Physiochemical Relationships

Everything in Sections 9 and 10 on physiochemical relationships, and on polymers, mbbers, fats, oils, and waxes, respectively, has been retained. 

Electrochemical study of biologically active compounds at the O/W interface provides information on physiochemical properties of the compounds at the O/W interface and in the O and W phases or, in short, hydrophobicity or lipophilicity of biologically active compounds, which seems essential to understand their biological effects, including mode of action, structure-activity relationship, delivery, and others. 

Ghose, A. K. and Crippen, G. M. (1986) Atomic physiochemical parameters for three-dimensional structure-directed quantitative structure-activity relationships I. Partition coefficients as a measure of hydrophobicity. J. Comput. Chem. 4, 565-577. 

A comprehensive piece of work on predicting VDSS from physiochemical data was reported by Poulin and Thiel for both rat and human [28]. The experimental input data required is the plasma protein binding, blood cell partitioning, octanokwater partition ratio, and olive oikwater partition ratio. The underlying relationship utilized was ... 

Mailhot, H. and Peters, R.H. Empirical relationships between the 1-octanolAvater partition coefficient and nine physiochemical properties. Environ. Sci. Technol, 22(12) 1479-1488, 1988. 

Regression equations descriptive of multi-dimensional structure/ activity relationships in quantitative terms too frequently are intellectual curiosities developed retrospectively after work in optimization of the biological properties of a series by analog or homolog synthesis has been completed. Retrospective analysis serves well to document that critical factors in the relationship between structural features/physiochemical factors and biological potency are well understood and that optimum compounds have been achieved. Structure/activity understanding developed during the course of a synthesis project, however, lends direction and efficiency to the property optimization effort. 

Harju M, Andersson, PL, Haglund P, et al. 2002. Multivariate physiochemical characterization and quantitative structure-property relationship modelling of polybrominated diphenyl ethers. Chemosphere 47 375-384. 

A strict relationship should exist between toxicity (the average value of the indicated toxicity parameters in the case of the organism analyzed) and the monitoring parameter of the chemical load of the sediment sample (the total concentration of the indicated parameter in relation to the average value of this parameter across all the samples analyzed) (Figure 9.1). A condition of the appearance of such a relationship is that the spectrum of these physiochemical parameters mirrors the factors that actually pollute the environmental compartments under scrutiny and indicate toxicity in relation to biota. 

In field-flow fractionation (FFF), retention can be related through a well-defined equation to the applied held and governing physicochemical parameters of the analyte. Therefore, in principle, FFF is a primary measurement technique that does not require calibration, but only if the governing physiochemical parameters are either the analyte parameters of interest or their relationship to the parameter of interest (such a molecular weight) is well deflned. 

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) dates back to the nineteenth century and is a computer-based tool that attempts to correlate variations in structural or molecular properties of compounds with their biological activities. These physicochemical descriptors, which include parameters to account for hydrophobicity, topology, electronic properties, and steric effects, are determined empirically or, more recently, by computational methods. The premise is that the structure of a chemical determines the physiochemical properties and reactivities that underlie its biological and toxicological properties. Being able to predict potential adverse effects not only aids in the designed development of new chemicals but also reduces the need for animal testing. It may ultimately or potentially lead to better... 

Another reason for determining the potency of different ecotoxicants is to establish structure-activity relationships. In ecotoxicology, these can be used to predict the toxicity of new compounds that share the molecular or physiochemical properties of chemical classes for which structure-activity relationships have been established. The relationships could be derived with fish but can be done more quickly and at less cost with cells. As a result, fish cell lines have been used to develop structure-cytotoxicity relationships for several chemical categories184. The cytotoxicity of lipophilic chemicals was predicted by their octanol/water coefficient184 176. The cytotoxicity of metals was predicted by chemical hardness184. 

Huang, Q.-G., Song, W,-L. and Wang, L.-S. (1997) Quantitative relationship between the physiochemical characteristics as well as genotoxicity of organic pollutants and molecular autocorrelation topological descriptors. Chemosphere, 35, 2849-2855. 

Physiochemical Log P, atomic charges, linear-free energy relationships... 

The physiochemical basis for chemical respiratory allergy remains to be elucidated. Not only would this assist in the development of appropriate models of structure-activity relationships for use in the predictive assessment of respiratory sensitization potential, but also provide important clues as to the... 

Use of this equation permitted correlation of a fair amount of data (5, 21, 22) and led Edwards and Pearson (22) to discover the much-discussed a effect (enhanced reactivity for nucleophiles having an unshared pair of electrons on the atom adjacent to the nucleophilic atom) as yet a third factor controlling nucleophilicity. Subsequently, Pearson et al. (5) compared Swain-Scott n values for methyl iodide and trans-Pt(py)2Cl2 reacting with a diverse set of nucleophiles and found no relationship between the n values. Attempts to use the Edwards and related equations to correlate the results also failed, and the conclusion was made that present understanding was inadequate to permit quantitative prediction of rates for a wide variety of substrates. This pessimistic conclusion still holds, but work continues in the search for the key physiochemical properties controlling nucleophilic reactivity (23). 

---