Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Methyl sediment

The sedimentation and diffusion coefficients for three different preparations of poly(methyl methacrylate) were measuredf in /i-butyl chloride at 35.6 C (= 0) and in acetone at 20 C (> 0) and the following results were obtained ... [Pg.656]

Paprika oleoresin (EEC No. E 160c) is the combination of davor and color principles obtained by extracting paprika with any one or a combination of approved solvents acetone, ethyl alcohol, ethylene dichloride, hexane, isopropyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, methylene chloride, and trichloroethylene. Depending on their source, paprika oleoresins are brown—red, slightly viscous, homogeneous Hquids, pourable at room temperature, and containing 2—5% sediment. [Pg.451]

After the said 2 to 3 hours the liquid is cooled and the bottom sediment, which has a greenish color, is filtered off. The liquid sucked off eventually is treated with active carbon, filtered and made slightly acid by means of acetic acid, at which 2-amino-benzolsulfon-amido-5-methyl-1,3,4-thiodiazol (melting point 204° to 206°C) is precipitated. [Pg.1414]

The carbohydrate has sites for ionic interaction (clusters of sialic acid or sulphate residues) and also hydrophobic interaction (clusters of hydrophobic methyl groups offered by fucose residues). Sedimentation velocity has been a valuable tool in the selection of appropriate mucoadhesives and in the characterisation of the complexes [ 138-143]. [Pg.244]

Methyl parathion has been released to the environment mainly as a result of its use as an insecticide on crops. It is applied to agricultural crops by aerial or ground spraying equipment. Methyl parathion has been detected in surface waters and sediments, rainwater, aquatic organisms, and food. There are no known natural sources of the compound. Methyl parathion has been identified in at least 16 of the 1,585 hazardous waste sites on the NPL (HazDat 2001). [Pg.147]

In soil and sediments, methyl parathion adsorbs to soil and is expected to display moderate mobility (EPA 1980c). The major degradation process of methyl parathion in soil is biodegradation by microbes (Badway and El-Dib 1984). Degradation by hydrolysis has been observed to occur at higher temperatures... [Pg.150]

In random samples of soil taken from five Alabama counties, only 3 of 46 soil samples contained methyl parathion. The concentration in these samples was <0.1 ppm (Albright et al. 1974). Aspartofthe National Soils Monitoring Program, soil and crop samples from 37 states were analyzed for methyl parathion during 1972. Methyl parathion was detected in only 1 soil sample, at a concentration of <0.1 ppm and taken from South Dakota, out of 1,246 total samples taken from the 37 states (Carey et al. 1979). In soil and sediment samples collected from a watershed area in Mississippi, methyl parathion was not detected in the soil samples. In three wetland sediment cores, however, measurable concentrations of methyl parathion were detected during application season (Cooper 1991). [Pg.159]

A uses study analyzed bed sediment samples from major rivers of the United States twice yearly in the period of 1975-1985. Methyl parathion was not detected in any sediment sample (Gilliom et al. 1985). [Pg.159]

Marine sediments, adjacent to a pesticide manufacturing plant in Denmark, contained methyl parathion levels of 40.6 and 44.1 pg/kg dry weight at depths of 0-3 and 4-8 cm, respectively (Kjolholt 1985). [Pg.160]

Analysis of methyl parathion in sediments, soils, foods, and plant and animal tissues poses problems with extraction from the sample matrix, cleanup of samples, and selective detection. Sediments and soils have been analyzed primarily by GC/ECD or GC/FPD. Food, plant, and animal tissues have been analyzed primarily by GC/thermionic detector or GC/FPD, the recommended methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Various extraction and cleanup methods (AOAC 1984 Belisle and Swineford 1988 Capriel et al. 1986 Kadoum 1968) and separation and detection techniques (Alak and Vo-Dinh 1987 Betowski and Jones 1988 Clark et al. 1985 Gillespie and Walters 1986 Koen and Huber 1970 Stan 1989 Stan and Mrowetz 1983 Udaya and Nanda 1981) have been used in an attempt to simplify sample preparation and improve sensitivity, reliability, and selectivity. A detection limit in the low-ppb range and recoveries of 100% were achieved in soil and plant and animal tissue by Kadoum (1968). GC/ECD analysis following extraction, cleanup, and partitioning with a hexane-acetonitrile system was used. [Pg.181]

