Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nevada Power Plant

In conclusion, whole-tire-to-energy power plants with a reciprocating grate system and state-of-the-art air pollution controls have proven practical, both in the U.S. and West Germany. With the completion of the Sterling plant, there will be the capacity in the U.S. to turn 14 million tires per year into electricity. It must be emphasized that two keys to successful operation of such plants are proximity to tire sources and adequate buy-back rates for the electricity generated by the plants. [Pg.58]


The widespread availabiHty of electrical energy completely transformed modem society and enabled a host of breakthroughs in manufacturing, medical science, communications, constmction, education, and transportation. Centralized fossil fuel-powered, steam-turbine-based power plants remain the dominant means of electricity production. However, hydropower faciHties such as the 1900-MW Hoover Dam Power Project located on the Arizona—Nevada border, commissioned by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation during the 1930s, have also made significant contributions. [Pg.1]

In 1969 Air Products Chemicals began delivering carbon dioxide and hydrogen to customers in the Houston area via pipeline. There was also talk of shipping methanol by pipeline. A 273-mile pipeline was also opened in 1969 to convey 660 tons/hr of slurried coal from Kayenta, Arizona, to a power plant in southern Nevada. A previous coal pipeline in Ohio closed down in the mid-1960s because it proved to be uneconomical when the railroads reduced their rates.5... [Pg.30]

The first way is pipeline transport of concentrated coal-water slurry. It assumes that utilisation of coal particle distribution preparation and/or using the various additives can substantially increase mass concentration of coal-water slurry till 70-80 %. For example, Black Messa Pipeline realised in USA transports 4.8 million tons of coal per year over the distance 439 km from the colliery in North Arizona to power plant Mohave near the border of Nevada and California with mass ratio of coal to water about 1 1, without using any additives, [5]. Recently, in the USA, Italy, China, Russia and other countries several coal pipelines were already realised. Even Oil and gas should be effectively transported as hydrate slurries, [6],... [Pg.374]

A fourth facility, the Moapa Energy Project, is planned for construction in Moapa, Nevada, about 50 miles northeast of Las Vegas. The plant would require 15 million tires per year to generate 49 MW per hour, and would sell power to Nevada Power. The environmental impact statement and air emissions permits for this facility have been accepted, and public hearings are upcoming. Construction may begin in 1992, with operation commencing in 1993.1... [Pg.170]

The largest scrap tire combustion system is the Oxford Energy plant in Modesto, California. It consumes about 4.9 million tires per year and generates 14 MW of power. A second Oxford Energy power plant, designed to bum about 9 to 10 million tires per year has been build in Connecticut. Two others may be built in Nevada and New York. Also, two Firestone plants have installed pulsating floor furnaces to dispose of scrap tires and other solid wastes here, process steam is generated as a by-product. [Pg.360]

In even larger installations, one solution is the storage of heat in high-temperature (400°C or higher) oil or in molten salt. Hot oil storage is more common, but in other cases such as the 64 mW solar power plant called Solar One, in Boulder City, Nevada, excess solar energy is planned to be stored in molten salt. These plants store the molten salt at high temperature and when electricity... [Pg.81]

Other installations include one by a Spanish company named Acciona Energy, which recently started up a 64-mW solar thermal power plant near Boulder City in Nevada. This company is also planning two thermal solar plants in southern Spain (50 mW each) in Palma del Rio for an investment of 0.5 billion euros. [Pg.97]

In Boulder City, Nevada, in 2006 the construction of a 250 million, 64 mW solar thermal power plant named Solar One started. It uses Schott s new PTR 70 solar receivers and is built by Solargenix Energy. [Pg.98]

On April 26, 1986, one of the 1000-MW nuclear power plants in Chernobyl had a devastating accident that released over 10 Bq of radioactivity into the environment. By far, the highest release was from Xe, of which at least 2x10 Bq (100% of the noble gas inventory and incidentally the equivalent radioxenon of a 200-kiloton nuclear detonation) was released. Elevated concentrations of Xe at levels as high as 400 Bq/m were detected in Europe and as far away as the United States in noble gas monitoring systems in California, Nevada, and Utah. ... [Pg.47]

