Extracted blanks

An extract blank (i.e., distilled water only) was also included throughout the extraction procedure to ensure that all isolated compounds were of biological origin. 

Comparison of the peak height or areas of extracted standard samples to the peak height or areas obtained when the extracted blank spiked with analyte is injected at the same concentration as the sample extracted. 

The extracted blank spiked with analyte is an aliquot of blank matrix that is extracted and spiked with the appropriate neat standard solution prepared to be equivalent to an extracted standard. 

If online extraction techniques are used, calculation of the different types of recovery could be particularly challenging. Different approaches has been used in literature to overcome this problem, such as using an external injection valve for adding the neat solution to the extracted blank from the online extraction column just on the head of the analytical column [9,10]. Although liquid matrix can be extracted directly, a solid matrix such as tissue needs to be disrupted in... 

Hydrochloric acid (1 ml 5 M) is added to 10 ml water in a 100 ml volumetric flask. Olsen soil reagent or Olsen extractant (blank) (both 10 ml) are then added and the flask swirled until all effervescence has ceased. Murphy-Riley... 

The extraction recovery was investigated by the comparison of prepared QC samples with extracted blank samples that were reconstituted with the nominal amount of drug and internal standard in working solution. 

NOTE The injection volume for all sample extracts, blanks, quality control (QC) samples and calibration solutions shall he the same. 

A unique property of LC/API/MS is the extent to which the analyte signal is affected by the sample matrix or the existence of co-eluting analytes. This property can have a profound influence on sensitivity and assay reproducibility. Because of matrix-ion suppression, it is not possible to estimate extraction recovery by comparison of the signal from a neat sample to an extracted sample. This is because the reduction in signal represents the combined effects of recovery and ion suppression. As first shown by Buhrman et al., quantitative assessment of extraction efficiency is made by spiking the neat sample into an extracted blank and comparison of the result to a similar sample spiked before extraction [120]. Conversely, the extent of ion suppression is obtained by the comparison of the signals for a neat unextracted sample to the same neat solution spiked into an extracted matrix blank. 

The following results illustrate the effect of yew extracts on taxoid titers. Initial studies involved T.andreanae and continued with P. raistrickii H10BA2. Table 5 shows the results of several different experiments in which T. andreanae was grown with either 1% or 1.5 % yew broth in the medium. Experiment 5-39 titers are from the methylene chloride extracts of the fungal broth of T. andreanae. Experiments 5-2,5-3, and 5-22 show the combined methylene chloride extracts of the broth, freeze dried extracts, and mycelial extracts. Blanks are uninoculated broths... 

Extraction blank control control performing all steps of the extraction procedure except addition of the test portion (e.g., by substitution of water for the test portion). It is used to demonstrate the absence of contaminating nucleic acid during extraction. If many PCR analyses are performed on DNA extracted in separate series, all the appropriate extraction blank controls are included. It can also be used instead of the amplification reagent control. 

To each tissue extract, blank, or standard solution containing C-mternal standards, prepared as described above, is added 10... 

C. To this solution of [ H]-dansyl chloride is added 2 )xL of the tissue extract, blank, or standard solution. Dansylation is allowed to proceed at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. Solvents are then removed by evaporation (dry N2) and the residue is resuspended in 5 xL acetone.acetic acid (3 2 v/v) at 4°C. 

As previously discussed (Section 9.4.7b), extracted control matrix is used to assess the selectivity for the method under development. The selectivity of the method is a function of the sample preparation (extraction and clean-up), chromatography and mass spectrometry conditions that are used for the method. Assuming that the control matrix is representative of the sample matrix to be analyzed, and that method blanks have been used to demonstrate that the method is free of exogenous interferences due to solvents, or to containers or other apparatus (a source of interferences that is often overlooked in the method development process), an extracted blank is used to demonstrate that the method has sufficient selectivity for the intended analytical purpose. When interferences at the expected retention time of the analyte being quantified are detected, modifications to the sample preparation and chromatography (and sometimes the ions monitored hy the method) can be made to improve the selectivity of the method. Recall (Section 9.4.7b) that only re-analysis of incurred samples can reveal interferences resulting from metahoUtes or degradates of the analyte with either or both of the analyte and SIS. 

