Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dispersion comparison with other models

Vitanov and Popov et al.156 660-662 have studied Cd(0001) electrolyti-cally grown in a Teflon capillary in an aqueous surface-inactive electrolyte solution. The E is independent of ce) and v. The capacity dispersion is less than 5%, and the electrode resistance dispersion is less than 3%. The adsorption of halides increases in the order Cl" < Br" < I".661 A comparison with other electrodes shows an increase in adsorption in the sequence Cd(0001) < pc-Cd < Ag( 100) < Ag(l 11). A linear Parsons-Zobel plot with /pz = 1.09 has been found at a = 0. A slight dependence has been found for the Cit a curves on ce, ( 5%) in the entire region of a. Theoretical C, E curves have been calculated according to the GCSG model. [Pg.108]

The models of flow dispersion are based on the plug flow model. However, in comparison with the PF model, the dispersion flow model considers various perturbation modes of the piston distribution in the flow velocity. If the forward and backward perturbations present random components with respect to the global flow direction, then we have the case of an axial dispersion flow (ADF). In addition, the axial and radial dispersion flow is introduced when the axial flow perturbations are coupled with other perturbations that induce the random fluid movement in the normal direction with respect to the global flow. [Pg.83]

Steric repulsion is a short-range interaction that is a result of strong interactions between solvent and material adsorbed at the droplet interface. The adsorbed species favor interaction with the solvent rather than lateral interaction with other adsorbed species [50]. Mackor and van der Waals modeled the adsorption of molecules on to a pair of adsorbing planes, and based on comparisons with experimental data, concluded that steric stabilization must be responsible for the stabilization of some dispersion systems [51,52]. This phenomenon is common with emulsion droplets stabilized by nonionic polymers. [Pg.143]

Until now, most evaluation studies and model intercomparisons relied on comparison of the outputs of models with observations or other model results. However, there is a limited amount of observations of sufficient quality compared to the complexity of the phenomena, not to mention the inherent variability of atmospheric dispersion, which makes it difficult to measure. Therefore, such validation studies alone do not provide sufficient proof of a model s quality and its capabilities to address problems outside the range of the validation data sets. A scientific assessment of the model is an important means to obtain information about the capabilities, reliability, and quality of a model. The scientific assessment seeks ... [Pg.425]

The fully quantum mechanical model is not yet available because of the lack of dispersion, which is currently under development [23]. Nevertheless, the results obtained so far are encouraging. In particular CMs offer from this point of view a significant advantage the same molecular system is investigated in three very different environments, namely gas phase, interface and bulk solution, with the very same method. We remark that no other method has at present the same capability when comparisons among the three environments are drawn, the use of different models thus introduces a dishomogeneity in the results obtained whose impact is not easy to evaluate [32]. [Pg.304]

During the two decades of intense interest in the 1,2-intrastrand d(G pG ) crosslink, the only anti,anti conformation proposed was HH, and only this conformation was expected, before we studied (R,S,S,R)-BipPt(d(GpG)). Remarkably, we found two N(7)-Pt-N(7) crosslink products one was an HH1 conformer, but the other was a new HH conformer (HH2) (Fig. 7). Each product had a pair of H(8) signals with a dispersion (Fig. 8) and a medium H(8)-H(8) NOESY cross-peak, features consistent with HH conformers [38] [63] [67] [68]. The very similar H(8)-H(8) distance, estimated for both in the medium-distance (2.5-3.5 A) range, is consistent with HH bases. For comparison, H(8)-H(8) distances in HT models are 4.5-5.5 A. No H(8)-H(l ) cross-peaks were observed in the 300 ms mixingtime NOESY spectrum, indicating that all of the G s are anti since an intense H(8)-H(l ) cross-peak would be observed for a syn-G. ... [Pg.259]


See other pages where Dispersion comparison with other models is mentioned: [Pg.30]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.1067]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.816]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.1153]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.1132]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.2565]    [Pg.2567]    [Pg.368]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.539 , Pg.540 , Pg.541 , Pg.542 , Pg.543 , Pg.591 , Pg.600 , Pg.601 ]




SEARCH



Dispersion model

Dispersion modeling

Model comparison

© 2024 chempedia.info