Polyisoprene solubility

The first successhil use of lithium metal for the preparation of a i7j -l,4-polyisoprene was aimounced in 1955 (50) however, lithium metal catalysis was quickly phased out in favor of hydrocarbon soluble organ olithium compounds. These initiators provide a homogeneous system with predictable results. Organ olithium initiators are used commercially in the production of i7j -l,4-polyisoprene, isoprene block polymers, and several other polymers. 

The latex of the Sapota achras yields a thermoplastic material, chicle, consisting of about 17.4% hydrocarbon, 40% acetone soluble resin and 35% occluded water. The hydrocarbon appears to contain both trans- and c/s-polyisoprene. Although originally introduced as gutta pereha and natural rubber substitutes, deresinated chicle has become important as the base for chewing gum. Like other polyisoprenes, it is meeting competition from synthetic polymers. 

As pointed out earlier, acrylics differ from the commonly used rubber precursors for PSA formulation in the fact that they often incorporate polar monomers, such as acrylic acid, A-vinyl pyrrolidone, vinyl acetate, or acrylamide. As a result, the solubility parameters of acrylic polymers are typically higher than those of rubbers, like polyisoprenes or polybutadienes. 

The influence of the gel content in polyisoprene-tackifier blends on creep resistance and peel behaviour have been recently studied [62]. The gel content was achieved by cross-linking the adhesives with electron beam irradiation. The molecular weight of the soluble fraction in the blend was always dominated by that of the initial elastomer. Creep resistance was achieved either through molecular weight increases or gel content increases. However, the peel strength is strongly... 

Figure26-2. Biosynthesis of squalene, ubiquinone, dolichol, and other polyisoprene derivatives. (HMG, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl x, cytokinin.) A farnesyl residue is present in heme a of cytochrome oxidase. The carbon marked with asterisk becomes C or C,2 in squalene. Squalene synthetase is a microsomal enzyme all other enzymes indicated are soluble cytosolic proteins, and some are found in peroxisomes.

The hydrogenation of unsaturated polymers like polyisoprene is based on the mobility of a soluble catalyst in the reaction medium. In the hydrogenation of such unsaturated polymers the soluble catalyst brings its active site to the C=C bonds in the polymer chain. In contrast, a heterogeneous catalyst requires that the polymer chain unfold to gain access to a catalytically active site on the surface of a metal particle. 

Negative photoresists are formed from polymers that undergo reactions that decrease their solubility when exposed to radiation. Thus, polymers such as cA-l,4-polyisoprene (Equation 6.63) cross-link when exposed to the appropriate radiation giving insoluble products. 

Rubber is synthesized and sequestered on cytsolic vesicles known as rubber particles. Rubber transferase is localized to the surface of the rubber particles, and biosynthesis is initiated through the binding of an allylic pyrophosphate (APP, a pyrophosphate, produced by soluble trans- rtnyl transferases) primer. Progressive additions of IPP molecules ultimately result in the formation of high molecular weight cjT-l,4-polyisoprene. The rubber transferase also requires a divalent cation, such as Mg + or Mn +, as cofactor. 

The system Cl-buty 1-natural rubber (or cw-polyisoprene) could not be resolved by differential solvent techniques because the polymeric solubility parameters were too similar. At one end of the spectrum—i.e., with styrene at — 25 °C—natural rubber could be highly swollen while restricting the chlorobutyl swell, but the reverse was not possible, as indicated by the swelling volumes in the trimethylpentane. As displayed in Table II, attempts to use a highly symmetrically branched hydrocarbon with a very low solubility parameter, served only to reduce both the swelling of natural rubber and chlorobutyl. (Neopentane is a gas above 10°C and a solid below — 20°C). Therefore, for this report the use of differential solvents in the study of interfacial bonding in blends was limited to systems of Cl-butyl and cw-polybutadiene or SBR. 

The formation of coagulum is observed in all types of emulsion polymers (i) synthetic rubber latexes such as butadiene-styrene, acrylonitrile-butadiene, and butadiene-styrene-vinyl pyridine copolymers as well as polybutadiene, polychloroprene, and polyisoprene (ii) coatings latexes such as styrene-butadiene, acrylate ester, vinyl acetate, vinyl chloride, and ethylene copolymers (iii) plastisol resins such as polyvinyl chloride (iv) specialty latexes such as polyethylene, polytetrafluoroethylene, and other fluorinated polymers (v) inverse latexes of polyacrylamide and other water-soluble polymers prepared by inverse emulsion polymerization. There are no major latex classes produced by emulsion polymerization that are completely free of coagulum formation during or after polymerization. 

