Response data

Dose—response relationships are useful for many purposes in particular, the following if a positive dose—response relationship exists, then this is good evidence that exposure to the material under test is causally related to the response the quantitative information obtained gives an indication of the spread of sensitivity of the population at risk, and hence influences ha2ard evaluation the data may allow assessments of no effects and minimum effects doses, and hence may be valuable in assessing ha2ard and by appropriate considerations of the dose—response data, it is possible to make quantitative comparisons and contrasts between materials or between species. 

A distinc tion is to be drawn between situations in which (1) the flow pattern is known in detail, and (2) only the residence time distribution is known or can be calculated from tracer response data. Different networks of reactor elements can have similar RTDs, but fixing the network also fixes the RTD. Accordingly, reaction conversions in a known network will be unique for any form of rate equation, whereas conversions figured when only the RTD is known proceed uniquely only for hnear kinetics, although they can be bracketed in the general case. 

Diseased groups No extrapolations Susceptible groups Long-term, low-level effects Many covariates Minimal dose-response data Association vs. causation... 

Toxicology Animals Maximal dose-response data Realistic models of human disease ... 

An important difference between analysis of stability in the. v-plane and stability in the frequency domain is that, in the former, system models in the form of transfer functions need to be known. In the latter, however, either models or a set of input-output measured open-loop frequency response data from an unknown system may be employed. 

Table 6.5 Open-loop frequency response data...

The justification for the use of the lognormal is the modified Central Limit Theorem (Section 2.5.2.5). However, if the lognormal distribution is used for estimating the very low failure frequencies associated with the tails of the distribution, this approach is conservative because the low-frequency tails of the lognormal distribution generally extend farther from the median than the actual structural resistance or response data can extend. 

The defect question delineates solid behavior from liquid behavior. In liquid deformation, there is no fundamental need for an unusual deformation mechanism to explain the observed shock deformation. There may be superficial, macroscopic similarities between the shock deformation of solids and fluids, but the fundamental deformation questions differ in the two cases. Fluids may, in fact, be subjected to intense transient viscous shear stresses that can cause mechanically induced defects, but first-order behaviors do not require defects to provide a fundamental basis for interpretation of mechanical response data. 

Nevertheless, as response data have accumulated and the nature of the porous deformation problems has crystallized, it has become apparent that the study of such solids has forced overt attention to issues such as lack of thermodynamic equilibrium, heterogeneous deformation, anisotrophic deformation, and inhomogeneous composition—all processes that are present in micromechanical effects in solid density samples but are submerged due to continuum approaches to mechanical deformation models. 

The LER data base served as the primary source of DG failure data, while a data base for DG successes was formed from nuclear plant licensees responses to a USNRC questionnaire (Generic Letter 84-15). Estimates of DG failure on demand were calculated from the LER data, DG test data, and response data from the questionnaire. The questionnaire also provided data on DG performance during complete and partial LOSP and in response to safety injection actuation signals. Trends in DG performance are profiled. The effects of testing schedules on diesel reliability are assessed. Individual failures are identified in an appendix. 

We have next to consider the measurement of the relaxation times. Each t is the reciprocal of an apparent first-order rate constant, so the problem is identical with problems considered in Chapters 2 and 3. If the system possesses a single relaxation time, a semilogarithmic first-order plot suffices to estimate t. The analytical response is often solution absorbance, or an electrical signal proportional to absorbance or to another physical property. As shown in Section 2.3 (Treatment of Instrument Response Data), the appropriate plotting function is In (A, - Aa=), where A, is the... 

Toxicity and cancer dose-response data for tire constituents of the gasoline Estimated additional cancer risk for dwelling s occupants when exposure data me combined with cancer dose-response data... 

There are statistical procedures available to determine whether the data can be fit to a model of dose-response curves that are parallel with respect to slope and all share a common maximal response (see Chapter 11). In general, dose-response data can be fit to a three-parameter logistic equation of the form... 

FIGURE 6.15 Example of application of method of Lew and Angus [10]. (a) Dose-response data, (b) Clark plot according to Equation 6.27 shown, (c) Data refit to power departure version of Equation 6.27 to detect slopes different from unity (Equation 6.28). (d) Data refit to quadratic departure version of Equation 6.27 to detect deviation from linearity (Equation 6.29). 

FIGURE 11.18 Asymmetrical dose-response curves, (a) Dose-response data fit to a symmetrical Hill equation with n = 0.65 and EC50 = 2.2 (solid line) or n= 1, EC50 = 2 (dotted line). It can be seen that neither symmetrical curve fits the data adequately, (b) Data fit to the Gompertz function with m = 0.55 and EC50= 1.9. 

Dose-response data are obtained and plotted on a semi-logarithmic axis, as shown in Figure 12.3a (data shown in Table 12.3a). 

The procedure calculates the concentrations from both curves that produce the same level of response. Where possible, one of the concentrations will be defined by real data and not the fit curve (see Figure 12.3b). The fitting parameters for both curves are shown in Table 12.3b. Some alternative fitting equations for dose-response data are shown in Figure 12.4. 

Some indication of risk of employee exposure to airborne chemicals can be gauged from an analysis of the level of exposure for comparison with known human dose/ response data such as those for carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulphide listed in... 

Ensure that the biological response data are appropriate for modeling. 

---