Water selectivity

Finally, if there could be a way in which in water selective ri Jt-coordination to the carbonyl group of an a,P-imsatLirated ketone can be achieved, this would be a breakthrough, since it would subject monodentate reactants to catalysis by hard Lewis acids ". ... 

Carboxylic acids are produced in water. Selection of solvents is crucial and the carbonylation of the enol triflate 480 can be carried out in aqueous DMF, and that of the aryl triflate 481 in aqueous DMSO using dppf as a ligand[328,334]. The carbonylation of the enol triflate 482 to form the a, 0. unsaturated acid 483 using dppf as a ligand in aqueous DMF has been applied in the total synthesis of multifunctionalized glycinueclepin[335]. 

The selectivity of pervaporation membranes varies considerably and has a critical effect on the overall separation obtained. The range of results that can be obtained for the same solutions and different membranes is illustrated in Figure 41 for the separation of acetone from water using two types of membrane (89). The figure shows the concentration of acetone in the permeate as a function of the concentration in the feed. The two membranes shown have dramatically different properties. The siUcone mbber membrane removes acetone selectively, whereas the cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) membrane removes water selectively. This difference occurs because siUcone mbber is hydrophobic and mbbery, thus permeates the acetone preferentially. PVA, on the other hand, is hydrophilic and glassy, thus permeates the small hydrophilic water molecules preferentially. 

Fig. 41. The pervaporation separation of acetone—water mixtures achieved with a water-selective poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) membrane and with an acetone-selective siUcone mbber membrane. The PVA membrane is best suited to removing small amounts of water from a concentrated acetone solution, whereas the siUcone mbber membrane is best suited to removing small amounts of acetone from a dilute acetone stream (89).

The acetone-selective, siUcone mbber membrane is best used to treat dilute acetone feed streams and concentrate most of the acetone in a small volume of permeate. The water-selective, poly(vinyl alcohol) membrane is best used to treat concentrated acetone feed streams containing only a few percent water. Most of the water is then removed and concentrated in the permeate. Both membranes are more selective than distillation, which rehes on the vapor—hquid equiUbrium to achieve a separation. 

Properties of Light and Heavy Water. Selected physical properties of light and heavy water are Hsted ia Table 3 (17). Thermodynamic properties are given ia Table 4. The Hquid plus vapor critical-temperature curve for xT) (1 )H2 ) mixtures over the entire concentration range has been reported (28). 

Solubility in water, selected solvents Coefficient of thermal expansion Hardness/flexibility... 

The preferred choice of a water-selective membrane up to now has been hydrophilic membranes because of their high water affinity. However, recently Kuhn et al. reported an all-silica DDR membrane for dehydration of ethanol and methanol with high fluxes (up to 20kg m h ) and high selectivities (H20/ethanol 1500 and H20/methanol 70 at 373 K) in pervaporation operation. The separation is based on molecular sieving with water fluxes comparable to well-performing hydrophilic membranes [51]. 

The water content should be and is increasingly determined during RM preparation by Karl Fischer titration. The principle of this method is that it quantifies water selectively by measuring the consumption of iodine. During the titration, iodine oxidizes methylsulfite, formed from methanol and sulfur dioxide in a first step, to methylsulfate under stoichiometric involvement of water. Complete reac-... 

Fig. 3. HNCA (a) and two implementations of HNCA-TROSY (b-c) experiments for recording intraresidual HN(/), 15N(/), 13C"(i) and sequential 1 HN(7), l5N(/), 13Ca(i — 1) correlations in 13C/15N/2H labelled proteins. Narrow and wide bars correspond to 90° and 180° flip angles, respectively, applied with phase x unless otherwise indicated. Half-ellipse denotes water selective 90° pulse to obtain water-flip-back.88,89 All 90°...

