Model of Interfacial Structure

For a total relaxation, the relation between MFD distance and the respective lattice plane distance d as well as the lattice mismatch / is given 

Support and discussions by and with T. Paskova, K. Muller, A. Rosenauer, S. Figge, D. Honunel, A. Rosenauer, R. Kersting, B. Monemar, F. Tuomisto, and P. Fini are gratefully acknowledged. The research was in part carried out with the support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under the project number FOR-506/KR-2195. 

Paskova, T., Kroger, R., Figge, S. et al. (2006) Applied Physics Ixtters, 89, 051914. 

Bougrov, V., Levinshtein, M.E., Rumyantsev, S.L, and Zubrilov, A. (2001) Gallium Nitride (GaN), in Properties of Advanced SemiconductorMaterials GaN, AlN, 

Levinshtein, S.L. Rumyantsev, and M.S. Shur, John Wiley Sons, Ltd, New York. 

---

Those using analytical methods (often via perturbation approaches, which necessitate some level of approximation such as linearization of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation) to incorporate increasing complexity into the model of interfacial structure. 

Orientational distributions near the interface are rather broad consequently, simple discrete-state models of interfacial structure are unrealistic. 

Fig. 13 Assumed models of interfacial structure of a PVA hydrogels of different water contents in contact with water.

Until very recently, most of the publications in this area of electrochemistry reported mainly experimental results. However, in the last few years, theoreticians started to take interest in what must be a new green pasture for them, and as a result few models of interfacial structure or charge transfer processes have been proposed. 

In the mid-1980s, Koryta followed another approach to the determination of ion transfer kinetics based on the measurement of salt extraction kinetics. The basis of this approach is that when a salt is extracted from one phase to another, then the flux of the cation must be equal to the flux of the anion to maintain the electroneutrality of the phases. The extraction rate is followed poten-tiometrically, and the measured Galvani potential difference can be related to kinetic parameters via the assumption of a model of interfacial structure. However, when the inteifacial extraction rate is rapid, as in the case for salt extraction at liquid-liquid interfaces, the overall extraction is influenced by the rates of mass transport on either on the interface.Therefore, this approach is not accurate enough to be a valuable tool for the measurement of ion transfer kinetics. 

The non-steady-state optical analysis introduced by Ding et al. also featured deviations from the Butler-Volmer behavior under identical conditions [43]. In this case, the large potential range accessible with these techniques allows measurements of the rate constant in the vicinity of the potential of zero charge (k j). The potential dependence of the ET rate constant normalized by as obtained from the optical analysis of the TCNQ reduction by ferrocyanide is displayed in Fig. 10(a) [43]. This dependence was analyzed in terms of the preencounter equilibrium model associated with a mixed-solvent layer type of interfacial structure [see Eqs. (14) and (16)]. The experimental results were compared to the theoretical curve obtained from Eq. (14) assuming that the potential drop between the reaction planes (A 0) is zero. The potential drop in the aqueous side was estimated by the Gouy-Chapman model. The theoretical curve underestimates the experimental trend, and the difference can be associated with the third term in Eq. (14). 

Mechanisms deduced from the use of AFM are based on model systems and it is necessary to establish that these conclusions apply in commercial foams and emulsions imder realistic processing conditions. Molecular understanding of interfacial structures offers the prospect for rational modification or design of interfacial structure. In the case of emulsions this requires understanding how interfacial structures control droplet-droplet interactions. AFM provides a tool for monitoring interactions and relating them to interfacial structure. 

We previously proposed an interpretation of thermal stabilization of supported catalysts by rare-earth elements [10, 11, 18] by means of interfacial structural coherence between alumina and rare-earth aluminates. This model, developped for lanthanum and neodymium, can be easily extended to cerium since LaAlOs, NdAlOs and CeAlOs are iso-structural mixed oxides with identical lattice parameters (a = 7.6 A). 

Lorenzis, L.D. and Zavarise, G. (2009) Cohesive zone modeling of interfacial stresses in plated beams. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 46, 4181—4191. 

Fig. 17 Schematic structural models of interfacial water molecules on the fused quartz/OTS/solution interface in (a) alkaline, (b) neutral and (c) acidic phosphate buffered solutions. Arrows show the direction of the dipole moment of the interfacial water molecules [147. ...

For a given model of the structure normal to the interface, no matter how complex, it is possible to calculate the neutron reflectivity exactly using the same formulae, apart from the difference in the refractive index, as for light polarized at rightangles to the plane of reflection. For a multilayer structure the optical matrix method [4] can then be used, in which the interface is divided into as many layers as are required to describe it with adequate resolution. This method lends itself especially well to machine calculations and is therefore the most widely used method of analysing neutron reflectivity. However, it does not reveal the relatively simple relation between reflectivity and interfacial structure, which can be done more clearly using the kinematic approximation. In the kinematic approximation the reflectivity profile is given by [5,6]... 

