Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Thermodynamic properties interface

Two simulation methods—Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics—allow calculation of the density profile and pressure difference of Eq. III-44 across the vapor-liquid interface [64, 65]. In the former method, the initial system consists of N molecules in assumed positions. An intermolecule potential function is chosen, such as the Lennard-Jones potential, and the positions are randomly varied until the energy of the system is at a minimum. The resulting configuration is taken to be the equilibrium one. In the molecular dynamics approach, the N molecules are given initial positions and velocities and the equations of motion are solved to follow the ensuing collisions until the set shows constant time-average thermodynamic properties. Both methods are computer intensive yet widely used. [Pg.63]

Data on the gas-liquid or vapor-liquid equilibrium for the system at hand. If absorption, stripping, and distillation operations are considered equilibrium-limited processes, which is the usual approach, these data are critical for determining the maximum possible separation. In some cases, the operations are are considerea rate-based (see Sec. 13) but require knowledge of eqmlibrium at the phase interface. Other data required include physical properties such as viscosity and density and thermodynamic properties such as enthalpy. Section 2 deals with sources of such data. [Pg.1350]

By far the most common methods of studying aqueous interfaces by simulations are the Metropolis Monte Carlo (MC) technique and the classical molecular dynamics (MD) techniques. They will not be described here in detail, because several excellent textbooks and proceedings volumes (e.g., [2-8]) on the subject are available. In brief, the stochastic MC technique generates microscopic configurations of the system in the canonical (NYT) ensemble the deterministic MD method solves Newton s equations of motion and generates a time-correlated sequence of configurations in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble. Structural and thermodynamic properties are accessible by both methods the MD method provides additional information about the microscopic dynamics of the system. [Pg.349]

The aim of the present study is precisely to investigate the thermodynamical properties of an interface when the bulk transition is of first order. We will consider the case of a binary alloy on the fee lattice which orders according to the LI2 (CuaAu type) structure. [Pg.122]

Since the equations of state of the system are summarized by the curves in Figure 2, all interesting thermodynamic properties of the interface will have a simple representation in such a diagram. We shall consider the free energy of formation of a single charged surface and the interaction free energy due to the overlap of two identical planar double layers. [Pg.106]

Coulombic, van der Waals, entropic and osmotic forces are coupled in a nontrivial way and give rise to important charge regulation in polyelectrolyte systems. The salt concentration is also an important factor to define the structure and thermodynamic properties of polyelectrolyte solutions. In weak polyelectrolytes the ionization equilibrium is also coupled to these interactions and thus the pKof ionizable groups depends on the organization of the interface and differs from that for the isolated molecule. [Pg.57]

A critical part of the calculations is to calculate the tie-line at the interface corresponding to local equilibrium, and Enomoto (1992) used the central atoms model to predict the thermodynamic properties of a and 7. Some assumptions were made concerning the growth mode and the calculation of this tie-line is dependent on whether growth occurred under the following alternative conditions ... [Pg.450]

At the same time, it is the position of the Fredox level that determines the thermodynamic properties of a semiconductor-solution interface. In particular, proceeding from the equilibrium condition F = Fredox, one may write the condition of an electrochemical reaction in the following form (Gerischer, 1977c) ... [Pg.262]

Antipova, A.S., Semenova, M.G., Belyakova, L.E. (1999). Effect of sucrose on the thermodynamic properties of ovalbumin and sodium caseinate in bulk solution and at air-water interface. Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces, 12, 261-270. [Pg.219]

Substitution of Equations (36) and (37) into Equation (35) generates a complicated differential equation with a solution that relates the shape of an axially symmetrical interface to y. In principle, then, Equation (35) permits us to understand the shapes assumed by mobile interfaces and suggests that y might be measurable through a study of these shapes. We do not pursue this any further at this point, but return to the question of the shape of deformable surfaces in Section 6.8b. In the next section we examine another consequence of the fact that curved surfaces experience an extra pressure because of the tension in the surface. We know from experience that many thermodynamic phenomena are pressure sensitive. Next we examine the effecl of the increment in pressure small particles experience due to surface curvature on their thermodynamic properties. [Pg.261]