In a previous section, the effect of plasma on PVA surface for pervaporation processes was also mentioned. In fact, plasma treatment is a surface-modification method to control the hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity balance of polymer materials in order to optimize their properties in various domains, such as adhesion, biocompatibility and membrane-separation techniques. Non-porous PVA membranes were prepared by the cast-evaporating method and covered with an allyl alcohol or acrylic acid plasma-polymerized layer the effect of plasma treatment on the increase of PVA membrane surface hydrophobicity was checked [37].The allyl alcohol plasma layer was weakly crosslinked, in contrast to the acrylic acid layer. The best results for the dehydration of ethanol were obtained using allyl alcohol treatment. The selectivity of treated membrane (H20 wt% in the pervaporate in the range 83-92 and a water selectivity, aH2o, of 250 at 25 °C) is higher than that of the non-treated one (aH2o = 19) as well as that of the acrylic acid treated membrane (aH2o = 22). 

This means an increase of the flux (J) and water selectivity (P) for the modified membrane - due to the surface properties modification by plasma treatment - comparing to the untreated membrane. 

ST2-PT thus results in a 2D [15N, H]-correlation spectrum that contains only the most slowly relaxing component of the 2D 15N- H multiplet. The data are processed as described by Kay et al. [44] in an echo/antiecho manner. Water saturation is minimized by keeping the water magnetization along the z-axis during the entire experiment, which is achieved by the application of the water-selective 90° rf pulses indicated by curved shapes on the line H. It was reported that on some NMR instruments the phase cycle mentioned above does select the desired multiplet component. On these instruments, the replacements of S, with S, = y, x for the first FID and 9, =... 

D NOE-pumping experiment. E Reverse NOE pumping experiment (bottom) and reference experiment (top). F e-PHOGSY NOESY sequence. The water-selective 180° pulse sandwiched by the first two gradients has a gaussian shape and a duration of 40-50 ms. The mixing time is approx. 2 s. For further details, see Refs. [29, 30]. 

A dermal absorption rate of 329 mnol/minute/cm ( 60 nmol/minute/cm ) was calculated for the shaved abdominal skin of mice (Tsumta 1975). This is equivalent to a human absorption rate of 29.7 mg/minute, assuming that a pair of hands are immersed in liquid chloroform (Tsumta 1975). However, this calculation was based on the assumptions that the rate of chloroform penetration is uniform for all kinds of skin and that the total surface area of a pair of human hands is 800 cm the former assumption is especially dubious. Islam et al. (1995) investigated the fate of topically applied chloroform in male hairless rats. For exposures under 4 minutes, chloroform-laden water was applied to shaved back skin for exposures of 4-30 minutes, rats were submerged in baths containing chloroform-laden water. Selected skin areas were tape-stripped a various number of times after various delay periods. It appeared that there was an incremental build-up of chloroform in the skin over the first four minutes. When compared to uptake measured by bath concentration differences, approximately 88% of lost chloroform was not accounted for in the stratum comeum and was assumed to be systemically absorbed. 

Islam et al. (1995) investigated the fate of topically applied chloroform in male hairless rats. For exposures under 4 minutes, chloroform-laden water was applied to shaved back skin for exposures of 4-30 minutes, rats were submerged in baths containing chloroform-laden water. Selected skin areas were tape-stripped a... 

The catalytic esterification of ethanol and acetic acid to ethyl acetate and water has been taken as a representative example to emphasize the potential advantages of the application of membrane technology compared with conventional distillation [48], see Fig. 13.6. From the McCabe-Thiele diagram for the separation of ethanol-water mixtures it follows that pervaporation can reach high water selectivities at the azeotropic point in contrast to the distillation process. Considering the economic evaluation of membrane-assisted esterifications compared with the conventional distillation technique, a decrease of 75% in energy input and 50% lower investment and operation costs can be calculated. The characteristics of the membrane and the module design mainly determine the investment costs of membrane processes, whereas the operational costs are influenced by the hfetime of the membranes. 

---