The surface characterization tools that provide qualitative and quantitative information about wettability, morphology, and elemental and molecular surface chemistry are outlined in this section. These tools can provide a comprehensive view of the surface (10-100 A) from which a model of interfacial behavior can be developed. The model of the working surface can be utilized to understand fundamental structure-property relations and thus used in general problem solving. It is important to remember that no one surface tool is an end in itself [28j. It is important to correlate information from all sources to build a working model of behavior. The understanding of the surface structure allows one to apply the appropriate surface modification and to follow the modification as a function of polymer processing. Thus, assessment of the real-world surface chemistry in a deliverable biomedical product is necessary and prudent. 

FARRINGTON Both structural and NMR results indicate that sodium ions occupy non-equivalent sites within the beta alumina conduction-p1ane. It is unclear exactly how this non-equivalency is manifest on the microscopic level whether at unit cells or in larger domains. Similar non-equivalency does not seem to be the case in alumina. I submit that detailed models of interfacial behaviour in g-alumina must take into consideration these structural data presently available despite their ambiguities. Complete site equivalency and ion mobility should not be assumed for g-alumina. 

In conclusion, the study of the overall process of electrochemical formation of polypyrrole must include not only the simple oxidation of monomer and the coupling of the charged species to produce the polymer chains, but also the nature, kinetics and effects on polymer structure and properties of all the parallel electrochemical and chemical processes which accompany it. Models of interfacial reactions, including the different processes taking place at the electrode/ electrolyte interface, must be developed showing the possibilities for the use of electrochemical methods of synthesis to obtain specific polymer films for each technological application. 

Swamy, T., Kumbur, E.C. Mench, M.M. Characterization of interfacial structure in PEFCs Water storage and contact resistance model. J Electrochem. Soc. 157 1 (2010), pp. B77-B85. 

Models of a second type (Sec. IV) restrict themselves to a few very basic ingredients, e.g., the repulsion between oil and water and the orientation of the amphiphiles. They are less versatile than chain models and have to be specified in view of the particular problem one has in mind. On the other hand, they allow an efficient study of structures on intermediate length and time scales, while still establishing a connection with microscopic properties of the materials. Hence, they bridge between the microscopic approaches and the more phenomenological treatments which will be described below. Various microscopic models of this type have been constructed and used to study phase transitions in the bulk of amphiphihc systems, internal phase transitions in monolayers and bilayers, interfacial properties, and dynamical aspects such as the kinetics of phase separation between water and oil in the presence of amphiphiles. 

Lattice models for bulk mixtures have mostly been designed to describe features which are characteristic of systems with low amphiphile content. In particular, models for ternary oil/water/amphiphile systems are challenged to reproduce the reduction of the interfacial tension between water and oil in the presence of amphiphiles, and the existence of a structured disordered phase (a microemulsion) which coexists with an oil-rich and a water-rich phase. We recall that a structured phase is one in which correlation functions show oscillating behavior. Ordered lamellar phases have also been studied, but they are much more influenced by lattice artefacts here than in the case of the chain models. 

Certainly these approaches represent a progress in our understanding of the interfacial properties. All the phenomena taken into account, e.g., the coupling with the metal side, the degree of solvation of ions, etc., play a role in the interfacial structure. However, it appears that the theoretical predictions are very sensitive to the details of the interaction potentials between the various species present at the interface and also to the approximations used in the statistical treatment of the model. In what follows we focus on a small number of basic phenomena which, probably, determine the interfacial properties, and we try to use very transparent approximations to estimate the role of these phenomena. 

In the previous section we saw on an example the main steps of a standard statistical mechanical description of an interface. First, we introduce a Hamiltonian describing the interaction between particles. In principle this Hamiltonian is known from the model introduced at a microscopic level. Then we calculate the free energy and the interfacial structure via some approximations. In principle, this approach requires us to explore the overall phase space which is a manifold of dimension 6N equal to the number of degrees of freedom for the total number of particles, N, in the system. 

In principle, a measurement of upon water adsorption gives the value of the electrode potential in the UHV scale. In practice, the interfacial structure in the UHV configuration may differ from that at an electrode interface. Thus, instead of deriving the components of the electrode potential from UHV experiments to discuss the electrochemical situation, it is possible to proceed the other way round, i.e., to examine the actual UHV situation starting from electrochemical data. The problem is that only relative quantities are measured in electrochemistry, so that a comparison with UHV data requires that independent data for at least one metal be available. Hg is usually chosen as the reference (model) metal for the reasons described earlier. 

---