Nuclear transport, and

The Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material came into force in 1987. This Convention prescribes the levels at which nuclear material used for peaceful purposes is to be protected while in international nuclear transport, and requires each party to the Convention not to permit the export or import of such material unless it is satisfied that the nuclear material will be protected at those levels. 

Because many steps in lentiviral infection (reverse transcription, nuclear transport, and integration) depend on cellular cofactors (65, 66, 68-70), there may be serious limitations in the use of nonhuman lentiviral vectors in primary human tissues. Replication of lentivimses is highly adapted to their natural host, indicating that cross species variability of cellular factors essential for vims replication, and thus vector transduction, may impair the transduction efficiency of nonhuman lentiviral vectors in human cells. These restrictions may be overcome by the use of chimeric lentiviral vectors. Indeed, cross-packaging of FIVRNAby HIV-1 and SIV packaging systems has been demonstrated, and viral proteins were able to... 

Ser/Thr O-linked Gn is found primarily in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus. The role of O-Gn as regulating modification is not completely understood. O-Gncylation appears to be as abundant as phosphorylation, and is a highly dynamic and a regulated process [141]. O-Gn may have a role in modulating either the phosphorylation state or the assembly and disassembly of multimeric protein complexes in several major cellular systems including transcription, nuclear transport, and cytoskeletal organization [142]. 

Details of the activation and transport into the nucleus remain unknown. Additional proteins like RAP46 have been identified that function in cooperation with the chaperones and participate in nuclear transport and also activation of the receptor. After dissociation of the heat shock proteins, the hormone-receptor complex is capable of specific binding on the HRE and of transactivation. 

When people have no personal control they may place their trust in others to keep the situation safe. Again it is a question of whether the assessment is accurate and whether the trust is justifiably placed. The work of VIek Stallen ° suggests that one of the clusters of beliefs characterising those who oppose large nuclear, transport and chemical plant developments is personal insecurity and lack of trust in those controlling the technology. The situation is made worse by the spectacle of experts disagreeing violently with each other about the safety issues of the developments in question. 

The use of nuclear power has been a topic of debate for many years. Nuclear fuel represents a resource for generating energy weU into the future, whereas economically recoverable fossil fuel reserves may become depleted. Worker exposure, injuries, and fataHties in nuclear fuel mining are reportedly far less compared to those associated with recovery and handling of fossil fuels. Potential hazards associated with transporting and storing radioactive wastes do exist, however. 

The NRC has developed special procedures for the handling, transportation, and storage of nuclear fuel because radioactivity can be a health hazard if not properly shielded. Spent fuel is typically transported by rail or tmck in heavily shielded (Type B), sealed, thick metal shipping containers designed to withstand possible accidents, such as derailments or coHisions, which may occur during transport. The NRC certifies that each shipping container meets federal requirements. The U.S. Department of Transportation sets the rules for transportation. 

Department of Defense - requires that a PSA be performed according to MIL-STD-882A for any major acllvity or undertaking, e.g., analyses of the transportation of nuclear weapons and deactivatioti of chemical weapons. 

Environmental Protection Agency - has sponsored work on the risk of chemical manufacture and transportation, the risk of reprocessing nuclear fuel, and the risk of nuclear waste disposal. 

Department of Energy - has sponsored analyses of its reactors and process facilities, the risks of the breeder reactor, the risk of nuclear material transportation and disposal, and the risks of several fuel cycles. 

Chapter 6 was concerned, with determining the probability of various failures leading to insufficient core cooling of a nuclear reactor. This chapter describes how the accident effects are calculated as the accident progresses from radionuclide release, radionuclide migration within the plant, escape from retaining structures, atmospheric radionuclide transport and the public health effects. 

The analysis of the consequences of nuclear accidents began with physical concepts of core melt, discussed the mathematical and code models of radionuclide release and transport within the plant to its release into the environment, models for atmospheric transport and the calculation of health effects in humans. After the probabilities and consequences of the accidents have been determined, they must be assembled and the results studied and presented to convey the meanings. 

This technique is the longest established of all the human reliability quantification methods. It was developed by Dr. A. D. Swain in the late 1960s, originally in the context of military applications. It was subsequently developed further in the nuclear power industry. A comprehensive description of the method and the database used in its application, is contained in Swain and Guttmann (1983). Further developments are described in Swain (1987). The THERP approach is probably the most widely applied quantification technique. This is due to the fact that it provides its own database and uses methods such as event trees which are readily familiar to the engineering risk analyst. The most extensive application of THERP has been in nuclear power, but it has also been used in the military, chemical processing, transport, and other industries. 

The SLIM technique is described in detail in Embrey et al. (1984) and Kirwan (1990). The technique was originally developed with the support of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission but, as with TFIERP, it has subsequently been used in the chemical, transport, and other industries. The technique is intended to be applied to tasks at any level of detail. Thus, in terms of the HTA in Figure 5.6, errors could be quantified at the level of whole tasks, subtasks, task steps of even individual errors associated with task steps. This flexibility makes it particularly useful in the context of task analysis methods such as FITA. 

---