Comparison of model and experimental

Fig. 24. Comparison of model and experimental results using an integrated density and step height dependent model [48].

Table 6. Comparison of modeled and experimental level sets.

Comparison of Model and Experimental Results. Modeling a wide variety of different experimental conditions while varying the rate constant for the HO + HOSO2 reaction, demonstrated that the results were not significantly affected by the choice of this rate constant up to a value of 1 x 1010 cnw/s. The experimental results shown in Figure 1 were obtained with NO added to the reaction system for the final IS ms prior to HO detection. Model results for this type of experiment were found to to largely unaffected by the choice of the rate constant for the HOSO2 + NO reaction. 

Figure 3.86 Comparison of model and experimental data of the oxygen flux leaving the reactor in a single-channel TAP fixed-bed reactor [126]...

Fig. 27. Profiles of local heat transfer coefficient along the probe comparison of model and experimental data (Bai et al, 1991).

Figure 10.6 Comparison of modeling and experimental conversions of thermal decomposition of carbon dioxide in a dense zirconia membrane reactor (Itoh et al., 1993]...

Fig. 17. Comparison of model and experimental results. Carbon number effects on olefin and paraffin chain termination probability (experimental/model same as in Fig. 16).

Figure E14-3.1 Comparison of model and experimental exit tracer concentrations.

TABLE VI Comparison of Model and Experimental Estimates of the Time of Initiation of Chromosome Synthesis ... 

Comparison of modeled and experimental data for these three systems gave agreement ranging from approximate to very good. 

Stonesifer R.B., Rybicki E.F., McCabe D.E. Warm prestress modeling Comparison of models and experimental results. Material engineering associates, NUREG/CR-5208, MEA-2305 (1989)... 

Ruijgrok, W., H. Tieben, and P. Eisinga, The dry deposition of particles to a forest canopy A comparison of model and experimental results. Atmospheric Environment, 1997.31(3) 399-415. 

FIGURE 9.24 Comparison of model and experimental bubble shape. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher from Campbell and Cao, 1987.)... 

---