cost comparison of different cleaning processes

ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF REACTIVE DISTILLATION WITH A CONVENTIONAL PROCESS

Electrolysis processes, comparison

Forming process comparison

Mass spectrometry, mechanisms and structure in: a comparison with other chemical processes

Molding processes comparison

Petroleum processing, comparison

Plastic processing technologies process comparison

Polymerisation Process comparison

Process cost comparison

Process energy coat comparison

Short-contact-time processes, comparison

Solvent continued processes, comparison

Thermo-oxidative processes comparison

Vacuum deposition processes comparison

Wear resistance process comparisons

© 2024 chempedia.info