Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Membranes removal

The selectivity of pervaporation membranes varies considerably and has a critical effect on the overall separation obtained. The range of results that can be obtained for the same solutions and different membranes is illustrated in Figure 41 for the separation of acetone from water using two types of membrane (89). The figure shows the concentration of acetone in the permeate as a function of the concentration in the feed. The two membranes shown have dramatically different properties. The siUcone mbber membrane removes acetone selectively, whereas the cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) membrane removes water selectively. This difference occurs because siUcone mbber is hydrophobic and mbbery, thus permeates the acetone preferentially. PVA, on the other hand, is hydrophilic and glassy, thus permeates the small hydrophilic water molecules preferentially. [Pg.86]

As indicated earlier, heavy contamination can be buried, sealed or removed. Burying of the material should be well below the root growth zone, and this is normally taken as 3.0 m below the final ground-surface level. Sealing for heavy contamination to prevent vertical or lateral leaching through groundwater flow can be with compacted clay or proprietary plastic membranes. Removal from site of the contaminants is normally only contemplated in a landscaped scheme where the material, even at depth, could be a hazard to public health directly or phytotoxic to plant life. [Pg.29]

Chemical messengers, or neurotransmitters, are normally released when an action potential reaches the synaptic terminals. This process is entirely Ca2+-dependent. Intracellular Ca2+ causes movement of neurotransmitter-containing synaptic vesicles toward the membrane. Removal of Ca2+ will prevent this process, preventing neurotransmitter release even if an action potential arrives. [Pg.46]

Calpains are enzymes that consist of a proteolytic subunit and a calcium binding subunit. In the cytosol, these enzymes are inactive due to binding of the inhibitory protein, calpastatin. Attachment to the cell membrane removes this inhibition and activation occurs at low concentrations of Csi ions. The enzymes hydrolyse proteins as far as peptides complete hydrolysis requires peptidases, which are also present in the cytosol. [Pg.155]

If the electrode response is sluggish, first check/replace the membrane since most 02 electrode problems are due to dirty or leaky membranes. Remove the cell plug and rinse the cell thoroughly with distilled water using a plastic disposable pipet to avoid the risk of damage to the membrane. [Pg.391]

Separation of products from the reaction mixture In situ product removal from enzymatic reactor via a nanofiltration or ultrafiltration membrane Removal of selected enantiomer via a liquid membrane Removal of water in esterification reactions via a pervaporation membrane... [Pg.278]

Step III. If the identity of the fibers remains doubtful after phase contrast and polarized light study on the membrane, remove fibers from the membrane and examine by dispersion staining. All of the optical tests described herein can be performed while the fibers are on the membrane except fiber rolling, dispersion staining, and determination of n. [Pg.32]

Cysteine residues in transferrin were reduced and alkylated in a similar manner as that done for solution samples p). Modiflcation for samples prepared with ProSorb cartridge can be performed in the same ProSorb cartridge before membrane removal, while modifications were performed in an Eppendorf tube for the electroblotted samples. The membranes were incubated 15 minutes at room temperature in a 0.25 M Tris/HQ and 6 M Guanidine hydrochloride buffer containing 1 ml of mercaptoethanol and followed by the addition of 1 ml of 4-vinyl pyridine for another 15 minutes. The membnmes were washed thoroughly with 0.1% TFA afterwards. [Pg.92]

In brain research, microdialysis sampling employing a miniaturized dialysis unit (probe) containing a dialysis membrane of a few millimeters length has become popular. The probe is implanted into the tissue or organ of the test animal and is infused with an isotonic solution (typically at 0.5-25 L/min). A steady-state osmotic flux across the membrane removes molecules with a mass below the cutoff of the membrane from the extracellular matrix. Microdialysis yields relatively clean samples of volumes in the range 20-100 jU-L. However, the recovery of neuropeptides can be as low as 0.5-15%, leading to a low neuropeptide concentration in the samples [5,6]. [Pg.1037]

The membrane removes 95% to 99% of organic compounds, bacteria, and otlier particulate matter and 90% to 97% of aU ionized and dissolved minerals but fewer of the gaseous impurities. Although the process is inadequate for producing reagent grade water for the laboratory, it may be used as a preliminary purification method. [Pg.11]

Additionally, the salt content and the type of counterions in the aqueous phases influence the emulsion stability and consequently SLM degradation. It was found that the amount of liquid membrane removed from SLM increases with a decrease in the salt concentration of the aqueous phases and with an increase in their flow velocities [83]. [Pg.108]

