Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Micromechanical response

The shock-induced micromechanical response of <100>-loaded single crystal copper is investigated [18] for values of (WohL) from 0 to 10. The latter value results in W 10 Wg at y = 0.01. No distinction is made between total and mobile dislocation densities. These calculations show that rapid dislocation multiplication behind the elastic shock front results in a decrease in longitudinal stress, which is communicated to the shock front by nonlinear elastic effects [pc,/po > V, (7.20)]. While this is an important result, later recovery experiments by Vorthman and Duvall [19] show that shock compression does not result in a significant increase in residual dislocation density in LiF. Hence, the micromechanical interpretation of precursor decay provided by Herrmann et al. [18] remains unresolved with existing recovery experiments. [Pg.226]

By far, the most thoroughly studied material regarding the relationship of micromechanical behavior to macroscale response is LiF [23]-[35]. These data, taken as a whole, remain an important resource from which we are able to develop further understanding of dynamic micromechanical response to shock compression. [Pg.226]

The underlying micromechanisms responsible for the enhancement in toughness are discussed later in Sect. 3.5. [Pg.52]

The forth direction, analytical modeling for understanding the behaviors of these materials, has been popular approach. Testing and characterization have been conducted for developing the models. Such attempts have been done especially for ionic polymer metal composites (IPMCs)[58, 70, 72, 120]. Nemab Nasser and his co-workers carried out extensive experimental studies on both Nafion- and Flemion-based IPMCs consisting of a thin perfluorinated ionomer in various cation forms, seeking to imderstand the fundamental properties of these composites, to explore the mechanism of their actuation, and finally, to optimize their performance for various potential applications[121]. They also performed a systematic experimental evaluation of the mechanical response of both metal-plated and bare Nafion and Flemion in various cation forms and various water saturation levels. They attempted to identify potential micromechanisms responsible for the observed electromechanical behavior of these materials, model them, and compare the model results with experimental data[122]. A computational micromechanics model has been developed to model the initial fast electromechanical response in these ionomeric materials[123]. A number... [Pg.10]

Janssen D et al. (2008) Micro-mechanical modeling of the cement-bone interface The effect of friction, morphology and material properties on the micromechanical response. Journal of Biomechanics 41 3158-3163... [Pg.777]

As with any constitutive theory, the particular forms of the constitutive functions must be constructed, and their parameters (material properties) must be evaluated for the particular materials whose response is to be predicted. In principle, they are to be evaluated from experimental data. Even when experimental data are available, it is often difficult to determine the functional forms of the constitutive functions, because data may be sparse or unavailable in important portions of the parameter space of interest. Micromechanical models of material deformation may be helpful in suggesting functional forms. Internal state variables are particularly useful in this regard, since they may often be connected directly to averages of micromechanical quantities. Often, forms of the constitutive functions are chosen for their mathematical or computational simplicity. When deformations are large, extrapolation of functions borrowed from small deformation theories can produce surprising and sometimes unfortunate results, due to the strong nonlinearities inherent in the kinematics of large deformations. The construction of adequate constitutive functions and their evaluation for particular... [Pg.120]

In summary, it is clear that the micromechanical shock response of single crystal LiF is extremely complex. These results certainly temper the initial enthusiasm associated with Taylor s [9] study of Armco iron as a eomplete explanation for the relationship between the microscale and the macroscale in shock-loaded solids. [Pg.230]

The evolution of T, is just an exercise in mesoscale thermodynamics [13]. These expressions, in combination with (7.54), incorporate concepts of heterogeneous deformation into a eonsistent mierostruetural model. Aspects of local material response under extremely rapid heating and cooling rates are still open to question. An important contribution to the micromechanical basis for heterogeneous deformation would certainly be to establish appropriate laws of flow-stress evolution due to rapid thermal cycling that would provide a physical basis for (7.54). [Pg.243]

Another chapter deals with the physical mechanisms of deformation on a microscopic scale and the development of micromechanical theories to describe the continuum response of shocked materials. These methods have been an important part of the theoretical tools of shock compression for the past 25 years. Although it is extremely difficult to correlate atomistic behaviors to continuum response, considerable progress has been made in this area. The chapter on micromechanical deformation lays out the basic approaches of micromechanical theories and provides examples for several important problems. [Pg.357]

