Humans substances carcinogenic

Chemicals which are probably carcinogenic in humans Substance Site affected (human)... 

While the standard combined chronic/cancer bioassay is helpful in hazard identification, it contributes in a more limited extent to hazard charactraization (i.e., the likelihood of causing adverse effects in humans). However, with some modification in the context of evolving integrated and hierarchical test strategies for groups of chemicals or individual substances, carcinogenicity bioassays have potential to contribute considerably additionally in this context. For example, as discussed... 

In addition to estimates of toxicity for individual solvents, fliere are lists which designate individual solvents as carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reproductively toxic. These lists contain the name of solvent with yes or no remark (or similar). If a solvent is not present on the list that does not endorse its benign nature because only materials diat have been tested are included in the lists. To further elaborate, materials are usually divided into toree categories substance known to cause effect on humans, substance which has caused responses in animal testing and given reasons to believe fliat similar reactions can be expected with human exposures, and substance which is suspected to cause responses based on experimental evidence. 

On the basis of these differences in species response it was concluded that phthalates do not pose a significant health hazard to humans. This view is home out by the EU Commission decision of July 25, 1990 which states that DEHP shall not be classified or labeled as a carcinogenic or an irritant substance (42). This has been reaffirmed in a comprehensive review (43) which concludes that "peroxisome proliferators constitute a discrete class of nongenotoxic rodent hepatocarcinogens and that the relevance of thek hepatocarcinogenic effects for human hazard assessment is considered to be negligible."... 

The food additive and GRAS rules appHcable to human foods generally apply to animal food ingredients. However, the Delaney clause s prohibition against carcinogenic substances in food additives was amended to permit carcinogenic chemicals to be fed to animals if the animals are not adversely affected and no residue can be found after slaughter. 

Vanillin has a low potential for acute and chronic toxicity, with a reported oral LD q in rats of 1580—3300 mg/kg. Dietary doses up to 20,000 ppm adrninistered to rats for two years resulted in no adverse toxicologic or carcinogenic effects. Vanillin is classified as a GRAS substance by EEMA. Consequently, at levels normally found in the human diet, vanillin would present no significant health or carcinogenic risk to humans. 

Toxic air pollutants are pollutants which are hazardous to human health or the environment but which are not specifically regulated by the CAA. These pollutants are typically carcinogens, mutagens, and teratogens. The CAAA of 1977 failed to result in substantial reductions in the emissions of these harmful substances. 

A1 - Confirmed Human Carcinogens. Substances, or substances associated with industrial process, recognized to have carcinogenic potential. 

A2 - Suspected human carcinogens. Chemical substances, or substances associated with industrial process, which are suspect of inducing cancer, based on their limited epidemiological evidence or demonstration of carcinogenesis in one or more animal species by appropriate methods. 

Carcinogen Any substance that has been shown to cause cancer in animals or humans. 

Toxicity alucs for carcinogenic effects also can be c.xprcsscd in terms of risk per unit concentration of the substance in the medium where human contact occurs. These measures, called unit risks, are calculated by dividing the slope factor by 70 kg and multiplying by the inhalation rate (20 m /day) or the water consumption rate (2 L/day), respecti ely, for risk associated with unit concentration in air or water. Where an absorption fraction less than 1.0 has been applied in deriving the slope factor, an additional conversion factor is necessary in the calculation of unit risk so that the unit risk will be on an administered dose basis. The standardized duration assumption for unit risks is understood to be continuous lifetime c.xposure. Hence, when there is no absorption conversion required ... 

Estimates of exposure levels posing minimal risk to humans (Minimal Risk Levels or MRLs) have been made for methyl parathion. An MRL is defined as an estimate of daily human exposure to a substance that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of adverse effects (noncarcinogenic) over a specified duration of exposure. MRLs are derived when reliable and sufficient data exist to identify the target organ(s) of effect or the most sensitive health effect(s) for a specific duration within a given route of exposure. MRLs are based on noncancerous health effects only and do not consider carcinogenic effects. MRLs can be derived for acute, intermediate, and chronic duration exposures for inhalation and oral routes. Appropriate methodology does not exist to develop MRLs for dermal exposure. 

Substance identified by sources other than TLV as a suspected or confirmed human carcinogen. 

The Chemical Substances Threshold Limit Values Committee classifies certain substances found in the occupational environment as either confirmed or suspected human carcinogens. The present listing of substances that have been identified as carcinogens takes two forms those for which a TLV has b n assigned and those for which environmental and exposure conditions have not been sufficiently defined to assign a TLV. Where a TLV has been assigned, it does not necessarily imply the existence of a biological threshold however, if exposures are controlled to this level, we would not expect to see a measurable increase in cancer incidence or mortality. 

A carcinogen is a substance which causes living tissues to become carcinomatous (to produce a malignant epithelial tumour). A mutagen is a chemical (or physical) agent whieh induees mutation in a human (or other) cell. 

Assessment of whether a chemical has the potential to cause adverse effects in humans arises usually from direct observation of an effect in animals or humans, such as the acute poisoning episodes that have occurred when potatoes contain high levels of glycoalkaloids. Epidemiological studies have also been used to infer a possible relationship between intake of a particular type of food, or constituent of that food, and the potential to cause an adverse effect. Such observations led to the characterisation of the aflatoxins as human carcinogens. However, natural toxic substances that occur in plant foods have often been identified through observations in animals, particularly farm animals. It was observations of adverse effects in farm animals that led to the further characterisation of the phytoestrogens and the mycotoxins. In other instances, the concern arises from the chemical similarity to other known toxins. 

---