Fig. 3. Fabrication of polymer membrane ISEs (a) dropwise addition of casting solution to glass ring resting on glass slide (b) ring loosely covered, THF evaporates (c) ion-selective polymeric membrane forms on the slide (d) membrane removed from slide and small disk cut out and (e) pasted onto a piece of PVC tubing (f) a Ag/AgCl wire and internal reference solution complete electrode. Fig. 3. Fabrication of polymer membrane ISEs (a) dropwise addition of casting solution to glass ring resting on glass slide (b) ring loosely covered, THF evaporates (c) ion-selective polymeric membrane forms on the slide (d) membrane removed from slide and small disk cut out and (e) pasted onto a piece of PVC tubing (f) a Ag/AgCl wire and internal reference solution complete electrode.
Water can be removed from methanol by a membrane of polyvinyl alcohol cross-linked with polyacrylic acid, with a separation factor of 465.204 A polymeric hydrazone of 2,6-pyridinedialdehyde has been used to dehydrate azeotropes of water with n- and /-propyl alcohol, s- and tort butyl alcohol, and tetrahydrofuran.205 The Clostridium acetobutylicum which is used to produce 1-butanol, is inhibited by it. Pervaporation through a poly(dimethyl-siloxane) membrane filled with cyclodextrins, zeolites, or oleyl alcohol kept the concentration in the broth lower than 1% and removed the inhibition.206 Acetic acid can be dehydrated with separation factors of 807 for poly(4-methyl-l-pentene) grafted with 4-vinylpyridine,207 150 for polyvinyl alcohol cross-linked with glutaraldehyde,208 more than 1300 for a doped polyaniline film (4.1 g/m2h),209 125 for a nylon-polyacrylic acid membrane (5400 g/m2h), and 72 for a polysulfone.210 Pyridine can be dehydrated with a membrane of a copolymer of acrylonitrile and 4-styrenesulfonic acid to give more than 99% pyridine.211 A hydrophobic silicone rubber membrane removes acetone selectively from water. A hydrophilic cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol membrane removes water selectively from acetone. Both are more selective than distillation.212... [Pg.190]

Drosophila embryos are protected both by an outer layer called chorion and an impermeable and opaque vitelline membrane. Therefore preparation of whole mount Drosophila embryos for staining with antibodies and/or other fluorescent markers must go through the following steps chorion removal, fixation, vitelline membrane removal, and membrane permeabilization. The next subsection introduces the basic procedures for embryo collection and chorion removal that are common to all protocols described here, as well as the two most common fixation methods with or without methanol (the latter requiring hand devitellinization of embryos). The first one works well for immunostaining, while the second is ideal for F-actin staining with phalloidin. [Pg.168]

Ru on alumina catalyst. The water produced during the reaction permeates selectively through the membrane. Removing the product from the reaction zone increases the reactor conversion. In the range of the space velocities investigated (0.03-0.123 s ) and temperatures (480-719 K), a maximum 18 % increase in conversion over the reactor conversion attained in the absence of the membrane was observed. [Pg.72]

The termination of signaling by Gq-generated second messengers is achieved by dephosphorylation of IPS and deacylation of DAG. Removal of Ca from the cytoplasm is achieved by Ca -binding proteins and Ca " pumps. Ca pumps in the plasma membrane remove Ca from the cell whereas pumps in organellar membranes accumulate Ca to replenish intracellular Ca stores. [Pg.108]

In general, the concentration of sulfur and its compounds would likely need to be reduced to the part per billion level to protect unalloyed or palladium-silver-based membranes. Removal of sulfur to tolerable levels from feeds originating from natural gas is much more straightforward relative to removal of sulfur and other impurities from coal according to Riesenfeld and Kohl [73]. [Pg.124]

Another investigation examined the presence of acetone in breath using a membrane extraction module, a sorbent trap, and a GC with dual detectors a flame ionization detector and a mobility spectrometer. The last quarter liter portion of the stream of exhaled breath, which better reflects the content of volatile compounds in the lung tissue, was analyzed. The membrane removed much of the respired moisture, blocking interference with the analyses. ... [Pg.368]


See other pages where Membranes removal is mentioned: [Pg.453]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.856]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.998]    [Pg.1011]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.876]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.166]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.294 ]




SEARCH



Carbon dioxide: absorption removal with membranes

Dialysis membranes drug removal

Electro-membrane processes for the removal of trace toxic metal ions from water

Emulsion liquid membranes phenol removal

Example 1 Product Removal with Membranes (Extractor)

Fiber removal from membrane filter

Heavy metal removal ultrafiltration membrane

Hollow fiber membrane virus removal

Inorganic contaminants, removal from membranes

Liquid membranes toxin removal from blood

Membrane reactor, selective removal

Membrane reactor, selective removal product

Membranes for CO2 removal

Micropollutant removal, membrane bioreactor

Nutrient removal, membrane bioreactor

Pervaporation membrane reactor water removal

Removal of arsenic by nanofiltration a case study on novel membrane materials

Removal using emulsion liquid membranes

Removal using supported liquid membranes

© 2024 chempedia.info