Fiber-matrix composites

Assuming the work of adhesion to be measurable, one must next ask if it can be related to practical adhesion. If so, it may be a useful predictor of adhesion. The prospect at first looks bleak. The perfect disjoining of phases contemplated by Eq. 1 almost never occurs, and it takes no account of the existence of an interphase , as discussed earlier. Nonetheless, modeling the complex real interphase as a true mathematical interface has led to quantitative relationships between mechanical quantities and the work of adhesion. For example, Cox [22] suggested a linear relationship between Wa and the interfacial shear strength, r, in a fiber-matrix composite as follows ... 

Fig. 19. Inlerfacial shear strengths of various fiber/matrix composites as a function of the work of adhesion as determined by IGC. 1, glass fiber-poly (ethylene) 2, carbon fiber-epoxy B 3, carbon fiber-epoxy A and 4, carbon fiber-PEEK. Redrawn from ref. [102].

It is widely perceived that carbon nanotubes will allow construction of composites with extraordinary strength weight ratios, due to the inherent strength of the nanotubes. Several rules of thumb have been developed in the study of fiber/matrix composites. Close inspection of these shows that carbon nanotubes satisfy several criteria, but that others remain untested (and therefore unsatisfied to date). High-strength com-... 

The fiber fragmentation test is at present one of the most popular methods to evaluate the interface properties of fiber-matrix composites. Although the loading geometry employed in the test method closely resembles composite components that have been subjected to uniaxial tension, the mechanics required to determine the interface properties are the least understood. 

Most fiber-matrix composites (FMCs) are named according to the type of matrix involved. Metal-matrix composites (MMCs), ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs), and polymer-matrix composites (PMCs) have completely different structures and completely different applications. Oftentimes the temperatnre at which the composite mnst operate dictates which type of matrix material is to be nsed. The maximum operating temperatures of the three types of FMCs are listed in Table 1.27. 

In Section 1.4.2, we described several classification schemes for composites, including one that is based upon the distribution of the constituents. For reinforced composites, this scheme is quite useful, as shown in Figure 1.75. In reinforced composites, the reinforcement is the structural constituent and determines the internal structure of the composite. The reinforcement may take on the form of particulates, flakes, lamina, or fibers or may be generally referred to as filler. Fibers are the most common type of reinforcement, resulting in fiber-matrix composites (FMCs). Let us examine some of these reinforcement constituents in more detail. 

Fiber-Matrix Composites. As shown in Figure 1.75, there are two main classifications of FMCs those with continuous fiber reinforcement and those with discontinuous fiber reinforcement. Continuous-flber-reinforced composites are made from fiber rovings (bundles of twisted filaments) that have been woven into two-dimensional sheets resembling a cloth fabric. These sheets can be cut and formed to a desired shape, or preform, that is then incorporated into a composite matrix, typically a thermosetting resin such as epoxy. Metallic, ceramic, and polymeric fibers of specific compositions can all be produced in continuous fashions, and the properties of the... 

As first described in Section 1.4.2, there are a number of ways of further classifying fiber-matrix composites, such as according to the fiber and matrix type—for example, glass-fiber-reinforced polymer composites (GFRP) or by fiber orientation. In this section, we utilize all of these combinations to describe the mechanical properties of some important fiber-reinforced composites. Again, not all possible combinations are covered, but the principles involved are applicable to most fiber-reinforced composites. We begin with some theoretical aspects of strength and modulus in composites. 

Of the three physical properties covered in this chapter, optical properties have the least importance in composite and biological applications. This is not to say that there are no applications of optical properties in composites or biological materials. There are indeed, such as the use of birefringence in the analysis of stress distribution and fiber breakage in fiber-matrix composites [14] and in the development of materials for ophthalmic implants such as intraocular devices [15]. These topics are beyond the scope of this text, however, even as optional information, and introduce no new concepts from a material property standpoint. There are many interesting articles and... 

A. Razgon and C. N. Sukenik, C. N., Ceramic Coatings for Fiber Matrix Composites Titania thin films on bismaleimide-glass fiber composites, J. Mater. Res. 20, 25440-2552 (2005). 

In the early stages of bone formation, the osteons dominate the bone structure to make an overall structure of fiber-matrix composite. While the primary bone has a dense structure, the secondary bone structure is this composite. As a result, the cortical bone structure becomes very complex. It is microscopically porous, has a lamellar structure, and is also a fiber-matrix composite. Size and packing of osteons and canals, and their orientation, determine the mechanical properties of these bones. 

In an analogous way to collagen In mammalian connective tissues and cellulose In plant cell walls. All of these tissues can be classified as fiber-matrix composites in the cell walls of higher plants the cellulose fibrils are surrounded by other polysaccharides, proteins, and also lignin In some cases In... 

The effect of the polyamide benzimidazole group on the surface wettability and interfacial adhesion of fiber/matrix composites of two kinds of aramid fibers from poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) (Kevlar-49) and poly-(polyamide benzimidazole-co-p-phenylene terephthalamide) (DAFIII) have been... 

The fundamental basis of nanosciences is the creation of nanoobjects as well as the study of their properties. Superimposed, moreover, is knowledge allowing the transformation of nanoobjects into material. This corresponds to the discovery and the development of specific assembly and organization methods. It is also necessary that these methods be able to allow the production of devices in the form of films, fibers, matrixes, composites or even porosity-controlled solids. The materials thus created must present precise and useable physical, mechanical or chemical properties. In the case of smart materials these properties must be organized each in relation to the others and coupled between them in an interactively controlled manner. 

Essentially, wood is a complex fiber matrix composite material formed of natural polymers in which the fiber framework consists of crystalline cellulose micro-fibrils, 2-5 nm diameter. The matrix between the micro-fibrils is composed mostly of hemicellulose, and lignin provides the strengthening material that reinforces the surrounding cell wail. Typical contents for the biopolymers of hardwoods are 42-50% cellulose, 19-25% hemicellulose and 16-25% lignin. 

Polyester resins for applications in contact with chemicals are almost exclusively fiber-reinforced types. The following explanations will consider the influence of the resin as well as the influence of these fiber-matrix composites. 

Figure 12.37 A sketch shows the sample preparation procedure of single iPP fiber/matrix composites. Li et al. [132]. Reproduced with permission of American Chemical Society.

Figure 1245 Optical micrographs of the iPP fiber/matrix composites prepared by introducing the same iPP fiber into molten iPP matrix with molecular weight (a) = 1.94 X 10 and (b) = 4.46 X 10 at 180°CandsubsequentlyisothermaUy crystallized at 138 °C for2h. Sunetal.

Figure 1246 Polarized optical micrographs of an iPP fiber/matrix composite crystallized isothermaUy at 116 °C for 30 min. The temperature of fiber introduction was 173 °C. (a) As-prepared sample and (b) after melting of the ff-iPP crystals at 158 °C. Sun et al. [134]. Reproduced with permission of American Chemical Society.

---