Nevertheless, as response data have accumulated and the nature of the porous deformation problems has crystallized, it has become apparent that the study of such solids has forced overt attention to issues such as lack of thermodynamic equilibrium, heterogeneous deformation, anisotrophic deformation, and inhomogeneous composition—all processes that are present in micromechanical effects in solid density samples but are submerged due to continuum approaches to mechanical deformation models. [Pg.50]

In particular it can be shown that the dynamic flocculation model of stress softening and hysteresis fulfils a plausibility criterion, important, e.g., for finite element (FE) apphcations. Accordingly, any deformation mode can be predicted based solely on uniaxial stress-strain measurements, which can be carried out relatively easily. From the simulations of stress-strain cycles at medium and large strain it can be concluded that the model of cluster breakdown and reaggregation for prestrained samples represents a fundamental micromechanical basis for the description of nonlinear viscoelasticity of filler-reinforced rubbers. Thereby, the mechanisms of energy storage and dissipation are traced back to the elastic response of tender but fragile filler clusters [24]. [Pg.621]

The experimental determination of RBA, however, is difficult but some attempts have been made and these include direct observation, measurements of electrical conductivity, shrinkage energy, gas adsorption and light scattering. The linear elastic response of paper has been explained in terms of various micromechanical models which take into account both fibre and network properties, including RBA. An example of one which predicts the sheet modulus, Es is given below ... [Pg.65]

Micromechanics theories for closed cell foams are less well advanced for than those for open cell foams. The elastic moduli of the closed-cell Kelvin foam were obtained by Finite Element Analysis (FEA) by Kraynik and co-workers (a. 14), and the high strain compressive response predicted by Mills and Zhu (a. 15). The Young s moduli predicted by the Kraynik model, which assumes the cell faces remain flat, lie above the experimental data (Figure 7), while those predicted by the Mills and Zhu model, which assumes that inplane compressive stresses will buckle faces, lie beneath the data. The experimental data is closer to the Mills and Zhu model at low densities, but closer to the Kraynik theory at high foam densities. [Pg.12]

Three-dimensional (3D) structuring of materials allows miniaturization of photonic devices, micro-(nano-)electromechanical systems (MEMS and NEMS), micro-total analysis systems (yu,-TAS), and other systems functioning on the micro- and nanoscale. Miniature photonic structures enable practical implementation of near-held manipulation, plasmonics, and photonic band-gap (PEG) materials, also known as photonic crystals (PhC) [1,2]. In micromechanics, fast response times are possible due to the small dimensions of moving parts. Femtoliter-level sensitivity of /x-TAS devices has been achieved due to minute volumes and cross-sections of channels and reaction chambers, in combination with high resolution and sensitivity of optical con-focal microscopy. Progress in all these areas relies on the 3D structuring of bulk and thin-fllm dielectrics, metals, and organic photosensitive materials. [Pg.159]

When these cerebral endothelial cells are grown to confluence on quartz resonators under identical conditions as applied in the SFM studies, we observed an increase of the load impedance A Zi from 380 23 without HC to 890 27Q when the cells were treated with 550 nM hydrocortisone. Accordingly, the load impedance more than doubles in response to HC. Thus, QCM readings provide a similar answer to SFM with respect to the micromechanical changes that are induced in the cells by incubation with the hormone hydrocortisone. The QCM approach is obviously sensitive enough to monitor even physiological alterations within the cytoskeleton, which paves the way for many applications as a transducer for micromechanical changes in adherent cells. [Pg.331]

The DNF model incorporates the experimentally observed characteristics by using a micromechanism-inspired approach in which the material behavior is decomposed into a viscoplastic response, corresponding to irreversible molecular chain sliding due to the lack of chemical crosslinks in the material, and atime-dependent viscoelastic response. The viscoelastic response is further decomposed into the response of two molecular networks acting in parallel the first network (A) captures the equilibrium response and the second network (B) the time-dependent deviation from the viscoelastic equilibrium state. A onedimensional rheological representation of the model framework and a schematic illustrating the kinematics of deformation are shown in Fig. 11.6. [Pg.364]

Pellejero I, Agustt J, Urbiztondo MA, Ses J, Pina MP, Santamarta J, Abadal G. Nanoporous silicalite-only cantilevers as micromechanical sensors Fabrication, resonance response and VOCs sensing performance. Sens Actuators B 2012 171-712 822-831. [Pg.354]


See other pages where Micromechanical response is mentioned: [Pg.420]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.287]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.229 ]




SEARCH



MICROMECHANICAL

Micromechanics

Micromechanism

© 2024 chempedia.info