Blanks are a vital component of the lahoratory quality control process. They are incorporated into all method development, vahdation and sample analysis schemes to monitor and mitigate laboratory contamination (Section 9.7.1). Also, with LC-MS calibration curves often covering up to three orders of magnitude, carryover due to insufficient rinsing of the syringe needle or autoinjector is common and blanks (extracted blanks in particular) are used to assess and quantify the impact of the carryover on the final method (Section 9.7.2). 

The only direct technique for monitoring contamination in the laboratory is to use various types of blanks (Section 9.5.6b) at strategic locations or steps in the method. Depending on the nature of the analyte and matrix, laboratory contamination may only be detected in extracted matrix blanks, and therefore at least one extracted matrix blank should be included with every method development, validation and sample analysis batch note that the preparation of extracted blanks in duplicate is often considered to be the minimum requirement for many methods. Solvent blanks and method blanks can also be invaluable with respect to detecting contamination in the laboratory, but these should always be used in conjunction with extracted blanks unless specific experiments or historical data show that they are equivalent to extracted blanks in this respect for the method in question. 

The best assessment for selectivity of a method is achieved with the use of matrix extracted blanks that are prepared from control matrix that is representative of the sample matrix. This allows checking that ions with mJz values characteristic of analyte or SIS are not observed at the crucial retention times in chromatograms for the blank. A detailed account of how blanks of this type are used in method development to ensure selectivity is given in Section 9.4.7b. 

The apparently mundane task of collecting together the analytical samples to be analyzed in a sample batch run, together with the appropriate blanks, calibrators and QCs, is a crucial component of a successful analysis. A batch list that describes of all the components needed for an analytical run should be prepared prior to the initiation of any work. In addition, a list of all samples that will be analyzed in the run, a description of all standards, QCs and blanks that need to be prepared is often included as part of the batch list. Depending on the apphcation, the types and number of blanks (extracted and/or solvent) that wiU be nsed may vary but in many instances at least one matrix blank with no internal standard (double blank) and one blank with internal standard should be included. The control matrix that is used for preparation of the extracted blanks shonld be screened prior to use (Section 9.4.7), to ensure that no appreciable interfering peaks that would impede the abdity to meet acceptance criteria elute at the retention time(s) of the analyte(s) of interest. 

Absolute matrix effect can be calculated by comparing signal intensity of the analyte in the presence (i.e., spiked into the extracted blank matrix) and absence of the extracted matrix (i.e., spiked into a neat solution). 

Matrix Effect and Recovery For LC-MS/ MS-based methods, the signal suppression or enhancement of the analyte due to the presence of the matrix interferences (matrix effects) in MS/MS detection should be evaluated by comparing the response (peak area) of the analyte and the IS from the extracted blank samples post-fortified with the analyte and the IS with the response of neat solutions with both the analyte and the IS at the same concentrations as above. Matrix effects should be evaluated in one pooled batch of animal matrix or in at least three different batches of human matrix, using three replicates at a minimum of three QC concentrations (e.g., low quality control [LQC], medium quality control [MQC], high quality control [HQC]) with IS at working concentration. The coefficient of variation (CV%) of the matrix effect variability should be <15% at each concentration level and between the three (LQC, MQC, and HQC) concentration levels. 

Carryover Carryover can be assessed by analyzing an extracted blank sample right after each ULOQ standard sample. The carryover is considered acceptable when the response in the blank sample injection is 0% of the mean LLOQ response of the analyte and the response in the blank sample injection is % of the IS response at the working concentration. If these criteria cannot be met, then additional strategies should be carried out to minimize the carryover during the sample analysis. 

Similar to QC samples, recovery assessment samples are prepared by spiking 10 pL of the standard working solution into 990 pL extracted blank monkey plasma (supernatant) to make the final concentrations of 30,500, and 3760 ng/mL. 

Matrix effect assessment Six replicates of ribavirin neat solutions (30, 500, and 3760 ng/mL) are spiked into extracted blank plasma samples. The matrix effect is estimated by comparing the mean peak area of ribavirin in the above sample extract with the mean peak area of the corresponding neat solution with ribavirin concentrations the same as the above. 

---