Insurance rating system

Banks are not in business to take risks. They rent money and do everything they can to insure the return of their principal as well as the interest. Elaborate rating systems have been developed to measure each company s ability to repay its loans. One criterion is the debt to equity ratio. The higher the debt the more risk in a loan, and the higher the interest rate. 

Costs in Safety. The hazards present are a direct function of the fire insurance rates that can be obtained. A decrease of the hazards may effect important savings in the insurance items of the overhead costs. In this connection, the cost of a complete automatic sprinkler system may be entirely defrayed by the resulting decrease in fire insurance rates. Such protective schemes and equipment are not so easily paid for, but they frequently can be justified on economic grounds alone. Hazards also involve loss of production and men .s. services as well as impairment of product quality. Reduction of hazards thus becomes an economic problem. 

The workers compensation experience modification rating system is based on actuarial science. In an undated publication titled The ABC S of Experience Rating issued by the National Council on Compensation Insurance, these statements appear. 

Solvent recovery and recycle has limitations in that it still depends on solvents and requires expensive equipment. If complex mixtures of solvents are used, they must be separated and cleaned up before reuse. Workers may still be exposed to hazards, and insurance rates where solvents are involved are increasing. One-hundred percent solids systems may be the wave of the future, however, at this time the technology is limited. Current hot melt systems have thermal stability problems which inhibit their use in various applications. And though problems and disadvantages remain to be solved with water-based systems, the current technology is practical and presents advantages the other alternatives cannot achieve at this time. 

One such method for determining workers compensation premiums is through the use of the experience modification rating (EMR). The EMR is determined by the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI) or other insurance rating groups. The EMR system rates companies based upon the type of work they are engaged in and their past loss history. Using actuary science, the insurer estimates what a firm s losses should have been over a period of time and compares them to their actual losses (Adams 1997,33). 

Factory Mutual Research Corporation (FM) is also an insurance rating company (for profit). FM rates and approves heater systems, other components, and assembled machinery for use in industrial applications insured by the Factory Mutual Insurance Company. Unlike UL, FM approves products for use in facilities insured by their parent company (and other insurance companies). 

For a detailed explanation of the experience rating system provided by the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc., go to http // www.ncci.com/Documents/ABCs Exp Rating 2012.pdf That will bring up a downloadable booklet titled ABCs of Experience Rating—2012 Edition. Excerpts from that publication, duplicated with permission, follow. 

Yucemen MS (2013) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake insurance rates for buildings. In Tesfamariam S, Goda K (eds) Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 787-814... 

The risk homeostatic approach implies that safety policy can increase traffic safety through insurance rates, traffic fines, driver education and other measures which influence the benefits and costs of safety as perceived by roadway users. For detail on such incentive systems see Gerald J. S. Wilde and Paul A. Murdoch. Incentive Systems for Accident-Free and Violation-Free Driving in the General Population. Ergonomics 25,10 (1982) 879-890. 

The assessment should also seek out systems for measuring performance. Remember that there is a need to measure both PSM and ESH performance, as well as the effectiveness of the processes in place. It is likely that at least some PSM and ESH performance measures will be in place, such as injury rates, number of incident investigations, regulatory infractions and insurance premiums. Your questions should probe for issues that managers track, but perhaps only informally, that could provide new measures of performance. 

Generally as system size increases the impeller flow per fixed power input will increase faster than will the turbulence of the system. Even the same degree of turbulence is no insurance that the rates of mixing, mass transfer. 

The selected design Fj = 17 gives the number of holes to operate at these conditions. Note that the values of 1223 and 1410 holes for the top and bottom respectively indicated operations somewhat closer to the tower maximum than to the weep point. This usually insures as good an efficiency as is obtainable for a given system. It may limit the flexibility of the tower, since there will not be enough holes to operate down to the weep point at the given design flow rates. 

Estimates based on European data are more scarce, and present other problems. In universal public insurance systems, in which financing is not based on premiums, there is no interpersonal (intra-group) variability in the drag copayment rates, or if there is it is very small. Therefore, temporal data are used to quantify the reactions of demand to normative changes in co-payment rates. The problem here is that such changes have occurred on very few occasions, and concurrently with other sources of variation in demand. 

The TGA system was a Perkin-Elmer TGS-2 thermobalance with System 4 controller. Sample mass was 2 to 4 mgs with a N2 flow of 30 cc/min. Samples were initially held at 110°C for 10 minutes to remove moisture and residual air, then heated at a rate of 150°C/min to the desired temperature set by the controller. TGA data from the initial four minutes once the target pyrolysis temperature was reached was not used to calculate rate constants in order to avoid temperature lag complications. Reaction temperature remained steady and was within 2°C of the desired temperature. The actual observed pyrolysis temperature was used to calculate activation parameters. The dimensionless "weight/mass" Me was calculated using Equation 1. Instead of calculating Mr by extrapolation of the isothermal plot to infinity, Mr was determined by heating each sample/additive to 550°C under N2. This method was used because cellulose TGA rates have been shown to follow Arrhenius plots (4,8,10-12,15,16,19,23,26,31). Thus, Mr at infinity should be the same regardless of the isothermal pyrolysis temperature. A few duplicate runs were made to insure that the results were reproducible and not affected by sample size and/or mass. The Me values were calculated at 4-minute intervals to give 14 data points per run. These values were then used to... 

---