Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Influence sample preparation

High speed analysis requirements which influence sample preparation demands (being the rate determining step of the analytical process). [Pg.54]

Powder diffraction patterns have three main features that can be measured t5 -spacings, peak intensities, and peak shapes. Because these patterns ate a characteristic fingerprint for each crystalline phase, a computer can quickly compare the measured pattern with a standard pattern from its database and recommend the best match. Whereas the measurement of t5 -spacings is quite straightforward, the determination of peak intensities can be influenced by sample preparation. Any preferred orientation, or presence of several larger crystals in the sample, makes the interpretation of the intensity data difficult. [Pg.4]

Investigated is the influence of the purity degree and concentration of sulfuric acid used for samples dissolution, on the analysis precision. Chosen are optimum conditions of sample preparation for the analysis excluding loss of Ce(IV) due to its interaction with organic impurities-reducers present in sulfuric acid. The photometric technique for Ce(IV) 0.002 - 0.1 % determination in alkaline and rare-earth borates is worked out. The technique based on o-tolidine oxidation by Ce(IV). The relative standard deviation is 0.02-0.1. [Pg.198]

THE COMBINED CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFLUENCES IN SAMPLE PREPARATION... [Pg.251]

Analysis of soils is an important task in the environmental researches. Reliability of ICP-MS results of soil analysis mainly depends on chemical sampling. Recently microwave systems are widely used for preparation of different samples. Influence of microwave radiation on sample ensures a complete decomposition of sample, greatly increases the mineralization, and allows possible losses of volatile elements to be minimized. In the given study to intensify decomposition of soils we applied the microwave sample preparation system MULTIWAVE (Anton Paar, Austria and Perkin-Elmer, USA) equipped with rotor from 6 autoclaves with TEM reaction chambers of 50 ml volume. [Pg.287]

Minerals generally present difficult problems in chemical analysis, and these problems grow more serious when the elements being determined are as difficult to separate as are those named above. The time and effort that x-ray emission spectrography can save are therefore great, but there are obstacles to be surmounted. Among these are (1) Absorption and enhancement effects are often serious. (2) The element of interest may be present at low concentration in a matrix that is unknown and variable. (3) Satisfactory standards are not always easy to obtain. (4) Simple equipment sometimes does not resolve important analytical lines- completely. (5) Sample preparation and particle size often influence the intensities of analytical lines Class II deviations (7.8) can be particularly serious with minerals. [Pg.199]

Industrial analytical laboratories search for methodologies that allow high quality analysis with enhanced sensitivity, short overall analysis times through significant reductions in sample preparation, reduced cost per analysis through fewer man-hours per sample, reduced solvent usage and disposal costs, and minimisation of errors due to analyte loss and contamination during evaporation. The experience and criticism of analysts influence the economical aspects of analysis methods very substantially. [Pg.13]

Principles and Characteristics Supercritical fluid extraction uses the principles of traditional LSE. Recently SFE has become a much studied means of analytical sample preparation, particularly for the removal of analytes of interest from solid matrices prior to chromatography. SFE has also been evaluated for its potential for extraction of in-polymer additives. In SFE three interrelated factors, solubility, diffusion and matrix, influence recovery. For successful extraction, the solute must be sufficiently soluble in the SCF. The timescale for diffusion/transport depends on the shape and dimensions of the matrix particles. Mass transfer from the polymer surface to the SCF extractant is very fast because of the high diffusivity in SCFs and the layer of stagnant SCF around the solid particles is very thin. Therefore, the rate-limiting step in SFE is either... [Pg.85]

Gas chromatographic analysis starts with introduction of the sample on the column, with or without sample preparation steps. The choice of inlet system will be dictated primarily by the characteristics of the sample after any preparation steps outside the inlet. Clearly, sample preparation has a profound influence on the choice of injection technique. For example, analysts may skip the solvent evaporation step after extraction by eliminating solvent in the inlet with splitless transfer into the column. Sample introduction techniques are essentially of two types conventional and programmed temperature sample introduction. Vogt et al. [89] first described the latter in 1979. Injection of samples, which... [Pg.187]

