Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Comparison of the Models

A list of the input parameters used in the three electrostatic adsorption models and required by MINTEQA2 is given in Table 10.14. For measurements over a range of ionic strengths, the CC model requires one or more values for Ci (cf. Dzombak and Morel 1987). The DL model is both simpler [Pg.385]

Probably the TL model offers the most accurate description of the sorption process on an atomic scale. However, most published model parameters have been derived assuming that only H+ and OH occupy the zero plane and that all other sorbate species are found in the /0 plane (cf. Smith [Pg.386]

Cations that form strong inner-sphere aqueous complexes are often strongly and specifically adsorbed when the same ligand is involved in solution and at the sorbent surface. Conversely, species forming weak aquocomplexes or ion pairs tend to be weakly adsorbed. These observations have formed the basis for most estimates of intrinsic adsorption constants (cf. Dzombak and Morel 1990 Smith and Jenne 1991). The extensive literature of solution complexation constants (cf. Smith and Martell 1976 Baes and Mesmer 1976, 1981) has facilitated such estimation methods. As an example, log K - values for cation adsorption by specific metal oxyhydroxides plotted against the first hydrolysis constants of the same cations are often strongly correlated. Such plots, called linear free [Pg.387]

TABLE 10.14 Parameters in the constant capacitance CO, diffuse-layer DL), and triple-layer (TL) models, as required inputs to MINTEQA2 [Pg.389]

Note MINTEQA2 suggests C = 1.4 F/m for use in the CC model. Most workers assume C2 = 0.2 F/m in the TL model. KfJ and K are intrinsic constants for strongly adsorbed cations and ligands, respectively. denotes intrinsic constants for electrolyte cations and anions. Intrinsic constants for the adsorption of complexes are also commonly used in the TL model. [Pg.389]


The statistics literature presents numerous reviews of comparing the description of one model against another. Watanabe and Himmel-blau (1984) present a list of review articles. The judgment criterion is based on a comparison of the model predictions against the measurements. These comparisons are related to the general statistic given below, developed tor each model with its corresponding parameter set. [Pg.2578]

From a comparison of the model curves of the variation in log rate versus pH expected for reaction of possible diazonium species with possible amine and phenolic species (Figs. 1 and 2) with those obtained (Table 28) for the reaction of... [Pg.51]

Comparison of the model-derived DIFF with the experimentally evaluated DIFF show that protein routing can be described in terms of the amount of protein synthesized from catabolic activity that is, in general it is around 20% of the mean carbon flux of the diet. A simple explanation why dp > dw is also proposed. [Pg.230]

A comparison of the modelling and empirical approaches are given below. [Pg.4]

Normally (T is used without considering the solvent quality. However, a master low curve can only be established using such a method. In Table 5 a comparison of the model prediction with the experimental findings, obtained by laser light scattering measurements, is given. [Pg.34]

Comparison of the model maps (Figure 1(c) and (d)) again shows qualitative agreement. All regions agree to within one contour level (0.05 e A 3) except for the lone pair regions for 0(2) and 0(3) which are significantly sharpened compared to those obtained with the SC data. [Pg.230]

An approximate analysis of polymer adsorption as a set of sequential reactions leads to a simple equation for the adsorption isotherm expressed in terms of three parameters. Comparison of the model with recently published statistical theories reveals remarkable agreement in both the general shape of the isotherms and the predicted effects of molecular weight. The problems of applying such models to experimental data are discussed. [Pg.23]

Fig. 13. Comparison of the model (K19) with the experimental data for bubble formation in viscous liquids without surface-tension effect. Fig. 13. Comparison of the model (K19) with the experimental data for bubble formation in viscous liquids without surface-tension effect.
Fig. 15. Comparison of the model (S3) with the data collected for bubble formation in inviscid liquids under constant pressure conditions. Fig. 15. Comparison of the model (S3) with the data collected for bubble formation in inviscid liquids under constant pressure conditions.
Fig. 26. Comparison of the model (SI) with the collected data for drop formation in non-Newtonian liquids. Fig. 26. Comparison of the model (SI) with the collected data for drop formation in non-Newtonian liquids.
This chapter provides a description of the solids conveying process and the theoretical models in the literature. The literature models will be presented before the experimental solids conveying data because only recently has experimental data become available for this process section. That is, the early theoretical models were developed without actual solids conveying data. Data will be presented regarding the temperature and forces that are associated with solids conveying of different polymers. Next, a comparison of the models with the experimental data will be provided. Both smooth bore and grooved barrel feed sections will be presented. The field experiences of the authors, however, are dominated by smooth bore extruders. [Pg.131]

Straub J.O. (2005). Concentrations of the UV Filter Ethylhexyl Methyoxycinnamate in the Aquatic Compartment A Comparison of the Modeled Concentrations for Swiss Surface Waters with Empirical Monitoring Data. In D.R. Dietrich, S.E. Webb, and T. Petty (Eds.) Hot Spot Pollutants Pharmaceutical in the Environment. Elsevier, New York, pp. 51-62. [Pg.286]

The sensor output can be used to test the validity of processing models such as the Loos-Springer model [30]. Sensor measured values of t] can be compared with the Loos-Springer model predictions. Figure 4.14 is a comparison of the model s predictions and the measured values at the sixty-fourth ply. Agreement in the viscosity s time dependence and magnitude with the predictions of models is essential if the model is to be verified and used with confidence. [Pg.150]

