Preservative system selection

Formulators have many factors to consider when selecting an appropriate preservation system for a candidate metalworking fluid. There are three broad areas to consider ... 

The raw materials used in a particular product may present some challenges to the formulation chemist when selecting the most appropriate preservative. Problem ingredients may act as microbial nutrients, preservative inactivators or preservative adsorbers and careful testing and assessment of the preservative system is necessary in these cases. One notable example of this is the inactivation of parabens esters by certain non-ionic surfactants. 

All of the above environmental concerns are leading to restrictions being placed upon the use and composition of preservatives used to treat timber. Preservative systems of the future will therefore be selected not simply on the basis of criteria such as efficacy and cost, but also environmental impact, both during service and at the end of product lifetime. This will inevitably have economic implications. 

The selection of the preservative system for multiuse new products is the responsibility of the R D formulation group. Typical shelf specifications are 80 to 120% of label specifications. The appropriate preservative system for the particular formulation should be demonstrated to be effective by microbial challenge to at least 75% and preferably 50% of the target concentration. It is recommended that during development the product be formulated with preservative concentrations of 100, 75, and 50% of the labeled amount and be subjected to antimicrobial effectiveness testing to determine the lowest effective preservative concentration. 

Traegardh, C. Hallstrom, B. Energy Analysis of Selected Food Post-Harvest and Preservation Systems, Irradiators Compared to Conventional Food Preservation Methods. Res. Contract No. 2850/TC, report to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1981. 

It is expected that formulation scientists will use this information to benchmark their internal development protocols and reduce the time required to file by adopting formulae that have survived the test of time. Many of us who have worked in the pharmaceutical industry suffer from a fixed paradigm when it comes to selecting formulations Not invented here perhaps is kept in the back of the minds of many seasoned formulations scientists when they prefer certain platforms for development. It is expected that with a quick review of the formulation possibilities that are made available in this book such scientists would benefit from the experience of others. For teachers of formulation sciences this series offers a wealth of information. Whether it is selection of a preservative system or the choice of a disintegrant, the series offers many choices to study and consider. 

Description of the role of each excipient (e.g., surfactant, preservative) and cite requirements for the selection. Include discussion on the preservative system. 

Effectiveness of Preservative Manufacturing controls and shelf life must ensure that the specified preservative level is present and effective as part of the stability program [6], Depending on the type of product, the selection of the preservative system is based on different considerations, such as site of use, interactions,... 

An assessment must be performed and documented to determine the most appropriate method for preserving archives. Selection of the appropriate method must be considered within the context of the size, complexity, scope, and business impact of the system to be decommissioned. The method chosen must be documented using the appropriate Change Control form. 

Care should be taken in the selection of preservative systems to avoid interaction between preservatives and ingredients or packaging material that could inactivate the preservative, cause product instability, or irritation to skin [101]. 

For the teachers of formulation sciences, this series offers a wealth of information. Whether it is a selection of a preservative system or the choice of a disintegrant, the series offers a wide choice to study and rationalize. 

The most common system for the outer or secondary sealant used is based on polysulfide polymers cured with manganese dioxide where the physical properties have been modified by the use of a low-volatility plasticizer such as a higher phthalate. Recent developments have seen an increase in the use of polyurethanes because of their higher adhesion potential. All the systems are required to have oil resistance when used in timber windows (from the glazing putt and preservatives) (see Selection of joint sealant). 

Determination of micro-organism content. To estimate the micro-organism content of a sampled aliquot requires selecting subculture conditions (medium, temperature, dilution, incubation temperature and time) appropriate for unrestricted growth of the preservative-stressed micro-organisms, and adequate inactivation of the preservative system carried over in the sample aliquot. 

This example demonstrates the most challenging problem of flavor chemistry, ie, each flavor problem may require its own analytical approach however, a sensory analysis is always required. The remaining unknown odorants demand the most sensitive and selective techniques, and methods of concentration and isolation that preserve the sensory properties of complex and often dehcate flavors. Furthermore, some of the subtle odors in one system will be first identified in very different systems, like o-amino acetophenone in weasels and fox grapes. 

Liquid Dosage Forms. Simple aqueous solutions, symps, elixirs, and tinctures are prepared by dissolution of solutes in the appropriate solvent systems. Adjunct formulation ingredients include certified dyes, flavors, sweeteners, and antimicrobial preservatives. These solutions are filtered under pressure, often using selected filtering aid materials. The products are stored in large tanks, ready for filling into containers. QuaUty control analysis is then performed. 

Electrodes. At least three factors need to be considered ia electrode selection as the technical development of an electroorganic reaction moves from the laboratory cell to the commercial system. First is the selection of the lowest cost form of the conductive material that both produces the desired electrode reactions and possesses stmctural iategrity. Second is the preservation of the active life of the electrodes. The final factor is the conductivity of the electrode material within the context of cell design. An ia-depth discussion of electrode materials for electroorganic synthesis as well as a detailed discussion of the influence of electrode materials on reaction path (electrocatalysis) are available (25,26). A general account of electrodes for iadustrial processes is also available (27). 

As part of the design proeess, it is neeessary to inelude features in the formulation and delivery system to provide as mueh proteetion as possible against microbial eontaminahon and spoilage. Beeause of potenhal toxicity and irritancy problems, anhmicrobial preservatives should only be considered where there is clear evidence of posihve benefit. Manipulahon of physico-chemical parameters, such as A, the eliminahon of particularly suscephble ingredients, the selection of a preservahve or the choice of container may contribute significantly to overall medicine stability. 

---