Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Immobilization processes

Self-organized materials with high surface area and pore size 3-25 nm was produced used templating and coassembly. The highly porous nature of the ordered combined with low adsorption and emission in the visible spectrum, facile diffusion makes them good candidate for optical and chemical sensor and provide new avenues for encapsulation/ immobilization processes and solve the problems mentioned above. [Pg.311]

As a general rule, the optimal immobilization method is found empirically by a process of trial and error, where the selectivity, activity, and operational stability of the enzyme after immobilization are taken into account. The immobilization process is very sensitive to different parameters and is treated as a kind of art [16]. [Pg.100]

Biological activity can be used in two ways for the bioremediation of metal-contaminated soils to immobilize the contaminants in situ or to remove them permanently from the soil matrix, depending on the properties of the reduced elements. Chromium and uranium are typical candidates for in situ immobilization processes. The bioreduction of Cr(VI) and Ur(VI) transforms highly soluble ions such as CrO and UO + to insoluble solid compounds, such as Cr(OH)3 and U02. The selenate anions SeO are also reduced to insoluble elemental selenium Se°. Bioprecipitation of heavy metals, such as Pb, Cd, and Zn, in the form of sulfides, is another in situ immobilization option that exploits the metabolic activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria without altering the valence state of metals. The removal of contaminants from the soil matrix is the most appropriate remediation strategy when bioreduction results in species that are more soluble compared to the initial oxidized element. This is the case for As(V) and Pu(IV), which are transformed to the more soluble As(III) and Pu(III) forms. This treatment option presupposes an installation for the efficient recovery and treatment of the aqueous phase containing the solubilized contaminants. [Pg.537]

Although the catalysts do not interfere with each other, the immobilization process resulted in higher yields and ees than with the raw enzyme the initial activity was over five times greater. Additionally, the biocomposite with enzyme was able to be recycled and maintained its activity, which demonstrates the utility of such an immobilization system for potential cascades with mutually interfering catalysts. [Pg.153]

The mobilization of arsenic from the tailings material seems to be a slow and continuos process attributed to reduction of iron phases. The seepage water of the middle source contains arsenite as well as arsenate in high concentrations and seems to be the only water source in contact with the tailings material. The concentrations of arsenic downstream are still high and the immobilization process by precipitation of iron hydroxide and coprecipitation or sorption of arsenic is incomplete. A reason for this may be the slow kinetics of the oxidation process and the transport of fine grained hydroxide particles. These particles are mobile and can bind the arsenic (mainly as arsenate) too. [Pg.70]

There have been many reports in which the immobilization method was covalent binding. In fact, many pH indicators used in above reports own at least one active amino or carboxyl group so that they can be covalently bound relatively easily to a solid substrate [165,166], Kostov et al. had discussed the immobilizing process of Congo red, neutral red and phenol... [Pg.152]

The final performance of the immobilized NA probes in the hybrid capture of target molecules (sensitivity and discrimination) is strongly dependent upon a number of parameters related to the immobilization process. These include (i) the chemical and physical properties of the surface, since they can influence nonspecific binding of target and nontarget (in mixtures) molecules (ii) the distance between the immobihzed NA probes and the solid surface and the orientation of the immobilized probe (iii) the density of the... [Pg.79]

Liu and Rauch (2003) of Motorola investigated oligonucleotide probe attachment onto polystyrene (PS), polycarbonate (PC), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and polypropylene (PP) plastic surfaces. They utilized three different immobilization processes SurModics surface modification solution (that allows attachment of adsorbed reactive groups to a surface by photoactivation of polymers at 254 nm). Pierce Reactive-Bind coating solution, and CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, a cationic detergent). Not surprisingly, the microarray performances on these plastics varied. [Pg.69]

Structures of immobilized rhodium complexes on the sihca support have been proposed on the basis of the data obtained from C, P and Si MAS-NMR. NMR spectra of the rhodium-modified solid materials confirmed that trimethylsiloxide ligand was removed from the rhodium coordination sphere during the immobilization process. Formation of a new covalent bond between the rhodium organo-metallic moiety and the silica support occurs, probably with evolution of trimethylsilanol, which is rapidly converted into disiloxane (Me3Si)20. The presence of this molecule in the solution obtained after the silica surface modification process was confirmed by GCMS analysis. [Pg.298]

The Fe " formed this way is mobile in the soil mantle and moves in (by diffusion) or together with (by convection) the soil water until it reaches aerobic environments where it is reoxidized and reprecipitated, often as Fe "oxides. Such processes lead to characteristic colour patterns in the soil mantle (redoximorphosis) which reflect the mobilizing/immobilizing processes (Schwertmann Fitzpatrick, 1992 Schwert-mann, 1993). The distances over which Fe " migrates range from between 10 -1 m within soil profiles to up to lO" " m in landscapes. [Pg.437]

Other possible classifications of flow-through sensors have been excluded from Fig. 2.4 because they are either of little consequence or dealt with in other sections below. Such is the case with the classification based on whether one or more of the active reaction ingredients (analyte, reagent, catalyst, reaction product) is immobilized temporarily or permanently on the active microzone. In addition, the immobilization process may involve one or several active components. [Pg.55]

According to researchers, furnaces for ceramic immobilization processes typically cost less than 1000 (D16044B, p. 155). According to the researchers, the SYNROC approach is only cost effective for large-scale applications (a large-scale application is assumed to produce 30-cm-diameter disks, each weighing approximately 30 kg). Cold press applications of the SYNROC process are more cost effective (D160429, pp. 255-256). No cost information is available for the Ceramification and SMITE processes. [Pg.448]

The MelDAS technology is a modified incineration process in which high temperatures destroy organic contaminants in soil and concentrate metals into fly ash. Details of the metals immobilization process can vary based on the specific application, but the essential steps are to combine the toxic-metal containing material with the appropriate amount of sorbent, to form this mixture into pellets or briquets placing the metal compounds into intimate contact with the sorbent, and to heat treat the pellets causing a reaction to form nonleachable metal compounds. The MelDAS process requires a sorbent. [Pg.863]

A large number of metJiods for immobilizing biomolecules on the surface of solid substrate have been proposed in the past few decades, in which the molecules are immobilized on a carrier using covalent bonds ( i, ionic bonds (2), physical adsorption (3), cross-linkage of the biomolecules (4), or by microencapsulation (5). Immobilizing techniques are indispensable to treat biomolecules in an experiment. The provision of an immobilization process is one of the most essential processing steps that are required in order to obtain practical biomolecule carriers such as... [Pg.259]

Rose, J., Moulin, I. et al. 2000. X-ray absorption spectroscopy study of immobilization processes for heavy metals in calcium silicate hydrates 1. Case of lead. Langmuir, 16, 9900-9906. [Pg.605]

Dewatering-. Dewatering the spent materials prior to immobilization improves the overall volume reduction and the compatibility of the waste with the immobilization process. Dewatering is generally accomplished by pressure, vacuum filtration, or centrifugation. [Pg.349]


See other pages where Immobilization processes is mentioned: [Pg.410]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.653]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.31 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.295 , Pg.296 , Pg.297 , Pg.298 , Pg.319 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.163 , Pg.164 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.405 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info