Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Noncovalent hybridization

Y. Belosludtsev, B. Iverson, S. Lemeshko, R. Eggers, R. Wiese, S. Lee, T. Powdrill, and M. Hogan, DNA microarrays based on noncovalent oligonucleotide attachment and hybridization in two dimensions. Anal. Biochem. 292, 250—256 (2001). [Pg.235]

One good example of noncovalent functionalization for subsequent hybridization is the use of benzyl alcohol (BA) [118]. n-n interactions between the aromatic ring of BA and the CNT sidewalls result in a good dispersibility in ethanol. Furthermore, BA offers a well-ordered and well-distributed functionalization [119] of hydroxyl groups on the sidewalls of the CNTs that can be used to hybridize the material with a large number of metal oxides using conventional chemical methods [60]. [Pg.19]

In general, the various synthesis strategies for nanocarbon hybrids can be categorized as ex situ and in situ techniques [3]. The ex situ ( building block ) approach involves the separate synthesis of the two components prior to their hybridization. One can rely on a plethora of scientific work to ensure good control of the component s dimensions (i.e. size, number of layers), morphology (i.e. spherical nanoparticles, nanowires) and functionalization. The components are then hybridized through covalent, noncovalent or electrostatic interactions. In contrast, the in situ approach is a one-step process that involves the synthesis of one of the components in the pres-... [Pg.126]

In this building-block approach, the components are synthesized separately and then hybridized via linking agents/methods that utilize covalent, noncovalent (van der Waals, n-n interactions, hydrogen bonding), or electrostatic interactions. The attachment of these building blocks often requires the chemical modification of at least one component to overcome the differences in surface chemistry. As a consequence deposition is often limited to the first layer. Excess nanoparticles can be removed by filtration or centrifugation. [Pg.127]

Noncovalent interactions such as van der Waals, hydrogen bonding, n-n stacking and electrostatic interactions have been widely used to hybridize pristine nanocarbons via ex situ approaches. The major advantage of this route is that the nanocarbons do not require modification prior to hybridization and their structure remains undisturbed, an important factor in many electronic applications. The strength of hybridization is weaker compared to covalent interactions but the synthetic process is generally simpler. Noncovalent attachment of small molecules to nanocarbons is often used to change the surface chemistry for subsequent ex situ or in situ hybridization. [Pg.129]

The majority of studies have used surfactants that wrap around nanocarbons via van der Waals interactions [37]. For instance, surfactants such as sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) are commonly used to disperse CNTs in aqueous solutions [38,39] while other surfactants, such as Pluorinc-123, are used to mechanically exfoliate graphene from graphite flakes (Fig. 5.4(a)) [40,41]. The polar head group of the surfactant can be used to further hybridize the nanocarbon via a range of covalent or noncovalent interactions [42]. For example, nanoparticles of Pt [43,44] and Pd [45] have been decorated onto SDS-wrapped MWCNTs. Similarly, Whitsitt et al. evaluated various surfactants for their ability to facilitate the deposition of Si02 NPs onto SWCNTs [46,47]. As an exam-... [Pg.129]

Fig. 5.17 Schematic of electropolymerization of CNT-polypyrrole hybrid via (a) ester linkage and (b) noncovalent pyrene linkage of pyrrole monomer with schematic of hybrid and SEM. Scale 200 nm. Reproduced with permission from [222], (2008) Elsevier. Fig. 5.17 Schematic of electropolymerization of CNT-polypyrrole hybrid via (a) ester linkage and (b) noncovalent pyrene linkage of pyrrole monomer with schematic of hybrid and SEM. Scale 200 nm. Reproduced with permission from [222], (2008) Elsevier.
Figure 3.9 Schematic representation of the typical noncovalent CNT functionalizations and the hybrid approach by using pyrene linkers. The figure also shows transmission electron images of SWNT modified with streptavidin labeled with 10 nm gold nanoparticles that were covalently coupled to pyrene linkers that were stacked on... Figure 3.9 Schematic representation of the typical noncovalent CNT functionalizations and the hybrid approach by using pyrene linkers. The figure also shows transmission electron images of SWNT modified with streptavidin labeled with 10 nm gold nanoparticles that were covalently coupled to pyrene linkers that were stacked on...
Hybrid hydrogels are usually referred to as hydrogel systems whose components are at least two distinct classes of molecules, for example, synthetic polymers and biological macromolecules, interconnected either covalently or noncovalently. They have been of particular interest because... [Pg.141]

Y. Zhao and D. G. Truhlar, Hybrid Meta Density Functional Theory Methods for Thermochemistry, Thermochemical Kinetics, and Noncovalent Interactions The MPW1B95 and MPWB1K Models and Comparative Assessments for Hydrogen Bonding and van der Waals Interactions, J. Phys. Chem. A 108 (2004), 6908. [Pg.232]

There are two general classes of imprinted polymers covalent and noncovalent MlPs. These two categories refer to the types of interactions between the functional monomer and the template in the prepolymerization complex. There are also hybrid MlPs that utilize a combination of covalent and noncovalent interactions in the preparation and rebinding events (Klein et al. 1999). Covalent MlPs utilize reversible covalent interactions to bind the template to the functional monomers. In contrast, noncovalent MlPs rely on weaker noncovalent functional monomer-template interactions. Each type has specific advantages and disadvantages with respect to sensing applications that will be addressed in subsequent sections. [Pg.398]

Hybrid MIPs. More recently, hybrid imprinting strategies have been developed that combine the advantages of both the covalent and noncovalent imprinting strategies (Whitcombe et al. 1995 Lubke et al. 2000). A recent example by Whitcombe s group is presented in Scheme 15.4 (Klein et al. 1999). The monomer-template prepolymerization complex is formed via a combination of covalent amide bonds and... [Pg.401]

In protein microarrays, capture molecules need to be immobilized in a functional state on a solid support. In principle, the format of the assay system does not limit the choice of appropriate surface chemistry. The same immobilization procedure can be applied for both planar and bead-based systems. Proteins can be immobilized on various surfaces (Fig. 1) (12). Two-dimensional polystyrene, polylysine, aminosilane, or aldehyde, epoxy- or thiol group-coated surfaces can be used to immobilize proteins via noncovalent or covalent attachment (13,14). Three-dimensional supports like nitrocellulose or hydrogel-coated surfaces enable the immobilization of the proteins in a network structure. Larger quantities of proteins can be immobilized and kept in a functional state. Affinity binding reagents such as protein A, G, and L can be used to immobilize antibodies (15), streptavidin is used for biotinylated proteins (16), chelate for His-tagged proteins (17, 18), anti-GST antibodies for GST fusion proteins (19), and oligonucleotides for cDNA or mRNA-protein hybrids (20). [Pg.201]

Molecular Self-Assembly. Reductive techniques, such as those used in the microelectronics industry, can produce structural features smaller than about 200 nm. The use of proximal probes and other nanomanipulative techniques can be considered to be a hybrid of the reductive lithographic techniques and die synthetic strategies of assembling functional nanostructures atom by atom, or molecule by molecule. The organization of nanostructures and devices by the self-assembly of the component atoms and molecules, a ubiquitous phenomenon in biological systems, forms die noncovalent synthetic approach to nanotechnology. [Pg.1047]

The avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method and the streptavidin-biotin (SAB) method are more sensitive than the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) method for histochemical techniques. The strong noncovalent attraction between biotin and avidin or streptavidin is exploited in many histochemical, immunohistochemical, and in situ hybridization... [Pg.98]


See other pages where Noncovalent hybridization is mentioned: [Pg.38]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.24]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.129 ]




SEARCH



Noncovalent

© 2024 chempedia.info