Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Comparison of the Different Models

Of the models above presented, the ND has found wider acceptance and application because of its good predicting capability, including competence between metal [Pg.470]

Comparison of Literature Proton-Binding Constants and Site Fractions for Different Humic Models  [Pg.471]

Largely based on data collected by Matynia et al. (2010). Fitted values unless otherwise noted. Assumed, not obtained from fitting. [Pg.471]

Observing the average fractions y, and yj of carboxylic and phenolic types, in general, a higher proportion of carboxylic types is found in fitted results (except WHAM and SHM, where they are fixed), which is in agreanent with chemical analysis methods (Senesi and Loffredo 1998). The exception is again the ND model, particularly the results of Milne et al. for HA from this point of view also, questions arise about how realistic is this model. [Pg.472]

NICA isotherm for competitive binding. Diverse electrostatic models are considered, mainly based on one out of two concepts the impermeable sphere model (similar to a mineral particle) or the Dorman phase model, where a certain volume is assumed to be in Donnan equilibrium with the bulk. Considering these contributions, several models are proposed in the end showing similar fitting quality to titration curves because these curves have poor sensitivity to the many adjustable parameters additional, independent data are needed to improve modeling of cation binding to HSs. [Pg.473]


The models developed for steam reformers have been checked against a number of industrial units in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. The comparison of the models with industrial reactors is supplemented with the comparison of the different models for a case which is far from thermodynamic equilibrium. A sample of the results for the two industrial steam reformers (1, II) are presented. [Pg.441]

There are also other types of models and we suggest that interested readers consult a specialist text James and Webber is an excellent start, which also contains detailed sections on implementing models as well as a comparison of the different models themselves. [Pg.39]

The comparison of the different model structures shows that with respect to product quality, the measurements of the controlled process only provide sufficient information to derive static characteristics. [Pg.436]

Comparison of Models Only scattered and inconclusive results have been obtained by calculation of the relative performances of the different models as converiers. Both the RTD and the dispersion coefficient require tracer tests for their accurate determination, so neither method can be said to be easier to apply The exception is when one of the cited correlations of Peclet numbers in terms of other groups can be used, although they are rough. The tanks-in-series model, however, provides a mechanism that is readily visualized and is therefore popular. [Pg.2089]

The fluctuating cage model presented in Chapter 7 is an alternative. The idea came from comparison of the different kinds of absorption spectra of HC1 found in liquid solutions (Fig. 0.5). In SFg as a solvent the rotational structure of the infrared absorption spectrum of HC1 is well resolved [15, 16], while in liquid He it is not resolved but has... [Pg.8]

A comparison of the two models described by equations (9.4.7) and (9.4.8) with fractional crystallization for >j = 0.1 and Dt = 5 and assuming an erupted fraction Y of 50 percent is shown in Figure 9.5 (p. 493). Use of either equation (9.4.7) or equation (9.4.8) leads to quite different patterns of incompatible and compatible elements (Albarede, 1985 Caroff et al., 1993) which makes it possible to discuss the timing of replenishment and eruption events. [Pg.504]

A couple of years ago a workshop was organized to compare the performance of the various statistical methods applied for receptor model (12). To create an objective basis for the comparison of the different analyses, a synthetic data set was generated according to the following equation ... [Pg.277]

Fig. 7.7. Comparison of the different energy behavior of partial dissociation cross sections a(E,j) for the production of NO(j) in indirect, HONO(iS i), and in direct, ClNO(Si), photofragmentation. Note the quite different energy scales The results for HONO are obtained from a two-dimensional model (Schinke, Untch, Suter, and Huber 1991) and the cross sections for C1NO are taken from a three-dimensional wavepacket calculation (Untch, Weide, and Schinke 1991b). Fig. 7.7. Comparison of the different energy behavior of partial dissociation cross sections a(E,j) for the production of NO(j) in indirect, HONO(iS i), and in direct, ClNO(Si), photofragmentation. Note the quite different energy scales The results for HONO are obtained from a two-dimensional model (Schinke, Untch, Suter, and Huber 1991) and the cross sections for C1NO are taken from a three-dimensional wavepacket calculation (Untch, Weide, and Schinke 1991b).
In addition to the rodent bioassay, the aromatic amines have been studied in the shorter term test Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity as well as in a variety of acute toxicity assays. A number of QSARs have been generated from such data. The work of Hansch in recent years has demonstrated that the comparison of the QSAR models obtained in different systems, by putting them in a wider perspective, can provide useful clues in the study of the mechanisms of action of individual chemical classes, and can give precious hints on how appropriate the specific models and parameters selected are (Hansch, 2001 Hansch et al., 2002). An exercise of the mechanistic comparison of QSARs has been performed on aromatic amines (Benigni and Passerini, 2002). The results are detailed below. [Pg.190]

Unfortunately, a detailed comparison of the continuum models is available only at the semiempirical level.54,55 Because the SMx models are specially parametrized to describe free energy of hydration, it is not surprising that they are the best for reproducing this value. A detailed discussion of the advantages and limitations of different types of solvation models with regard to the various types of approximations and different types of organic molecules can be found in references 53-55. [Pg.574]

To a geologist who has not worked with seismic data, this situation is confusing. Even among seismologists, there is disagreement as to what features of the different models are genuine characteristics of the velocity structures beneath shields. For this reason, we thought it would be helpful to discuss what features can and cannot be well resolved by the various seismic methods as well as the seismic data that have been used. However, it was unexpectedly difficult in some cases to make accurate comparisons of the various models because they use different radial... [Pg.45]

The resulting pKB value is 8.09 + 0.145. The data was then refit to the power departure version of the equation to yield the Clark plot shown in panel C. The calculated F for comparison of the simple model (slope = unity) to the more complex model (slope fit independently) yielded a value for F that is not greater than that required for 95% confidence of difference. Therefore, the slope can be considered not significantly different from unity. Finally, the data was again refit to the quadratic departure version of the equation to yield the Clark plot shown in panel D to test for nonlinearity. The resulting F indicates that the plot is not significantly nonlinear. [Pg.116]

Therefore this potential is particularly useful in model studies of the effects of a departure from harmonicity on spectra. As one can show, (181 the envelopes of the vibronic bands resulting from transitions between corresponding to Vi(Q) = VM Q) and v n, n = 0,1,2,..., corresponding to V/(Q) = VM(Q - R) with R- < Q < R+ depend upon two parameters A = wR2/2 and a. The Gram-Charlier envelopes for these transitions have been reported in a previous paper (18). The envelopes obtained using the trial functions 1 are shown in Fig. 1. A comparison of the differences between the exact envelopes and the ones derived from 1 and from is given in Fig. 2. Except for the harmonic oscillator, which is very well described in both cases, the envelopes derived from T are considerably better and the improvement increases with increasing departure from harmonicity. [Pg.166]

A few comparisons between experimental measurements and model predictions are reported to show the reliability of the different models, to investigate the relative reactivity of the different polymers and, finally, to allow a brief discussion of the different numerical approaches. [Pg.147]


See other pages where Comparison of the Different Models is mentioned: [Pg.440]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.1609]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.1609]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.6396]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.113]   


SEARCH



Comparison of different models

Comparison of the Models

Comparisons of models

Different models

Model comparison

© 2024 chempedia.info