Meeting documentation

Are there periodic software development review meetings and are these meetings documented ... 

Orders should only be placed with suppliers who have been assessed and subsequently authorized to supply a product meeting documented acceptance criteria. 

The first session of the Preparatory Committee for Development of a SAICM was held in Bangkok, from 9 to 13 November 2003 ( PrepcomI ). The second session of a SAICM was held in Nairobi, Kenya, from 4 to 8 October 2004 ( Prepcom2 ). Background information and meeting documents for SAICM-PrepcomI and Prepcom2 can be found at UNEP s website. 

There are three main items included in meeting documentation. 

Sessions—IPCC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate, http //www.ipcc.ch/meeting documentation/meeting documentation ipcc sessions and ipcc wgs sessions.shtml (accessed February 24,2014). 

The QAP system additionally was developped for inspection documentation purposes to meet the modern requirements in process documentation (ISO 9000). It is the basic system required to install a fully automated inspection by a camera system and image processing. 

Redaction of the draft was finished during the meeting of September 1997, and it has been sent for two-month enquiry in December 1997. The ad hoc group is now expecting the comments drawn by this enquiry to proceed to the revision of the document and to get it ready for six-month enquiry. 

Information on CEN/TC138/AHG3, such as the draft document, the minutes of meetings, the list of references and the members addresses, may be obtained on Internet on the BAM server at http //trappist.kb,bam-berlin.de/CEN/cenalig3.html. 

The primary thmst of GMP is that it is not enough merely to make chemicals to meet USP or other apphcable specifications. The chemicals must be made under clean and sanitary conditions, procedures and processes must be vahdated and documented, and processing and packaging must be carried out under conditions that preclude mixup and mislabeling. Records must be kept of complaints, and the manufacturer must know enough about the storage properties of the products to specify storage conditions and, if necessary, expiration dates on the label. 

Personal computers have introduced new ways to handle pdvate biblographic and text files. The most important factors to consider to achieve satisfactory results in building a bibhographic or text database are the type of information to be stored and the needs of the user. Types of information include correspondence, research results and documentation, meeting notes, and bibliographic references. Needs of the user to be considered should include the potential number of users of the database, restrictions for the access and display of the information because of privacy or proprietary reasons, and the retrieval mechanisms (eg, by keyword, authority list, controUed vocabulary, author, tide, date, or other document or information attributes). In addition, criteria for selecting and encoding information for the database need to be established. 

In addition to utiHty patents, some countries pubHsh patent documents under different or less stringent standards for patentabiHty and with shorter patent terms. For example, plant patents cover asexually reproduced plants. Design patents cover the decorative aspects of a product. UtiHty models and petty patents cover products with differences from the prior art that need not meet the nonobviousness standards set for utiHty patents. 

Ihe Use of Mineral and Synthetic Fibers, Working Documents (Part 1) of ILO Meeting of Experts, Geneva, Swit2edand, Apr. 17—25, 1989, International Labor Organization, 1989, p. 47. 

Construction and equipment meet the design specifications. Obtaining field verification or performing document review for the new or modified process can validate design specifications for construction and equipment. If a change is not physical (such as a setpoint for an interlock shutdown), the method for the change and its anticipated effects should be reviewed. 

All tollers should eventually be assessed regarding their own quality improvement programs as well as meeting requirements. This can be done either formally, such as with an assessment process and form, or informally through normal communications. In either case, the results of the toller assessment should be documented and well understood within the organization. 

When owners wish to build a new source which will add a specific amount of a specific pollutant to an area that is innonattainment with respect to that pollutant, they must, under U.S. federal regulations, document a reduction of at least that amount of the pollutant from another source in the area. They can effect this reduction, or "offset," as it is called, in another plant they own in the area or can shut down that plant. However, if they do not own another such plant or do not wish to shut down or effect such reduction in a plant they own, they can seek the required reduction or offset from another owner. Thus, such offsets are marketable credits that can be bought, sold, traded, or stockpiled ("banked") as long as the state or local regulatory agency legitimizes, records, and certificates these transactions. The new source will still have to meet NSPS, BACT or MACT, and/or LAER standards, whichever are applicable. 

After the coordination meeting, the user will begin receiving drawings, reports, and all the documents called for in the contract. These are reviewed and returned to the vendor as reviewed without comment, or... 

While not exactly labels, repositionable paper notes, such as Post-iF Notes, and tape flags (u.sed to call a reader s attention to certain pages in a document) have to meet similar types of release requirements. Like linerless labels, reliable... 

Although numerous cases have been documented where petroleum refineries have simultaneously reduced pollution outputs and operating costs through pollution prevention techniques, there are often barriers to their im-plementation. The primary barrier to most pollution prevention projects is cost. Many pollution prevention options simply do not pay for themselves, or the economics often appear marginal. Corporate investments typically must earn an adequate return on invested capital for the shareholders and some pollution prevention options at some facilities may not meet the requirements set by company policies. 

To be successful, a team selected from different groups within the project team should participate in the preparation and review of these plans. In addition, a schedule of the review and approval process for these plans needs to be established, accepted by all reviewers, and distributed before release of the first draft. Reviewers should meet an established schedule for review and submission of comments. A distinction between review and approval authority should be determined. The review process determines if all of the required elements are identified. This review can take considerable time, depending on the complexity of the project. The approval process is important when all comments are incorporated. The key responsible persons associated with the project should accept and approve the changes to the document. 

There is no mention that a prior hazard assessment will be acceptable. It is only common sense that OSHA would not expect employers with a previously documented hazard assessment program that meets the new requirements to perform another assessment. Yet there is no way of knowing if this will be acceptable. Employers should use good judgment on what is an effective hazard assessment. Bear in mind, hazard assessment should incorporate any applicable American National Standards... 

---