Testing hierarchical

Chart showing hierarchical relationship among a technique, methods using that technique, and procedures and protocols for one method. (Abbreviations APHA = American Public Health Association, ASTM = American Society for Testing Materials, EPA = Environmental Protection Agency)... 

The forms comprise several sections (REE, CSP, COND, SAMP, and DATA) which follow the ordered way chiral separations are planned in an organized laboratory. The user first puts in the section REP the full information related to a given reference. Then, in CSP, SAMP and COND he or she will enter all the columns, samples and operating conditions. The separations are actually created in the last windows DATA, where each sample will be connected to all the columns which have been used, and each column will be connected to all the tested conditions in front of these conditions are entered the experimental results of each separation. This hierarchical structure thus enables a rapid and easy registration of several chiral separations for a given compound. 

Willett P, Winterman V, Bawden DJ. Implementation of non hierarchical cluster-analysis methods in chemical information-systems-selection of compounds for biological testing and clustering of substructure search output. Chem Inf Comp Sci 1986 26 109-18. 

An analysis is conducted of the predicted values for each team member s factorial table to determine the main effects and interactions that would result if the predicted values were real data The interpretations of main effects and interactions in this setting are explained in simple computational terms by the statistician In addition, each team member s results are represented in the form of a hierarchical tree so that further relationships among the test variables and the dependent variable can be graphically Illustrated The team statistician then discusses the statistical analysis and the hierarchical tree representation with each team scientist ... 

Each participant is permitted to revise the predictions until satisfied that both the factorial table (which focuses on combinations of the test variables) and the associated hierarchical tree (which focuses on the individual test variables) properly reflect the scientist s views concerning the anticipated relationships among the test conditions and the predicted values of the dependent measure ... 

Agenda 6 The last agenda consists of a team review and approval of a write-up that documents the final test design The documentation must Include the consensus factorial table, hierarchical tree, and mathematical model used to fit the predicted values In addition, the documentation must Include all basic arguments and considerations, even if these considerations do not appear in explicit form in the final design The specific reasons for excluding certain test... 

Hierarchical Trees. The hierarchical tree is constructed by the team statistician for each scientist in accord with the factorial table filled out by the scientist. To be useful for this purpose the tree must have the capability of exhibiting virtually any conceivable relation among the test factors and the dependent variable. It would be undesirable if the scientists were forced to constrain the anticipated relationships in any manner. 

Figure 1. Hierarchical tree showing predicited life as a function of test variables.

Another example of performance enhancement using a zeolite/TUD-1 catalyst is shown in n-hexane cracking using a series of zeolite-Beta-embedded TUD-1 catalysts (29) 20, 40 and 60 wt% zeolite Beta in Al-Si-TUD-1 (Si/Al = 150). These are compared to pure zeolite Beta, and to a physical mixture of 40% zeolite Beta and 60% Al-Si-TUD-1. These catalysts were tested in a fixed bed reactor, at atmospheric pressure, with constant residence time at 538°C. The pseudo-first-order rate constants are shown in Figure 41.8. Note that the zeohte-loaded catalysts were clearly superior to both the pure zeolite Beta catalyst and the zeohte-TUD-1 physical mixture. Again, this is evidence that catalyst performance benefits from a hierarchical pore stracture such as zeolite embedded in TUD-1. 

In view of catalytic potential applications, there is a need for a convenient means of characterization of the porosity of new catalyst materials in order to quickly target the potential industrial catalytic applications of the studied catalysts. The use of model test reactions is a characterization tool of first choice, since this method has been very successful with zeolites where it precisely reflects shape-selectivity effects imposed by the porous structure of tested materials. Adsorption of probe molecules is another attractive approach. Both types of approaches will be presented in this work. The methodology developed in this work on zeolites Beta, USY and silica-alumina may be appropriate for determination of accessible mesoporosity in other types of dealuminated zeolites as well as in hierarchical materials presenting combinations of various types of pores. 

Blashfield, R. K. (1976). Mixture model tests of cluster analysis Accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 377-388. 

To test whether the results are also statistically significant, a chi-square test for contingency is applied to the results obtained. However, as the values retrieved from the cases shown in Figure 43 are very small, the total number of different hierarchical control levels in that company, were added to that company s total. This led to the categorized results as shown in Table 18, upon which the chi-square test for contingency is applied. 

The bottleneck in utilizing Raman shifted rapidly from data acquisition to data interpretation. Visual differentiation works well when polymorph spectra are dramatically different or when reference samples are available for comparison, but is poorly suited for automation, for spectrally similar polymorphs, or when the form was previously unknown [231]. Spectral match techniques, such as are used in spectral libraries, help with automation, but can have trouble when the reference library is too small. Easily automated clustering techniques, such as hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) or PCA, group similar spectra and provide information on the degree of similarity within each group [223,230]. The techniques operate best on large data sets. As an alternative, researchers at Pfizer tested several different analysis of variance (ANOVA) techniques, along with descriptive statistics, to identify different polymorphs from measurements of Raman... 

SSDs are being routinely used for the display and interpretation of effects data (Parkhurst et al. 1996 Posthuma et al. 2002). An SSD for atrazine (shown in Figure 7.3) displays the typical S-shaped curve associated with many chemical dose-response relationships. Each point on the curve represents an LC50 for a particular species exposed to atrazine under standard toxicity test protocols. The SSD approach uses only a single statistically derived endpoint from each available toxicity test (e.g., the LC50 or EC50). In contrast, all data collected during any specific toxicity test can be used in a hierarchical model. The ability to use all available data to make inferential decisions is a marked improvement over the standard SSD effects distribution. 

A Bayesian hierarchical modeling framework was used to evaluate the effects data for each species and test endpoint (Figure 7.4). Hierarchical models reduce the effect of incomplete data sets, small numbers of tests, inconsistent information on effects among species, and other issues that lend uncertainty to the risk characterization results. 

The Concept of Hierarchical Testing in Primary and Follow-Up Assays 45... 

---