Department of Environmental Protection

Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act, New Jersey State Assembly N.J.S. A 13 IB-3, State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, Trenton, N.J., Sept. 12, 1985. [Pg.103]

Ms. Sue Vaughn, Title III Coordinator State Emergency Response Commission Department of Environmental Protection State Office Building, Room 161 165 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT06106 (203) 566-4856... [Pg.101]

Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection 18 Reilly Road Frankfort. KY 40601 (502) 564-2150... [Pg.102]

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 1993. Ground water quality standards. Department of Environmental Protection. Division of Water Quality. NAJC 7 9-6. http //www.state.ni. us/deo/. [Pg.308]

Atkeson T, Axelrad D, Pollman C, Keeler G. 2003. Integrating atmospheric mercury deposition and aquatic cycling in the Florida Everglades an approach for conducting a total maximum daily load analysis for an atmospherically derived pollutant. Tallahassee (FL) Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) (http //www. floridadep.org/labs/mercury/index.htm). [Pg.82]

Engstrom DR, Polhnan CD, Fitzgerald WF, Balcom PH. 2003. Evaluation of recent trends in atmospheric mercury deposition in south florida from lake-sediment records. Tallahassee (FL) Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 27 pp. [Pg.83]

Loftus WF, Trexler JC, Jones RD. 1998. Mercury transfer through an Everglades aquatic food web. Dept, of Biol. Sci. and SE Environ. Res. Prog., Florida International University Final Report to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, December 1998, contract SP-329. [Pg.180]

USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency. No specified time interval between field measurements. If the purge volume is small, collect measurements with enough frequency to evaluate stabihty. If the purge volume is large, take field measurements approximately 15 min apart. FLDEP = Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Allowable variation between two consecutive readings taken at least 2-3 min apart following the collection of one well volume. ... [Pg.806]

Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Standard Operating Procedures for Field... [Pg.816]

NJ DEP, Underground Storage Tanks (USTs), Site Remediation and Waste Management, NJ Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ, November 2006. [Pg.756]

FIGURE 21.9 Schematic diagram of the IP Jay Paper Mill showing points of discharge to wastewater treatment plant. (Taken from U.S. EPA, International Paper XL-2 Effluent Improvements Project, Final Report, U.S. EPA, Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Jay, Maine, September 6, 2005.)... [Pg.899]

Eremita, P.M., Maine Department of Environmental Protection, E-mail to Aaron Hastings, Tetra Tech EM Inc. Christy s in N. Windham, August 16, 2000. [Pg.1054]

MA Div Air Quality Control. 1998. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality Control. Mass Admin Code Section 173-460. [Pg.192]

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection uses the TXDS method of consequence analysis to estimate potentially catastrophic quantities of toxic substances, as required by the New Jersey Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act (TCPA). An acute toxic concentration (ATC) is defined as the concentration of a gas or vapor of a toxic substance that will result in acute health effects in the affected population and 1 fatality out of 20 or less (5% or more) during a 1-hr exposure. ATC values, as proposed by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, are estimated for 103 extraordinarily hazardous substances and are based on the lowest value of one of the following (1) the lowest reported lethal concentration (LCLO) value for animal test data, (2) the median lethal concentration (LC50) value from animal test data multiplied by 0.1, or (3) the IDLH value. [Pg.203]

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy is presently considering amendment of its TCPA to establish coverage of reactive hazards that might affect the public. The State has asked for stakeholder input on the following proposition (paraphrased) ... [Pg.356]

CT Bureau Air Manage. 1998. Hazardous air pollutant. Connecticut Bureau of Air Management, Departement of Environmental Protection. Reg. 22a-174. [Pg.207]

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. (2003). Final Report of the New Jersey comparative risk project, Draft report. Trenton, NJ. [Pg.168]

One example of a successful monitoring program is that coordinated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, mentioned earlier. Because the monitoring program includes analyzing seawater and shellfish for K. brevis and brevetoxin concentrations, respectively, and because emergency-response plans require authorities to close shellfish harvesting when the shellfish become toxic, the incidence of NSP in Florida is low. [Pg.181]

Dr. Ezikpe Akuma, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Reginald Baldini, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Michael P. Broadribb, BP America, Inc. [Pg.466]

Asit Ray, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Thomas Scherpa, DuPont Engineering Technologies Milt Wooldridge, MRW Associates, Inc. [Pg.466]

Recently, in New Jersey, the Department of Environmental Protection developed preliminary health-based drinking water guidance for PFOA of 40 ng/L (http //www.defendinscience.org/case studiesAipload/pfoa dwguidance.pdf). [Pg.367]

Bozzelli JW, Kebbekus BB. 1979. Analysis of selected volatile organic substances in ambient air. Report to New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Program on Environmental Cancer and Toxic Substances, by New Jersey Institute of Technology, Air Pollution Research Laboratory. [Pg.240]

Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...