The son of a civil engineer, young Kieran moved every few years as his dad went about building power plants, pulp mills, and other major infrastructure projects—the sort of projects that tend to make environmentalists cringe. They lived in Nevada and Peru, and in the shadow of an oil-fired power plant on Cape Cod. A nuclear power station in South Korea would have been next if his parents had not split up. He and his mother stayed in Cape Cod, where he attended high school in Sandwich and toyed with the idea—not for the last... [Pg.106]

Just over 20% of the electricity generated in the United States is produced by nuclear power plants. In 1995, 32,200 metric tons of spent fuel, with a total activity of 30,200 MCi, was stored by the electric utilities at 70 sites (either in pools or in dry storage systems) (Ahearne 1997, Richardson 1997). By 2020, the projected inventory will be 77,100 metric tons of heavy metal (MTHM) with a total activity of 34,600 MCi. Although the volume of the spent fuel is only a few percent of the volume of HLW, over 95% of the total activity (defense-related plus commercially generated waste) is associated with the commercially generated spent nuclear fuel (Crowley 1997). At present in the United States, none of the spent fuel will be reprocessed all is destined for direct disposal in a geological repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada (Hanks et al. 1999). [Pg.674]

Plutonium is considered a transuranium (having an atomic number greater than that of uranium) element. It has a very long radiological half-life (86 and 24,000 years for plutonium-238 and -239, respectively), and, therefore, the radioactivity diminishes very slowly. Spent nuclear fuel is not reprocessed in the United States at the present time, and the fuel must be disposed of intact (Lamarsh 1983). The usual method of disposal has been to place the fuel in suitable containers and bury them in a waste repository. Prior to 1970 solid wastes containing radioactive wastes generated by nuclear power plants were buried at commercial waste sites located at Sheffield, Illinois Beatty, Nevada Morehead, Kentucky Richland, Washington and West Valley, New York. As of 1974 approximately 80 kg of plutonium was contained in this waste (Daly and Kluk 1975). [Pg.93]

The 165 million cost of Hoover Dam has been repaid, with interest, to the federal treasury through the sale of its power. Hoover Dam enei is marketed by the Western Area Power Administration to 15 entities in Arizona, California, and Nevada under contracts that expire in 2017. More than half, 56%, goes to southern California users Arizona contractors receive 19%, and Nevada users get 25%. The revenues from the sale of this power now pay for the dam s operation and maintenance. The power contractors also paid for the uprating of the power plant s nameplate capacity from 1.3 million to over 2.0 million kW... [Pg.369]

Forsberg, C. W. 2006d, Developments in Molten Salt and Liquid-Salt-Cooled Reactors, Paper 6292 CD-KOM), International Congress on Advanced Nuclear Power Plants, June 4-8, 2006, Reno, Nevada. [Pg.70]

Another problem with nuclear power plants is their radioactive waste production. The United States has debated where and how to permanently store nuclear wastes. In July 2002, an underground site was authorized at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, about 90 miles north of Las Vegas. The Yucca Mountain facility was closed in 2009. A permanent site for nuclear waste storage has not yet been decided upon. [Pg.455]

Worldwide, the trend through the 2000 s has been toward ever larger scale centralized PV power plants, as typified by a 14-megawatt plant in Nevada and a... [Pg.1675]

A second problem associated with nuclear power is waste disposal. Although the amormt of nuclear fuel used in electricity generation is small compared to other fuels, the products of the reaction are radioactive and have very long half-lives (thousands of years or more). What do we do with this waste Currently, in the United States, nuclear waste is stored on site at the nuclear power plants. A permanent disposal site was being developed in Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The site had originally been scheduled to be operational in 2010, and that date was later delayed to 2017. However, the Obama administration determined that the Yucca Mountain site was untenable, and in the spring of 2010, the license application to develop this... [Pg.630]


See other pages where Nevada Power Plant is mentioned: [Pg.58]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.883]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.782]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.126]   


SEARCH



Nevada

Power plants

© 2024 chempedia.info