Parameters influencing the performance of headspace methods include sample preparation, sample temperature, equilibration time, carrier gas pressure, pressurisa-tion time, sampling time and transfer line temperature. For validation of headspace instrumentation, see Kolb and Ettre [207],... [Pg.203]

Recovery procedures have traditionally involved some form of solvent, gas or heat extraction from the bulk sample matrix. Some of these lend themselves to precolumn hyphenation (e.g. SFE, TD, Py, HS), as opposed to others (e.g. Soxhlet, ultrasonics). Extraction of additives should not be considered as an isolated step, because it may strongly influence the subsequent chromatographic separation. The success of an analysis may very often depend more on the extraction procedure than on the chromatographic separation. In hyphenation there should be compatibility between the sample preparation and subsequent chromatographic analysis. [Pg.428]

Molecular orientation and the testing direction strongly influence the observed modulus of a polymer sample. Fibers are typically highly oriented and exhibit much higher modulus values than non-oriented samples prepared from the same polymer. In the case of films, we typically observe anisotropy a film exhibits a range of modulus values depending upon the testing direction. [Pg.161]

TITRATIONS FOR COMPARISON OF METHODS. The automated photometric and turbidimetric methods were compared using 30 cm3 samples of surfactant solution containing a nominal 20 mol SDBS to give an equivalence volume of 5 cm3. The effect of salinity on the titrations was studied using samples prepared containing sodium chloride concentrations of 0.0, 0.14, 0.70 and 1.46 wt%. The influence of the choice of filter (580 or 620 nm) was also investigated. [Pg.264]

Although ribosomal proteins are readily observed as in Figures 13.7 and 13.8 altered matrix conditions can alter the relative ionization of bacterial whole-cell compounds. A systematic analysis involving laser power/fluence and sample preparation conditions reveals that if the concentrated trifluo-roacetic acid is added and the laser power increased above optimal conditions, ionization of bacterial surface compounds can be enhanced. Figure 13.9 is the resulting 9.4 T MALDI-FTMS, seen are both the Braun s lipoprotein56,57 and the Murein lipoprotein. Both of these compounds are complex combinations of hydrocarbon lipids attached to a protein base. This is the first MALDI-FTMS observation of surface proteins desorbed directly from whole cells by influencing ionization conditions. [Pg.291]

Standardization of IHC/ICC has been a critical issue for more than three decades, especially with the advances in targeted therapy such as the development of trastuzumab (Herceptin) for advanced breast cancer.51 Nevertheless, standardization is a difficult issue because numerous factors may influence the consistency and reliability of immunostaining results, including fixatives, fixation time, AR, antibody clones, detection system, and interpretation (see Part II). In cytopathology, the situation is even worse due to its variable cell sample preparation techniques. Cytopreparation is. .. the foundation of cytomorphology. 52 We believe it is also the foundation of ICC. Therefore, standardization of ICC needs to start with uniform and reliable cytopreparation. [Pg.228]

It has to be stressed that selectivity of both separation methods depends on the matrix effect and the additives used, which can strongly influence chromatographic or electrophoretic equilibria. For that reason proper sample preparation plays a crucial role in the analytical process. [Pg.367]

The surface area ranges from 360 m2/g for the lower pH hydrothermal synthesis to 200 m2/g for the sample prepared at pH of 5.6. The pH also influences the lengths of the crystal-stacking domain along the long and short axes of the anisotropic particles. [Pg.371]

Example The choice of a matrix and optimized conditions of sample preparation have substantial influence on the appearance of MALDI spectra. Even when employing standard matrices such as CHCA or DHB, significant improvements can be achieved, e.g., by appropriate mixing of the two substances (Fig. 10.6). [71]... [Pg.419]


See other pages where Influence sample preparation is mentioned: [Pg.416]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.214]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.177 ]




SEARCH



Influence of sample preparation

Influence sampling

© 2024 chempedia.info