Using established extraction and cleanup methods, followed by GC/FPD and GC/thermionic detection, Carey et al. (1979) obtained detection limits in the ppb range and recoveries of 80-110% in soil and 70-100% in plant tissue. Good sensitivity and recovery were maintained in a simplified extraction procedure of sediments followed by GC/FPD analysis (Belisle and Swineford 1988). Bound methyl parathion residues that were not extracted with the usual methods were extracted using supercritical methanol by Capriel et al. (1986). They were able to remove 38% of the methyl parathion residues bound to soil, but 34% remained unextractable, and 28% could not be accounted for. [Pg.182]

Pritchard PH, Gripe CR, Walker WW, et al. 1987. Biotic and abiotic dehydration rates of methyl parathion in freshwater and estuarine water and sediment samples. Chemosphere 16 1509-1520. [Pg.227]

Reddy KS, Gambrell RP. 1987. Factors affecting the adsorption of 2,4-D and methyl parathion in soils and sediments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 18 231-241. [Pg.227]

Wolfe NL, Kitchens BE, Macalady DL, et al. 1986. Physical and chemical factors that influence the anaerobic degradation of methyl parathion in sediment systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 5 1019-26. [Pg.238]

Thus, both elemental mercury and the mineral form cinnabar (HgS) can release Hg++, the mercuric ion. Bacteria can then methylate it to form sequentially CH3 Hg+, the methyl mercuric cation, and dimethyl mercury. The latter, like elemental mercury, is volatile and tends to pass into the atmosphere when formed. The methylation of mercury can be accomplished in the environment by bacteria, notably in sediments. [Pg.164]

Methyl arsenic, like methyl mercury, is generated from inorganic forms of the element by methylation reactions in soils and sediments. However, the mechanism is evidently different from that for mercury, depending on the attack by a methyl car-bonium ion rather than a methyl carbanion (Craig 1986, Crosby 1998). Methylation... [Pg.178]

Table XXIX.—Molecular Weights of Poly-(Methyl Methacrylate) Fractions from Sedimentation and Diffusion Measurements ... Table XXIX.—Molecular Weights of Poly-(Methyl Methacrylate) Fractions from Sedimentation and Diffusion Measurements ...
Thus the quantity on the left evaluated for a series of polymer fractions differing only in chain length should be independent of M. Results shown in Table XLII for fractions of poly-(methyl methacry-late) and of polyisobutylene covering unusually wide ranges confirm this prediction within experimental error. It is borne out also by less extensive results of sedimentation measurements on several other systems. Introduction of the values of v, p, and rjo enables... [Pg.627]

Sulfides and disulfides can be produced by bacterial reactions in the marine environment. 2-Dimeth-ylthiopropionic acid is produced by algae and by the marsh grass Spartina alternifolia, and may then be metabolized in sediment slurries under anoxic conditions to dimethyl sulfide (Kiene and Taylor 1988), and by aerobic bacteria to methyl sulfide (Taylor and Gilchrist 1991). Further details are given in Chapter 11, Part 2. Methyl sulfide can also be produced by biological methylation of sulfide itself (HS ). Carbon radicals are not the initial atmospheric products from organic sulfides and disulfides, and the reactions also provide an example in which the rates of reaction with nitrate... [Pg.21]

Fleming EJ, EE Mack, PG Green, DC Nelson (2006) Mercury methylation from unexpected sources molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an iron-reducing bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 72 457-464. [Pg.177]

King JK, JE Kostka, ME Frischer, FM Saunders (2000) Sulfate-reducing bacteria methylate mercury at variable rates in pure culture and in marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 66 2430-2437. [Pg.178]

Pak K-R, R Bartha (1998) Mercury methylation and demethylation in anoxic lake sediments by strictly anaerobic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 64 1013-1017. [Pg.594]

Criterion Importance of criterion HgT in sediment (top 1-2 cm) MeHg in sediment (top 1-2 cm) Percent MeHg in sediment Instantaneous methylation rate Sedimentary accumulation rate of Hg HgT in surface water MeHg in surface water... [Pg.54]


See other pages where Methyl sediment is mentioned: [Pg.532]    [Pg.1226]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.57]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.958 ]




SEARCH



Sediments arsenic methylation

Sediments mercury methylation

© 2024 chempedia.info