Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act, New Jersey State Assembly N.J.S. A 13 IB-3, State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, Trenton, N.J., Sept. 12, 1985. [Pg.103]

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 1993. Ground water quality standards. Department of Environmental Protection. Division of Water Quality. NAJC 7 9-6. http //www.state.ni. us/deo/. [Pg.308]

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection uses the TXDS method of consequence analysis to estimate potentially catastrophic quantities of toxic substances, as required by the New Jersey Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act (TCPA). An acute toxic concentration (ATC) is defined as the concentration of a gas or vapor of a toxic substance that will result in acute health effects in the affected population and 1 fatality out of 20 or less (5% or more) during a 1-hr exposure. ATC values, as proposed by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, are estimated for 103 extraordinarily hazardous substances and are based on the lowest value of one of the following (1) the lowest reported lethal concentration (LCLO) value for animal test data, (2) the median lethal concentration (LC50) value from animal test data multiplied by 0.1, or (3) the IDLH value. [Pg.203]

Reginald Baldini of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection... [Pg.6]

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy is presently considering amendment of its TCPA to establish coverage of reactive hazards that might affect the public. The State has asked for stakeholder input on the following proposition (paraphrased) ... [Pg.356]

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. (2003). Final Report of the New Jersey comparative risk project, Draft report. Trenton, NJ. [Pg.168]

Dr. Ezikpe Akuma, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Reginald Baldini, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Michael P. Broadribb, BP America, Inc. [Pg.466]

Asit Ray, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Thomas Scherpa, DuPont Engineering Technologies Milt Wooldridge, MRW Associates, Inc. [Pg.466]

Bozzelli JW, Kebbekus BB. 1979. Analysis of selected volatile organic substances in ambient air. Report to New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Program on Environmental Cancer and Toxic Substances, by New Jersey Institute of Technology, Air Pollution Research Laboratory. [Pg.240]

According to Robert T. Mueller of the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), demonstrations conducted by the vendor have supported the premise that the cost to vitrify waste into nonleachable materials is substantially lower than the excavation and relocation of these materials to regulated landfills as a means of permanent disposal (D17164M,... [Pg.626]

New Jersey Administrative Code, State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Safe Drinking Water, Safe Drinking Water Act Regulations, 7 10-5.2. See also New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection http //www.state.nj.us/dep/... [Pg.548]

George Eadon, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY Peter B. Farmer, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom Gary Ginsberg, Connecticut Department of Public health, Hartford, CT Carol J. Henry, American Chemistry Council, Arlington, VA Nina T. Holland, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA Gunnar Johanson, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Branden B. Johnson, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ... [Pg.6]

Hance, B.J., C. Chess, and P.M. Sandman. 1988. Improving Dialogue with Communities A Risk Communication Manual for Government. Trenton NJ New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. [Pg.259]

Weinstein, N.D. 1986. Public Perceptions of Environmental Hazards Study 1 Final Report Statewide Poll of Environmental Perceptions. Trenton, NJ New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Science and Research. [Pg.262]

The first observations of a possible atmospheric CH4 increase were reported by Graedel and McRae (1980), who analyzed a 10-year continuous record of total hydrocarbon (THC) data collected at three urban/suburban sites by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. An increasing trend in daily and annual minima was advanced somewhat tentatively because of concerns about cahbration techniques, the fraction of the THC signal attributable to CH4, and the urban locations. Rasmussen and Khalil (1981) used 22 months of automated GC/FID measurements of atmospheric CH4 at Cape Meares, OR, to show a CH4 concentration increase of —2% yr. Rasmussen and Khalil (1981) also compiled independent northern hemisphere GC/FID measurements from 1965 to 1980 to show a similar trend. The Cape Meares station has operated almost continuously since early 1979 and the techniques were used in establishing the NOAA network described below. [Pg.1981]

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Site Remediation and Waste Management Program. New Jersey superfund sites, www.nj.gov/dep/... [Pg.349]

For the NJDEP (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection NJDEP, 2007 Poretti and Franken, 2008) 40 lakes are sampled 3 times per year (spring, summer and fall). The trophic status of the 40 lakes was determined on the basis of Carlson s Trophic State Index (TSI), linked to TP, transparency and levels of chlorophyll-a ... [Pg.35]

OEC was selected for the Bog Creek site, due to the particulate emissions criteria set by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). The primary problem encountered during the start-up at the Prentiss site was higher-than-expected fines carryover. About 50% of the ash output was from the air pollution control system. The Bog Creek site was located near the New Jersey coastline where the soil is naturally sandy. The existing particulate emission limit of 0.03 grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf) or 0.07 grams per dry standard cubic meter (g/dscm) was reduced to a more rigorous standard of 0.015 gr/dscf (0.034 g/dscm) for this site, to prevent contaminated sand from entering the atmosphere. [Pg.258]

Hance, B. Chess, C. Sandman, P. Improving Dialogue with Communities New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection New Brunswick, NJ, 1988. [Pg.1970]


See other pages where New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection is mentioned: [Pg.295]    [Pg.1293]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.36]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.200 , Pg.203 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.295 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.295 ]




SEARCH



Department of Environmental Protection

Environmental Department

Environmental protection

Jersey

New Jersey

© 2024 chempedia.info