Amino-terminated telechelic polybutadiene was prepared by LiAlH4 reduction of amidino end-group in polybutadiene, which was polymerised by a water-soluble initiator, 2,2 -azobis(amidinopropane)dihydrochloride. The structure was analysed by 1H- and 13C-NMR, but functionality of 2.0 was obtained by a titration method [70]. Synthesis of co-epoxy-functionalised polyisoprene was carried out by the reaction of 2-bromoethyloxirane with living polymer that was initiated with sec-butyl lithium. The functionality of the resulting polyisoprene was 1.04 by 1H-NMR and 1.00 by thin layer chromatography detected with flame ionisation detection [71]. 

The system with which we have begun our investigations is the styrene-dimethylsiloxane system. The dimethylsiloxane blocks should be considerably less compatible with polystyrene blocks than either polybutadiene or polyisoprene since the solubility parameter of dimethylsiloxane is much farther from that of polystyrene than are the solubility parameters of polybutadienes or of polyisoprenes (17), no matter what their microstructure. Furthermore, even hexamers of polystyrene and of polydimethylsiloxane are immiscible at room temperature and have an upper critical-solution temperature above 35°C (18). In addition, the microphases in this system can be observed without staining and with no ambiguity about the identity of the phases in the transmission electron microscope (TEM) silicon has a much higher atomic number than carbon or oxygen, making the polydimethylsiloxane microphases the dark phases in TEM (19,20). 

The reaction of AIBN with different diols (1,4-butanediol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,2-propylene glycol, ethylene glycol) leads to di(x-hydroxyalkyl)-2,2 -azobisisobutyrate 34). The di(4-hydroxybutyl)-2,2 -azobisisobutyrate has many advantages compared to 4,4 -azobis (4-cyano-n-pentanol) an easy synthesis, a good solubility in hydrocarbons, no transfer reactions. This initiator yields functionalized polyisoprenes with a high molecular weight 26). Its catalytic efficiency is similar to that of the other initiators. 

Cyclohexane as the mobile phase requires the use of polyisoprene standards, as polystyrene standards are not soluble in this solvent. It should be noted that calibration by polystyrenes results in an overestimation of molar masses by a factor of around 2, compared to the use of polyisoprene standards [10]. It is, therefore, necessary to carry out universal calibration or to convert molar masses using the Mark-Houvink coefficients relative to synthetic or natural polyisoprenes [4,5,8,11,12]. 

If a polymer is easily soluble in a solvent, by convention, the solvent is called a good solvent, and the converse, it is a poor solvent [6], Therefore, a solvent whose 8 value is close to the 8 value of a polymer family is a good solvent for this polymer family. As examples, the 8 value of polystyrene (PS) is about 18, which is closer to the 8 value of 18.6 of tetrahydrofuran (THF) than the 8 value of 16.8 of cyclohexane (CH). Therefore, THF is expected to be a better solvent for PS than CH. For polyisoprene (PIP), the situation is reversed CH is a better solvent than THF. 

The standard molecular structural parameters that one would like to control in block copolymer structures, especially in the context of polymeric nanostructures, are the relative size and nature of the blocks. The relative size implies the length of the block (or degree of polymerization, i.e., the number of monomer units contained within the block), while the nature of the block requires a slightly more elaborate description that includes its solubility characteristics, glass transition temperature (Tg), relative chain stiffness, etc. Using standard living polymerization methods, the size of the blocks is readily controlled by the ratio of the monomer concentration to that of the initiator. The relative sizes of the blocks can thus be easily fine-tuned very precisely to date the best control of these parameters in block copolymers is achieved using anionic polymerization. The nature of each block, on the other hand, is controlled by the selection of the monomer for instance, styrene would provide a relatively stiff (hard) block while isoprene would provide a soft one. This is a consequence of the very low Tg of polyisoprene compared to that of polystyrene, which in simplistic terms reflects the relative conformational stiffness of the polymer chain. 

---