This basic approach is really divided into several distinct categories. Two of these, Davison s method and Marshall s method, provide suitable modal reduction for the state-space representation of the methanation reactor to a 12th-order model. Comparisons of the models and discussion of additional model reduction are presented in the next section. [Pg.181]

Models have been described in the literature for AP-B [53] and Bunodosoma granulifera toxins II (Bg II) [26]. The AP-B model was derived from the structure of Sh I using energy minimization and the Bg II model from that of BDS I using energy minimization and 10 ps of dynamics. In both cases the calculations appear to have been carried out for the molecule in vacuo without the use of a distance-dependent dielectric, under which conditions the positions of the charged side chains on the surface are likely to be distorted. Visual comparison of the model of AP-B [53] with the experimentally determined solution structure [47] indicates significant differences in side-chain orientations. [Pg.304]

Comparison of the model of direct electron tunneling with alternative models... [Pg.265]

Comparison of the model results with plant data ... [Pg.453]

Below are reported comparisons of the model with some experimental systems. We consider successively the behaviour of a highly conductive polymer like polyaniline in contact with solutions containing redox couples (Fe(CN6)3 /Fe(CN6)4 ) and the oxidation of hydroquinone (HQ) mediated by a moderately conductive polymer (pECBZ) film. [Pg.256]

No figure is presented, but the comparison of the model and the experimental 2+ energies shows a fit to the N, Z dependence of comparable quality to that of the energy ratios. [Pg.67]

Figure 1 shows a comparison of the model results with the experimental results. The three curves shown in the plot correspond to three different values of the rate constant for the HOSO + O2 reaction upper - 8 x 10-13, middle - 4 x IO13, and lower - 2 x 10"13 cm3/s. Similar comparisons between model and experimental results have been made for a wide variety of other experimental conditions. Based upon such comparisons, we have concluded that a rate constant of (4 )x lu-13 cm3/s gives the best match between the experimental and model results, in both an absolute sense and based upon the shape of the O2 titration results. Since there is greater uncertainty in the absolute concentrations of HO radicals than there is in the trend of the HO concentrations with increasing O2, the comparison of the shapes of the experimental and model O2 titration profiles may provide a reliable basis for comparison. [Pg.447]

There is the need of comparison and integration of different QSAR methodologies. The regulatory needs forced the debate on the comparison of the models. New efforts have to be put in this direction because there are many open problems. The components of the QSAR models are still in many cases not fully clarified. [Pg.197]

We have reviewed current conceptual and modeling approaches in mixture eco-toxicology as well as current experimental evidence to derive practical risk assessment protocols for species and species assemblages. From the review of conceptual approaches in mixture ecotoxicology, it appears that there is a difference between a mechanistic view of joint action from a compound mixture and a probabilistic perspective on combined toxicity and mixture risk. A mechanistic view leads to emphasis on the distinction of modes of action and physicochemical properties first, then on the choice of the appropriate joint toxicity model, followed by a comparison of the models prediction with experimental observations. A probabilistic orientation leads to the observation that concentration addition often yields a relatively satisfactory quantitative prediction of observations for the integral level of effects as observed in individual organisms or populations. In these applications, concentration addition is frequently connected with a slight bias to conservatism, especially for compounds with different modes of action (Backhaus et al. 2000,2004 Faust et al. 2003). [Pg.176]

COMPARISON OF THE MODEL WITH EXISTING MODELS AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA... [Pg.18]

E. E. Glickman and V. I. Igoshev, Micromechanism of Solid Metal Induced Embrittlement Comparison of the Model with the Experiment, Surface Physics, Chemistry, Mechanics, No. 128-136 (1989) (in Russian). [Pg.528]

Admittance-vs-frequency measurements made at several temperatures on a polyisobutylene-coated TSM resonator were fit to the equivalent-circuit model of Sections 3.1.3 and 3.1.9 to determine values of G and G for the film [66]. These extracted values are shown in Figure 4.4, along with 5-MHz values obtained from the literature for polyisobutylene having an average molecular weight of 1.56 X 10 [44]. We note excellent agreement between the extracted and literature values of G from —20°C to 60°C, and in G" from —20°C to 10°C. Above 10°C, the extracted G" values are approximately 30% higher than the literature values. These results illustrate how AW devices can be used to quantitatively evaluate the viscoelastic properties of polymer films. Similar models for other AW devices, such as the model for SAW devices coated with viscoelastic layers (Section 3.2.7 and [61]), can enable these other devices also to be used to determine modulus values. However, the pure shear motion of the TSM does simplify the model, and the evaluation of the modulus values as compared with the more complex displacements of other AW devices such as the SAW device (a comparison of the models of Section 3.1.9 for the TSM and Section 3.2.7 for the SAW demonstrates this point). [Pg.163]


See other pages where Comparison of the Models is mentioned: [Pg.352]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.309]   


SEARCH



A comparison of the MO and VB bonding models

Comparison between Simulation and Theory of the Rouse Model

Comparison of the Different Models

Comparison of the LCP and VSEPR Models

Comparison of the Langevin-network model with experiments

Comparison of the Modified Campbell-Dontula Model with Experimental Data

Comparison of the Two Models

Comparison of the Various Models for Adsorption

Comparison of the craze-growth model with experiments

Comparisons of models

Kinetic model of the photoinitiated polymerization and its comparison with experimental data

Model comparison

Predicted results of the composite model and comparison with experiments

The FEBEX benchmark test. Case definition and comparison of different modelling approaches

© 2024 chempedia.info