Toxicity characteristic

However, rotary furnaces tend to produce more exhaust gas and fumes, require more skill fill manipulation, and are more labor intensive. Also, the slags produced in the rotary furnaces, soda or fayaUte [13918-37-1] slags, normally do not pass the toxic characteristic leach procedure (TCLP) test and pose a disposal problem. 

Another level of regulatory significance is the toxic characteristic leach procedure (TCLP) limit of a characteristic waste. A material which is a waste because of the TCLP is ha2ardous if a Hquor resulting from an 18-h leach in an acetic acid buffer exceeds 5 ppm (mg/L) lead in the leach Hquor. 

A sohd waste is considered hazardous if it is either a Hsted waste or a characteristic waste. Listed wastes include a Hst of specific processes that generate a waste and a Hst of discarded commercial chemical products. There are four hazardous waste characteristics ignitabiHty, corrosivity, reactivity, and toxicity. The last refers to the leachabiHty of a waste and the resultant toxicity in the groundwater using the analytical method referred to as toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). A Hst of substances included under TCLP is shown in Table 1. 

Table 1. Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for Toxicity Characteristic...

Spill prevention control and countermeasure plan (SPCC Plan) Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)... 

Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure," Code ofPederalBegulations, 40 CFR, Pt. 261, Appendix II, Method 1311. 

Field Measurement Conditions Those gathering samples must be aware of the temperature, pressure, flamm ihty, and toxic characteristics of the samples for which they will be responsible. This is particularly important when samples are taken from unfamihar locations. Sample ports will have to be blown down to obtain representative samples. Liquid samples will have to be vented. Temperatures above... 

Physical and chemical tests of the final product may need to address two concerns (1) whether the solidified waste exhibits any RCRA defined toxicity characteristics or could be delisted and (2) the potential long term fate of treated materials in the disposal environment. Three tests are available which address the first concern. These are the Extraction Procedure (EP Tox) (40 CFR 261, Appendix II, 1980) and the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) (40 CFR 261, Appendix II, 1986), and the Multiple Extraction Procedure Test (40 CFR 261, Appendix II, January 1989). It is important to note that these tests are not indicators of expected leachate quality but of potentials. A solidified product which cannot pass the appropriate test (EP Tox or TCLP) would be subject to classification as a hazardous waste. 

Federal Register - Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure, Revised 40 CFR 261, Appendix II, 1986. 

The fluids from the reserve pit may be hauled away from location for disposal, reclaimed insitu, or pumped into the wellbore given a dryhole. The operator of the wellsite is responsible for the transportation offsite of the drilling fluids. The fluids may be considered hazardous in nature due to the toxic characteristics of most drilling and completion fluids. 

Secondly, customers are applying ever greater pressures on formulators to make less use of some chemistries, for example formaldehyde release biocides. Customers would prefer preservatives that are good for die environment and possess no adverse mammalian toxicity characteristics. This would require that new actives are developed. This is unlikely considering the new regulatory frameworks. 

Preclinical drug development also involves animal testing [61]. Data from one rodent species and one nonrodent species are usually collected to determine the absorption, metabolism, and toxicity characteristics of the compound. Both short-term (2 weeks to 3 months) and long-term (up to several years) studies are done. The long-term studies are particularly useful for... 

Few studies have been conducted to determine organic residues in spent foundry sand and leachates from disposal sites. It is reported that several organic compounds are present in the spent foundry sand but have concentrations below the regulated toxicity characteristic limits. Organic compounds of concern include benzoic acid, naphthalene, methylnaphthalenes, phenol, methylenebisphenol, diethylphenol, and 3-methylbutanoic acids.12 These compounds are thought to be derived from the decomposition of organic binders such as phenolic urethane, furan, and alkyd isocyanate. 

RCRA was passed to manage nonhazardous and hazardous wastes and underground storage tanks, with an emphasis placed on the recovery of reusable materials as an alternative to their disposal. This act introduced the concept of the separate management of hazardous and nonhazardous wastes, and defined procedures to identify whether a waste is hazardous or nonhazardous. A waste exhibits the characteristic of toxicity, classified as a hazardous material, if the concentration of any of 39 selected analytes in the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) extract exceed regulatory action levels. 

Petrochemical recovered oil. Organic chemical manufacturing facilities sometimes recover oil from their organic chemical industry operations. U.S. EPA excluded petrochemical recovered oil from the definition of solid waste when the facility inserts the material into the petroleum-refining process of an associated or adjacent petroleum refinery. Only petrochemical recovered oil that is hazardous because it exhibits the characteristic of ignitability or exhibits the toxicity characteristic for benzene (or both) is eligible for the exclusion. 

Arsenically treated wood. Discarded arsenically treated wood or wood products that are hazardous only because they exhibit certain toxic characteristics (e.g., contain harmful concentrations of metal or pesticide constituents), are excluded from the definition of hazardous waste. Once such treated wood is used, it may be disposed of by the user (commercial or residential) without being subject to hazardous waste regulation. This exclusion is based on the fact that the use of such wood products on the land is similar to the common disposal method, which is landfilling. This exclusion applies only to end-users and not to manufacturers. 

However, there is one exception to using the TCLP to identify a waste as hazardous. The DC Circuit Court, in Association of Battery Recyclers vs. U.S. EPA, vacated the use of the TCLP to determine whether manufactured gas plant (MGP) wastes exhibit the characteristic of toxicity. As previously stated, the TCLP replicates the leaching process in municipal landfills. The court found that U.S. EPA did not produce sufficient evidence that co-disposal of MGP wastes from remediation sites with municipal solid waste (MSW) has happened or is likely to happen. On March 13, 2002, in response to the court vacatur, U.S. EPA codified language exempting MGP waste from the toxicity characteristic regulation. 

To recap, determining whether a waste exhibits the toxicity characteristic involves two principal... 

If a waste exhibits the TC, it carries the waste code associated with the compound or element that exceeded the regulatory level. Table 13.3 presents the toxicity characteristic waste codes, regulated constituents, and regulatory levels. 

Plasma arc vitrification, developed by Retech, uses a plasma centrifugal furnace, where heat from transferred arc plasma creates a molten bath that detoxifies the feed material. Organic contaminants vaporize and react at temperatures between 2000 and 2500°F to form innocuous products. Solids are melted and vitrified in the molten bath at 2800 to 3000°F. When metals are cooled, they are rendered to a nonleachable, glassy residue that meets the toxicity characteristic leachate procedure (TCLP) criteria. 

---