In Chapter 3 we described the structure of interfaces and in the previous section we described their thermodynamic properties. In the following, we will discuss the kinetics of interfaces. However, kinetic effects due to interface energies (eg., Ostwald ripening) are treated in Chapter 12 on phase transformations, whereas Chapter 14 is devoted to the influence of elasticity on the kinetics. As such, we will concentrate here on the basic kinetics of interface reactions. Stationary, immobile phase boundaries in solids (e.g., A/B, A/AX, AX/AY, etc.) may be compared to two-phase heterogeneous systems of which one phase is a liquid. Their kinetics have been extensively studied in electrochemistry and we shall make use of the concepts developed in that subject. For electrodes in dynamic equilibrium, we know that charged atomic particles are continuously crossing the boundary in both directions. This transfer is thermally activated. At the stationary equilibrium boundary, the opposite fluxes of both electrons and ions are necessarily equal. Figure 10-7 shows this situation schematically for two different crystals bounded by the (b) interface. This was already presented in Section 4.5 and we continue that preliminary discussion now in more detail. [Pg.244]

We now want to consider the effect of multiple components on the thermodynamic properties of the interface. We will first generalize to any number of solutes, but eventually we will limit our treatment to binary mixtures. [Pg.62]

Surface effects are negligible in many cases. However, when the surface-to-volume ratio of the system is large, surface effects may become appreciable. Moreover, there are phenomena associated with surfaces that are important in themselves. Only an introduction to the thermodynamics of surfaces can be given here, and the discussion is limited to fluid phases and the surfaces between such phases. Thus, consideration of solid-fluid interfaces are omitted, although the basic equations that are developed are applicable to such interfaces provided that the specific face of the crystal is designated. Also, the thermodynamic properties of films are omitted. [Pg.359]

It was already noted in early publications [165,184] (similar procedure is traditionally used in the QCA for describing various properties thermodynamic, phase interfaces, diffusion processes, kinetics of reactions) that for R — 1 the dimension of a system of equations can be lowered sharply if one goes over from equations in the variables 0,- and Oy, to new variables Xt with the aid of the following relation ... [Pg.449]

This does not mean, however, that the rules based on those assumptions must necessarily be incorrect. Though, for example, the original derivation of Evans equation is definitely incorrect, the final equation itself is quite correct (see Chapter 1). Further work is required to check the applicability of the proposed rules to other binary systems of different chemical nature. Also, much efforts are to be undertaken to find out other relationships between the thermodynamic properties of chemical compounds and the sequence of occurrence of their layers at the A-B interface. This sequence seems to be more dependent on the partial, rather than on the integral values of thermodynamic potentials. [Pg.151]

In this overview, the direct measurement of the rate of a molecule crossing the octanol-water interface is presented as an appropriate extension to measurement of Pow, a thermodynamic property. In addition to reviewing previous work, we include results from a wide variety of chemical... [Pg.162]

The Physical Methods of Chemistiy is a multivolume series that includes Components of Scientific Instruments (Vol. I), Electrochemical Methods (Vol. II), Determination of Chemical Composition and Molecular Structure (Vol. Ill), Microscopy (Vol. IV), Determination of Structural Features of Crystalline and Amphorous Solids (Vol. V), Determination of Thermodynamic Properties (Vol. VI), Determination of Elastic and Mechanical Properties (Vol. VII), Determination of Electronic and Optical Properties (Vol. VIII), Investigations of Surfaces and Interfaces (Vol. IX), and Supplement and Cumulative Index (Vol. X). [Pg.702]

We conclude that the proximal radial distribution function (Fig. 1.11) provides an effective deblurring of this interfacial profile (Fig. 1.9), and the deblurred structure is similar to that structure known from small molecule hydration results. The subtle differences of the ( ) for carbon-(water)hydrogen exhibited in Fig. 1.11 suggest how the thermodynamic properties of this interface, fully addressed, can differ from those obtained by simple analogy from a small molecular solute like methane such distinctions should be kept in mind together to form a correct physical understanding of these systems. [Pg.22]

The factor introduces into equation (9) an explicit dependence of m on the concentration of species 1 in the gas adjacent to the interface [see equation (B-78)]. Except for this difference, equation (9) contains the same kinds of parameters as does equation (6), since the coefficient a can be analyzed from the viewpoint of transition-state theory. Although a may depend in general on and the pressure and composition of the gas at the interface, a reasonable hypothesis, which enables us to express a in terms of kinetic parameters already introduced and thermodynamic properties of species 1, is that a is independent of the pressure and composition of the gas [a = a(7])]. Under this condition, at constant 7] the last term in equation (9) is proportional to the concentration j and the first term on the right-hand side of equation (9) is independent of. Therefore, by increasing the concentration (or partial pressure) of species 1 in the gas, the surface equilibrium condition for species 1—m = 0—can be reached. If Pi e(T denotes the equilibrium partial pressure of species 1 at temperature 7], then when m = 0, equation (9) reduces to... [Pg.236]


See other pages where Thermodynamic properties interface is mentioned: [Pg.61]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.804]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.33]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.969 ]




SEARCH



Interface properties

Interface thermodynamics

© 2024 chempedia.info