Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Measurement method comparison data model

To clarify the mechanisms of the clay-reinforced carbonaceous char formation, which may be responsible for the reduced mass loss rates, and hence the lower flammability of the polymer matrices, a number of thermo-physical characteristics of the PE/MMT nanocomposites have been measured in comparison with those of the pristine PE (which, by itself is not a char former) in both inert and oxidizing atmospheres. The evolution of the thermal and thermal-oxidative degradation processes in these systems was followed dynamically with the aid of TGA and FTIR methods. Proper attention was paid also to the effect of oxygen on the thermal-oxidative stability of PE nanocomposites in their solid state, in both the absence as well as in the presence of an antioxidant. Several sets of experimentally acquired TGA data have provided a basis for accomplishing thorough model-based kinetic analyses of thermal and thermal-oxidative degradation of both pristine PE and PE/MMT nanocomposites prepared in this work. [Pg.2]

A comparison of the two-compartment first-order absorption model fit to measured plasma concentration data from a traditional method of residuals analysis and a nonlinear regression analysis is provided in Figure 10.99. This figure illustrates the fact that both methods offer a very reasonable fit to the measured data. It also demonstrates that there is not a large difference between the fit provided by the two different techniques. Close examination does reveal, however, that the nonlinear regression analysis does provide a more universal fit to all the data points. This is likely due to the fact that nonlinear regression fits all the points simultaneously, whereas the method of residuals analysis fits the data in a piecewise manner with different data points used for different regions of the curve. [Pg.271]

These classification methods use different principles and rules for learning and prediction of class membership, but wiU usually produce a comparable result. Some comparisons of the methods have been given (i.e., Kotsiantis, 2007 Rani et al., 2006). Although the modem methods such as SVM have demonstrated very good performance, the drawback is that the model becomes an incomprehensible black-box that removes the explanatory information provided by, for example, a logistic regression model. However, classification performance usually outweighs the need for a comprehensible model. PCA has been used for classification based on bioimpedance measurements. Technically, PCA is not a method for classification but rather a method of data reduction, more suitable as a parameterization step before the classification analysis. [Pg.386]

In many cases, the methods used to solve identification problems are based on an iterative minimization of some performance criterion measuring the dissimilarity between the experimental and the synthetic data (generated by the current estimate of the direct model). In our case, direct quantitative comparison of two Bscan images at the pixels level is a very difficult task and involves the solution of a very difficult optimization problem, which can be also ill-behaved. Moreover, it would lead to a tremendous amount of computational burden. Segmented Bscan images may be used as concentrated representations of the useful... [Pg.172]

This paper is structured as follows in section 2, we recall the statement of the forward problem. We remind the numerical model which relates the contrast function with the observed data. Then, we compare the measurements performed with the experimental probe with predictive data which come from the model. This comparison is used, firstly, to validate the forward problem. In section 4, the solution of the associated inverse problem is described through a Bayesian approach. We derive, in particular, an appropriate criteria which must be optimized in order to reconstruct simulated flaws. Some results of flaw reconstructions from simulated data are presented. These results confirm the capability of the inversion method. The section 5 ends with giving some tasks we have already thought of. [Pg.327]

Computer codes are used for the calculational procedures which provide highly detailed data, eg, the Ruby code (70). Rapid, short-form methods yielding very good first approximations, such as the Kamlet equations, are also available (71—74). Both modeling approaches show good agreement with experimental data obtained ia measures of performance. A comparison of calculated and experimental explosive detonation velocities is shown ia Table 5. [Pg.9]

The comparison with experiment can be made at several levels. The first, and most common, is in the comparison of derived quantities that are not directly measurable, for example, a set of average crystal coordinates or a diffusion constant. A comparison at this level is convenient in that the quantities involved describe directly the structure and dynamics of the system. However, the obtainment of these quantities, from experiment and/or simulation, may require approximation and model-dependent data analysis. For example, to obtain experimentally a set of average crystallographic coordinates, a physical model to interpret an electron density map must be imposed. To avoid these problems the comparison can be made at the level of the measured quantities themselves, such as diffraction intensities or dynamic structure factors. A comparison at this level still involves some approximation. For example, background corrections have to made in the experimental data reduction. However, fewer approximations are necessary for the structure and dynamics of the sample itself, and comparison with experiment is normally more direct. This approach requires a little more work on the part of the computer simulation team, because methods for calculating experimental intensities from simulation configurations must be developed. The comparisons made here are of experimentally measurable quantities. [Pg.238]

In this paper, we discuss studies based on comparison with background measurements that may have a skew distribution. We discuss below the design of such a study. The design is intended to insure that the model for the comparison is valid and that the amount of skewness is minimized. Subsequently, we present a statistical method for the comparison of the background measurements with the largest of the measurements from the suspected region. This method, which is based on the use of power transformations to achieve normality, is original in that it takes into account estimation of the transformation from the data. [Pg.120]

System NH -S02 H20 For comparison with calculated data only the experimental results of Johnstone (16) and Boublik et al. (JT 1 ) were used. (Boublik et al. investigated the system NH3-SO2-SO3-H2O only some of their results with very low SO3/SO2 ratios were used for comparison with calculated data). Experimental results by other authors mostly cover very high solute concentrations in the liquid phase (20 molal and more) and are, therefore, not suitable for comparison with the models discussed here. As van Krevelen s method cannot be used for this system, the comparison is limited to the other procedures. Partial pressures of ammonia calculated from the BR-model are generally too large the calculated values exceed the experimental results mostly by a factor larger than 5. The EMNP method generally yields partial pressures which are only about half as large as the measured ones. The calculated partial pressures of SO2 are always too small, for temperatures between 50 and 90 °C the mean deviations a-mount from 20 to 40 per cent for the EMNP-model and from 40 to 70 per cent for the BR-model. [Pg.159]

In. my opinion, the study o-f monolayer -formation has less practical importance than the study o-f micelles. Yet, the thermodynamics of monolayer formation has seen substantial study. I think that this is largely due to the fact that the monomer—monolayer equilibrium can be unambiguously and relatively easily measured using the Hutchinson method (25), as exploited by Rosen and Hua ( ), while this cannot be said for monomer—micelle equilibrium. Therefore, mixed monolayer formation will be a more fruitful field for model development in the near future than mixed micelles because of the availability of a method of obtaining experimental data for comparison. [Pg.330]

Correlation times and activation energy parameters obtained from different techniques may or may not agree with one another. Comparison of these data enables one to check the applicability of the model employed and examine whether any particular basic molecular process is reflected by the measurement or whether the method of analysis employed is correct. In order to characterize rotational motion in plastic crystals properly it may indeed be necessary to compare correlation times obtained by several methods. Thus, values from NMR spectroscopy and Rayleigh scattering enable us to distinguish uncorrelated and correlated rotations. Molecular disorder is not reflected in NMR measurements to this end, diffraction studies would be essential. [Pg.210]


See other pages where Measurement method comparison data model is mentioned: [Pg.296]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.146]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.371 ]




SEARCH



Comparison Data Model

Data Method

Data comparison

Data modeling

Measurement data

Model comparison

Modeling methods

Modelling methods

© 2024 chempedia.info