Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interface/surface properties opportunities

Monolayers of surfactants at the air-water interface provide an unparalleled opportunity to study energy changes due to differences in orientation of the surfactant molecules as they are packed within various areas on the surface. The work reviewed here, from a small number of studies that have been widely scattered through the literature, shows that the surface properties of monolayers are quite sensitive to stereochemistry. [Pg.253]

Most recently, significant research efforts have been focused on materials compatibility and adhesion at the zeoHte/polymer interface of the mixed-matrix membranes in order to achieve enhanced separation property relative to their corresponding polymer membranes. Modification of the surface of the zeolite particles or modification of the polymer chains to improve the interfacial adhesion provide new opportunity for making successful zeolite/polymer mixed-matrix membranes with significantly improved separation performance. [Pg.339]

Why is it that insects like beetles can walk on water Why do the bristles of a brush immersed in water cling together as the brush is pulled out Phenomena such as these arise because of a special property of interfaces that separate two phases. Let us consider another example first. Everyone has had the experience of pouring more beverage into a cup or glass than that container could hold. In addition to the spills this causes, such an experience provides an opportunity to observe surface tension. Most liquids can be added to a vessel until the liquid surface bulges above the rim of the container. The liquid behaves as if it had a skin that prevents it —up to a point —from overflowing. Stated technically, a contractile force, which tends to shrink the surface, operates around the perimeter of the surface. This is what we mean when we talk about the surface tension of a liquid. All phase boundaries behave this way, not just liquid surfaces however, the evidence for this is more apparent for deformable liquid surfaces. [Pg.248]

Surfaces and interfaces As the dimensions of structures become smaller, their ratio of surface-to-volume increases. Molecules are essentially all surface, as are the smallest nanostructures. The ability to make materials with high ratios of surface-to-volume by building them from nanostructures is an important opportunity for surface science and technology. The surface is an extremely interesting state of matter it determines many properties crucial... [Pg.221]

The ability to form patterned SAMs allows us to engineer the interfacial properties of a surface with one more degree of freedom, in addition to the flexibility offered by SAMs themselves. It provides immediate opportunities to prepare systems in which structures can be controlled in the plane of the interface. SAMs can be used to control the nucleation, adsorption, and wetting of other materials, and thus patterned SAMs can be used as templates to direct and control the assemblies of other materials to form useful structures they ean also be used as patterned resists in directing the dissolution of the substrate to form patterns and structures in the underlying substrates (Au, Si02 and Si) [95]. [Pg.21]

Optical properties of copper nanoparticles are quite remarkable because the energy of the dipolar mode of surface collective electron plasma oscillations (surface plasmon resonance or SPR) coincides with the onset of interband transition. Therefore, optical spectroscopy gives an opportunity to study the particle-size dependence of both valence and conduction electrons. The intrinsic size effect in metal nanoparticles, caused by size and interface damping of the SPR, is revealed experimentally by two prominent effects a red shift of the surface plasmon band and its broadening. [Pg.324]

Let us consider the effect of surfactant on the properties of the polymer boundary layers. Octyltrimethylammonium bromide (OTMAB) integrated into the compound was used as surfactant. Figure 2.23 shows that surfactant that has little effect on the cure rate of the epoxy compound in the bulk does increase the rate and the degree of conversion in the boundary layer on the surface of KRS-5. The adsorption of surfactant on the interface seems to remove the selective sorption of the epoxy resin, which excludes the opportunity for formation of the undercured boundary layer and results in increase of the adhesion strength (Table 2.8). [Pg.71]


See other pages where Interface/surface properties opportunities is mentioned: [Pg.246]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.87]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 , Pg.12 ]




SEARCH



Interface properties

Opportunism

Surface interface

© 2024 chempedia.info