Heat release test methods

ISO 5660-1 [92] defines the cone calorimeter, which is probably the most widely used ol the rate of heat release test methods see Fig, 17. A horizontal 100 mm square specimen is exposed to a radiant heat flux of 10 to 100 kW m with a spark ignition. system. The effluent is drawn through a duct fitted with sensors for determining temperature, gas flow rate, and oxygen concentration. These data enable the rate of heat release to be determined using the oxygen consumption method. For most plastics, rubbers, and natural materials, the amount of heat produced per unit mass of oxygen consumed is approximately the... 

In an ideal situation the parameters used to define furniture should be ignition resistance and the rate of generation of heat, smoke and toxic gases. Tests to do this with actual or mock-up full sized furniture are not yet available as final specifications but the Nordtest (28) and NBS furniture calorimeters (29) represent scientific methods while room/ corridor rigs, typically UK DOE PSA FR5 and 6 of 1976 (5) (6) were originally used but are less satisfactory from a scientific point of view. The Californian (30) and Boston tests (31) for public area furniture are essentially simple room tests and are similar in principle to DOE, PSA, FR5 and 6 although the latter do not have pass/fail criteria. Bench scale rate of heat release tests include the NBS cone (29) which, with a code of practice represent a possible alternative but the rate of burning of... 

There are various standard methods available to assess the heat release rate. Widely used bench scale methods include the cone calorimeter which is based on oxygen consumption principle, such as ISO 5660 and ASTM E1354, and the Ohio State University (OSU) heat release apparatus (accepted for ASTM E906 Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials and Products) which measures heat release rate by the sensible enthalpy rise method. The large scale heat release tests using... 

Rate of Heat Release Test for Aircraft Cabin Materials. The Federal Aviation Administration requires (14 CFR 25.853) that large areas including interior ceiling and wall panels, partitions, galley structures, cabinets, and stowage compartments of commercial transport aircraft pass a rate of heat release test in addition to flammability and smoke tests. The rate of heat release apparatus (see Fig. 26) is a modified version of the ASTM E906, Standard Test Method For Heat And Visible Smoke Release Rates of Materials and Products (configuration A). 

Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Ratesfor Materials and Products, ASTM E906-83, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 1983 (updated periodically). 

A comparison of results for fire effluents from full scale and small scale fire tests has to be done in steps. A full scale fire is a developing event where temperature and major constitutions changes continously. A small scale fire test either take one instant of that developing stage and try model that or try to model the development in a smaller scale. On a priority one level rate of heat release, temperature, oxygen concentrations and the ratio of C02/C0 concentrations have to be similar for a comparison. The full scale fire experiments reaches a temperature of 900 C at the moment of flashover, while the small scale fire tests are reaching temperatures just above 400 °C for NT-FIRE 004 and the cone experiments. For the DIN 53436-method the temperature was set to 400 °C. 

Rate of heat release measurements have been attempted since the late 1950 s. A prominent example of instrument design for the direct measurement of the sensible enthalpy of combustion products is the Ohio State University (OSU) calorimeter. This has been standardized by ASTM and a test method employing this technique (ASTM-E-906) is part of a FAA specification for evaluation of large interior surface materials. 

Given the above observations it was essential in the present study that multiple test methods be used, representing evaluation of the effects of coatings on ignitability, flame spread, heat release, ease of extinction, and smoke. Samples should be commercially prepared and representative of materials commonly used in business machine applications. 

The versatility and accuracy of the oxygen consumption method in heat release measurement was demonstrated. The critical measurements include flow rates and species concentrations. Some assumptions need to be invoked about (a) heat release per unit oxygen consumed and (b) chemical expansion factor, when flow rate into the system is not known. Errors in these assumptions are acceptable. As shown, the oxygen consumption method can be applied successfully in a fire endurance test to obtain heat release rates. Heat release rates can be useful for evaluating the performance of assemblies and can provide measures of heat contribution by the assemblies. The implementation of the heat release rate measurement in fire endurance testing depends on the design of the furnace. If the furnace has a stack or duct system in which gas flow and species concentrations can be measured, the calorimetry method is feasible. The information obtained can be useful in understanding the fire environment in which assemblies are tested. 

ASTM Annual Book of Standards. Standard test method for heat and visible smoke release rates for materials and products. Test Method E 906-83. American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia, PA, 1985. 

TSR 15). The data (Tables IV-VI) suggest that this instrument provides a satisfactory method for measuring heat release, even in the horizontal mode. Furthermore, it can differentiate between those materials which are prone to release much heat rapidly and those which perform much better in terms of heat release. The reliability of smoke data is, in principle, lower than that of heat data. In order to establish some criteria, the Tables include SmkFct values at 5 min (in MW/m2), which will be compared with SmkFct and SmkPar values for the same materials tested in the Cone and with values of specific maximum smoke density measured in the NBS smoke chamber. 

Standard Method of Test for Heat Release Rates for Upholstered Furniture Components or Composites and Mattresses Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter, 1990. Ignitability of Exterior Wall Assemblies Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 1994. 

One of the sessions of the Symposium was largely devoted to presentation and discussion on the use of various experimental calorimetric methods for use in assessing possible hazards in chemical processing operations. The methods described covered a wide range of sample sizes and degrees of complexity Grewer, T. Adiabatic small-scale reaction test in Dewar, simple to operate. Janin, R. Measurements of heat release by DSC and of pressure development in sealed microcapsules. 

Headspace analysis (EPA 3810, 5021) also works well for analyzing volatile petroleum constituents in soil. In the test method, the soil is placed in a headspace vial and heated to drive out the volatiles from the sample into the headspace of the sample container. Salts can be added for more efficient release of the volatile compounds into the headspace. Similar to water headspace analysis, the soil headspace technique is useful when heavy oils and high analyte concentrations are present, which can severely contaminate purge-and-trap instrumentation. Detection limits are generally higher for headspace analysis than for purge-and-trap analysis. 

The open test method for tempered hybrid systems is the same as that given for vapour pressure systems in A2.4.3 above. However, in addition to measuring the test cell temperature, the rate of pressure rise in the closed containment vessel during tempering should also be measured. The rate of heat release per unit mass, q, can be obtained from measured dT/dt data, suitably corrected for thermal inertia (e.g. by using equation (A2.12)). Equation (A2.4) can be used to determine the rate of permanent gas evolution, QG. As the containment vessel provides a large heat sink, vapour is likely to condense, so that the rate of pressure rise is due only to the non-condensible gas., ... 

A reaction at the initial temperature changes the characteristics of an explosive mixture before the flame front and introduces an element of nonsteadiness into the process of propagation of the combustion wave. The method proposed in [1] to describe this effect consists in replacing the original non-steady problem by a quasi-steady one with adiabatically increasing initial temperature Ta(f) and an effective source of heat release which takes this increase into account. We test this method below by comparing it directly with the results of a numerical solution of the original non-steady problem. 

Studies are currently being conducted on smoke development and heat release rate from treated and untreated wood and wood products (52,56). An evaluation of the available treatment systems for wood shingles and shakes was completed using artificial weathering (11). A further development from this work was a new ASTM Standard Method D2898 (67,68) for testing durability of fire-retardant treatment of wood. 

The thermal combustion properties measured in the test are related to the flammability characteristics of the material.5155 For example, the heat release temperature from method A approximates the surface temperature at ignition (Section 14.3.2.1). The net calorific value from method B approximates the net heat of combustion measured in an oxygen bomb calorimeter. 

---