Farming pesticides

GoreU JM, Johnson CC, Rybicki BA, Peterson EL, Richardson RJ (1998) The risk of Parkinson s disease with exposure to pesticides, farming, well water, and rural hving. Neurology 50 1346-1350 Green M, Howman E (2004) Semiconductor quantum dots and free radical induced DNA nicking. Chem Comm 121 121-123... 

Inefficient food production due to lack of knowledge, skills, seeds, improved animals, feeds, fertilizer, pesticides, farming equipment, and irrigation. 

Sustainable Agriculture. The third factor that will influence the future of pesticide sales is the emphasis on sustainable agriculture systems that rely on more natural pest control methods and reduced pesticide usage. These are integrated systems that requke nutrients and crop protection chemicals from on-farm natural sources and cultural methods. Many current sustainable farms are site-specific systems that may depend on the soils in a... 

MAFF/SOAFD Pesticide Usage Survey Group, Arable Farm Crops in Great Britain 1994, 1995. Water Research Council, Atmospheric Sources of PoUntion. Inputs of Trace Organics to Surface Waters, R D Report No. 20, Water Research Council, 1995. 

Control of substances hazardous to health regulations. Ionizing Radiations Regulations 1999 Control of lead at Work Regulations 1998 MAFF/HSC Code of Practice for the safe use of pesticides on farms and holdings. 

Agricultural pesticides and other chemicals used in farming ... 

Melnyk LJ, Berry MR, Sheldon LS. 1997. Dietary exposure from pesticide application on farms in the agricultural health pilot study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 7 61-80. 

The only study located regarding immunological effects in humans after dermal exposure to endosulfan was an account of the results of patch tests on the backs of 14 farm workers with work-related dermatitis and 8 controls who were not exposed to pesticides (Schuman and Dobson 1985). Skin sensitization was not observed in any of the subjects following a 48-hour, closed-patch exposure to an unspecified amount of 0.1 % endosulfan in petrolatum. 

Exposures of Children. Data need to be developed to properly assess the exposure of infants who eat processed baby foods containing residues of pesticides such as endosulfan. Several studies have estimated exposure based on endosulfan concentration found in foods typically eaten by infants however, no studies that directly studied infant exposure could be located. Attention should also be given to infant formulas and to the tap water used to prepare infant formulas from condensed or powdered forms. More data are also required to properly assess endosulfan exposure to children who live, play, or attend school near farmlands that are treated with endosulfan. Maps that catalog endosulfan use on crops and present average application rates would better allow an assessment of the potential for children in farming communities to be exposed. The possibility that farming parents work clothes and shoes may carry endosulfan residues into the home also should be studied. In addition, home use of endosulfan, which may result in exposure of children, needs to be investigated. 

Greig-Smith, P.W., Frampton, G., and Hardy, A.R. (1992). Pesticides, Cereal Farming, and the Environment the Boxworth Experiment. London HMSO. 

Substances hazardous to health include substances labelled as dangerous (i.e. very toxic, toxic, harmful, irritant or corrosive) under any other statutory requirements, agricultural pesticides and other chemicals used on farms, and substances with occupational exposure limits. They include harmful micro-organisms and substantial quantities of dust. Indeed any material, mixture or compound used at work, or arising from work activities, which can harm people s health is apparently covered. 

Preventing Access to Effluent Storage and Similar Areas on Farms Guidance on Storing Pesticides for Earmers and other Professional Users Safe Use of Rodenticides on Earms and Holdings Farmer s Lung... 

Another important test location factor is the availability of water for irrigation and for preparation of the spray solution. The use of culinary water sources (either private or public water sources intended for human consumption) or groundwater (from wells) is usually less problematic than using water from surface sources (rivers, lakes, or canals). If surface water is used for the study, care must be taken to ensure that farm production activities upstream from the plot area have not contaminated the water supply with pesticides that could contaminate the plot area. Careful site selection will help avoid problems from the water available at the site. 

When the trial site is not on a special research facility, the evaluation and selection of held investigators (farmers) may be difficult. The best trial results are normally obtained from those trials conducted on farms where the farmers or techni-cians/agronomists involved with the normal application of pesticides on the farm are involved in the conduct of the trial, and are aware of the objectives so that they avoid treating the trial area with products likely to interfere with the analysis. 

Farm worker exposure to pesticides has been studied extensively over the past 30 years.This scientitic discipline has evolved from the days when respiratory exposure of farm workers was measured using gauze dosimeters placed inside respirators to collect airborne pesticide residues to very sophisticated air sampling devices and remarkable dosimeter devices to measure dermal exposure to farm workers. ... 

Among the first dermal dosimeters used in exposure research were 4 x 4-in cellulose or gauze patches which were pinned to the outer and inner surfaces of clothing or vests which farm workers would wear during the application or re-entry phase of the smdy. These patches were easy to manufacture and when pinned to the shirt or pants of the worker made for an easily used dosimeter pad. The major advantage to the use of the patch to estimate worker exposure was this method s ability to differentiate the relative contributions of pesticide residues to different parts of the worker s body. This sampling technique in turn could lead to recommendations (i.e., the use of... 

The purpose of this article is to present a detailed description of the current field methods for collection of samples while measuring exposure of pesticides to farm workers. These current field methods encompass detailed descriptions of the methods for measuring respiratory and also dermal exposure for workers who handle the pesticide products directly (mixer-loaders and applicators) and for re-entry workers who are exposed to pesticide dislodgeable residues when re-entering treated crops. 

One of the most important aspects of designing a successful worker exposure or re-entry study is the selection of the agricultural site at which to perform the study. One must first define the growing region in which the pesticide is to be used to the widest extent possible. This is important since this region would have the most farms, farmers, commercial applicators, or re-entry workers which would have work habits, equipment, and land, which would best represent the use of the product. 

The duration of sampling and size of biological samples used to monitor pesticide exposure in farm workers... 

---