Marginal hazard

Figure 1. Relationship between SED-TOX scores and mean Sediment Quality Guideline (SQG) quotients. Scores varying between 0.1 and 0.9 represent a marginal hazard scores between 1.0 and 1.9 indicate a moderate hazard and scores greater or equal to 2.0 represent a high hazard potential.

Marginal - hazard can cause illness, injury or equipment damage, but the results would not be expected to be serious. 3... 

A marginal hazard is a hazard that has a Category III (Marginal) severity level, as defined by the hazard severity criteria in MIL-STD-882. 

In many cases, the inherent safety advantages of one process are clear when compared with alternatives. One or more hazards may be significantly reduced, while others are unaffected or only marginally increased. For example, aqueous latex paints are clearly inherently safer than solvent based paints, although there are applications where the increased performance of solvent based paints justifies their use, with the appropriate layers of protection. 

A newly emerging concern of chemistry is sustainable development, the economical utilization and renewal of resources coupled with hazardous waste reduction and concern for the environment. This sensitive approach to the environment and our planetary inheritance is known colloquially as green chemistry. Where we s think it appropriate to draw your attention to this important development, we dis- I ( play the small icon shown here in the margin. 

NOAEL (no-observed-adverse-effect level) is defined as the highest dose at which no adverse effects are observed in the most susceptible animal species. The NOAEL is used as a basis for setting human safety standards for acceptable daily intakes (ADIs), taking into account uncertainty factors for extrapolation from animals to humans and inter-individual variabilities of humans. The adequacy of any margin of safety or margin of exposure must consider the nature and quality of the available hazard identification and dose-response data and the reliability and relevance of the exposure estimations. In some cases, no adverse endpoint can be identified such as for many naturally occurring compounds that are widespread in foods. In that case, an ADI Not Specified is assigned. ... 

A 100 Degree Rule was often used in the past throughout the chemical industry to assess whether an accident would occur. According to this rule, if the operating temperature of a process is 100 "C away from the nearest detectable exotherm observed in DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) experiment the operation will not experience this thermal event. In such a case no more detailed information on hazards need be searched for. The 100°C degree rule is, however, often far from the safety margin The use of this rule was the reason of many accidents. 

Settlements can be estimated, although the margin for error is large. Secure commercial hazardous waste landfills have the smallest displacement, <1.5%. Displacements at new larger solid waste landfills can be estimated at 15%, while older, unregulated facilities with mixed wastes have settlements of up to 50%. 

The universal waste transportation requirements are not onerous. Because they are not defined as hazardous wastes, universal wastes in the United States do not need to be accompanied by a hazardous waste manifest, or shipped by a hazardous waste transporter. Even so, transportation is where many generators lose money and where many recyclers make their margins. 

Highly toxic air pollutants fall under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act. Unlike criteria pollutants, these hazardous air pollutants must be controlled to protect the public health with an "ample margin of safety." Implied in this language is the belief in a discrete threshold of exposure below which no effects occur and from which a safety margin can be measured. Subsequent interpretations, however, indicated clearly that Congress did not equate safeguarding the public health with complete risk elimination. 

To sum up, the factors that enable the supply side to fix prices above the marginal cost are (a) the imperfect agency relationship between the doctor (the agent) and the insurer (the principal) the prescriber may prefer the brand product, about which he or she has acquired knowledge and experience during the patent period (risk aversion), (b) the patient, and sometimes also the doctor, may have imperfect information on the quality of cheaper alternatives, and (c) the lack of incentives to change prescription habits (moral hazard). 

The moral hazard associated with health insurance is twofold that which occurs ex ante, which consists in failing to prevent health problems because he or she knows that he or she is protected in the event of falling ill, and expost moral hazard, which is what occurs when rational consumers consume quantities that are greater than the optimum once they fall ill, because the marginal cost for the co-insured patient is lower than the marginal cost of production. 

Note that this index only produces a relative number. Two products with widely different values of the index might be equally safe if, in fact, neither impedes escape. Conversely, two products with apparently similar values may produce different hazard levels if both products are close to the margin of safety. Thus, the scale for any index must be "calibrated", and it may well be different for each building or type of occupant. Generally, this will require a more complete hazard analysis and/or full-scale fire tests. Protocols for doing this are currently under consideration. 

The results of a public opinion survey on the hazards of chemicals are shown in Figure 1-5. This survey asked the participants if they would say chemicals do more good than harm, more harm than good, or about the same amount of each. The results show an almost even three-way split, with a small margin to those who considered the good and harm to be equal. 

A natural gas wellhead is located 400 m from an instrument control room. The control room is a potential ignition hazard in the event of a leak of natural gas (essentially pure methane). Studies have shown that a suitable safety margin is imposed if the downwind gas concentration is determined using one-half the LFL. For methane this represents a concentration of 2.5 vol. %. 

---