Meetings task list

As noted on the chart, the facilitator schedules a follow-up meeting that includes the team and the supervisor of the area where the kaizen event took place. All tasks are reviewed and target dates updated. Ownership of the task list changes from the facilitator to the supervisor at the end of this meeting. 

One essential element of a team-based safety program is a team task list. The safety team s task list is the company s safety program outline document. It guides the team by listing open tasks, annual reviews, and training requirements, successes, and other relevant information. It should be used by the team leader to conduct a bi-weekly meeting of the safety team. Their agenda could be as follows ... 

Request all work requests The outcome of the initial outage management team meeting will generate a complete list of all approved maintenance tasks that are to be included in the outage plan. To complete the process, the planner should request any other tasks that may be included. This request should ... 

At the 1990 International Task Force for Vaccine Development meeting in New York, a children s vaccine initiative (CVI) was set up with the aim of developing an ideal vaccine. The following criteria were established although the list may not be totally inclusive. 

List of members of the FOREGS Geochemistry Task Force 1997-2001. These persons, whose name is printed in bold are officially nominated as contact persons. Others have participated in meetings and other activities. 

The first and very important part of any plan is the exact definition of the aim, as explained in the previous chapter. This is followed by a list or sequence of major tasks or sections which each must be accomplished in order to achieve the aim. Since these major sections each define critical steps of the project, success criteria or objectives for each of these must be described and agreed. These objectives should specifically address known or potential difficulties (in our example the purity of antigen that is needed, the required test systems, etc.) and should be defined as exactly as possible at this stage and updated when necessary. The definition of objectives requires a reasonable knowledge of the subject and should thus be discussed and agreed with the specialists in these fields and with those who have to meet these objectives. 

EPA is faced with many tasks in the future development of the Toxicity Characteristic. These include the completion of work to develop transport equations for use in predicting the fate and transport of the elemental toxicants, development of regulatory thresholds for the remaining hazardous constituents listed in the RCRA regulations, and development of analytical methods to permit the measurement of the hazardous constituents in the TCLP extract at the health-based threshold level. We expect to complete these in a timely manner to meet the regulatory needs for the enhanced protection of human health and the environment. 

In order to structure the decision making process around the positive list efficiently, a formal advisory committee can be established. It should consist of medical and pharmaceutical experts, and have ready access to internationally recognized experts in the held of clinical pharmacology who can be consulted when necessary. This committee will on request provide advice as to whether particular products meet the criteria for reimbursement. The committee may also be accorded the task of periodically revising the drug list and make proposals for delehng obsolete items. 

HazCom area managers ensure that a list of the hazardous chemicals (using identities referenced on the appropriate MSDSs) known to be present in the woik area is accessible to SNL personnel and that SNL personnel are informed of the hazards associated with nonroutine tasks and with chemicals contained in unlabeled pipes. (This may be accomplished through site-specific training, health and safety meetings, and technical woik documents.)... 

The measurements of performance capacities associated with human functions should conform to certain criteria. Details can be found in Brand and Crownshield [ 1981 ] and Chaffin [ 1982]. A general set of psychometric criteria is also discussed by Sanders and McCormick [1993]. It includes measurement accuracy, reliability, validity, sensitivity, and freedom from contamination. Meeting these criteria depends not only on the instruments used but also on the methods of analysis and the expertise of the analyst. It is almost impossible to satisfy these criteria perfectly, especially when the task is being performed in its natural environment (as opposed to a laboratory simulation). However, the analyst must always be aware of them and must be pragmatic in measuring task variables. Meister [1985] lists the following practical requirements for measurements (1) objective, (2) quantitative, (3) unobtrusive, (4) easy to collect, (5) requiring no special data-coUection techniques or instrumentation, and (6) of relatively low cost in terms of money and effort by the experimenter. However, these are not necessarily mutually exclusive. 

The apparently mundane task of collecting together the analytical samples to be analyzed in a sample batch run, together with the appropriate blanks, calibrators and QCs, is a crucial component of a successful analysis. A batch list that describes of all the components needed for an analytical run should be prepared prior to the initiation of any work. In addition, a list of all samples that will be analyzed in the run, a description of all standards, QCs and blanks that need to be prepared is often included as part of the batch list. Depending on the apphcation, the types and number of blanks (extracted and/or solvent) that wiU be nsed may vary but in many instances at least one matrix blank with no internal standard (double blank) and one blank with internal standard should be included. The control matrix that is used for preparation of the extracted blanks shonld be screened prior to use (Section 9.4.7), to ensure that no appreciable interfering peaks that would impede the abdity to meet acceptance criteria elute at the retention time(s) of the analyte(s) of interest. 

---