Functions in Reactors

The most generic distinction in the wide variety of membrane reactors can be made according to the possible functional roles of the membrane in the reactor, being controlled addition of reactants, separation of products from the reaction mixture and retention of the catalyst. Additionally, membrane processes can be divided based on the physical state of the retentate and permeate, respectively  

Based on a major division by membrane function in the reactor, a number of examples of membrane reactors are given below, illustrating the importance of the use of membranes for combining reaction and separation. Obviously, the list of membrane-based processes described here will not be exhaustive, although the following paragraphs will give an overview of the applications of membranes for chemical reactions. 

---

An in-reactor TPO may be defined as a reactor-produced polypropylene copolymer (PP-b-E/P), containing between 22 % and 55 % ethylene-propylene copolymer blocks. Small amounts of other comonomers, such as octene-1 or butene-1, may also be present so as to provide unique functionality. In-reactor propylene block copolymers containing less than 20 % ethylene are fairly hard and are usually classified as impact polypropylenes. Reactor-made polymers containing >50 % ethylene are soft and also have relatively poor elastomeric properties - these are classified as plastomers. 

In the previous discussion, it will perhaps have become apparent that the generalized Lagrange multiplier or adjoint function plays a significant role in the theory of optimal processes. Furthermore, it becomes as necessary to solve the adjoint or costate equations as the state equations if we are to analyze or synthesize optimal systems. We have also noted that the adjoint functions appear in the Lagrangian as a weighting given to the source density 5. In this section, we shall take up this idea to develop a physical interpretation of the adjoint function which should help us understand its role and perhaps find the adjoint equations, boundary conditions, and even solutions more easily. This physical interpretation as an importance function follows closely the interpretation given to the adjoint function in reactor theory 54). 

Process Characteristics in Transfer Functions In many cases, process charac teristics are expressed in the form of transfer functions. In the previous discussion, a reactor example was used to illustrate how a transfer function could be derived. Here, another system involving flow out of a tank, shown in Fig. 8-6, is considered. 

Process Unit or Batch Unit A process unit is a collection of processing equipment that can, at least at certain times, be operated in a manner completely independent from the remainder of the plant. A process unit normally provides a specific function in the production of a batch of product . For example, a process unit might be a reactor complete with all associated equipment (jacket, recirculation pump, reflux condenser, and so on). However, each feed preparation tank is usually a separate process unit. With this separation, preparation of the feed for the next batch can be started as soon as the feed tank is emptied for the current batch. 

The sum of squares as defined by Equation 7.8 is the general form for the objective function in nonlinear regression. Measurements are made. Models are postulated. Optimization techniques are used to adjust the model parameters so that the sum-of-squares is minimized. There is no requirement that the model represent a simple reactor such as a CSTR or isothermal PER. If necessary, the model could represent a nonisothermal PFR with variable physical properties. It could be one of the distributed parameter models in Chapters 8 or 9. The model... 

In order to use Eqs. (3) and (4) or the data given in Fig. 1, for the calculation of maximum turbulent fluctuation velocity the maximum energy dissipation e , must be known. With fully developed turbulence and defined reactor geometry, this is a fixed value and directly proportional to the mean mass-related power input = P/pV, so that the ratio ,/ can be described as an exclusive function of reactor geometry. In the following, therefore details will be provided on the calculation of power P and where available the geometric function ,/ . 

Figure 7.22. NH3 concentration as a function of reactor length in the synthesis of ammonia with a potassium-promoted iron catalyst. The exit concentration is 19 % and corresponds to...

The integration of sensing and other functions in a micro-flow system requires either monolithic, on-chip or hybrid, multi-scale approaches. Concerning the latter, Hessel and Lowe discuss the lack of compatibility of today s fluidic interfaces and report on a German project team developing a standard for micro-reactor interconnection [9, 10]. 

Before showing some examples of press releases and their content, we shall briefly shortly sum up all the information given. Most frequently the relationship of microreaction technology to the development of microelectronics is cited, suggesting a similar success story. Expectations are created that some day micro reactors will be mass fabricated at low cost in a similar way. In addition, it is believed that compactness can be achieved as for the integration of functions in the microelectronics world. In this context, often the vision of a shoebox-sized plant or a plant on a desk is given. 

Membrane reactors are known on the macro scale for combining reaction and separation, with additional profits for the whole process as compared with the same separate functions. Microstructured reactors with permeable membranes are used in the same way, e.g. to increase conversion above the equilibrium limit of sole reaction [8, 10, 11, 83]. One way to achieve this is by preparing thin membranes over the pores of a mesh, e.g. by thin-fihn deposition techniques, separating reactant and product streams [11]. 

Apart from chlorine (without or with carbon), carbon tetrachloride, phosgene, hydrogen chloride, and sulfur dioxide-chlorine mixtures, some of the metal chlorides can also function as chlorinating agents. The chlorinating action of metal chlorides is dramatically illustrated by the behavior of the silica lining in reactors used for the chlorination of titanium dioxide and beryllium dioxide. 

Catalyst nanoencapsulation is an excellent fit to the concepts of green chemistry [2] in the area of process intensification - enabling incompatible catalysts to function in the same reactor, thereby achieving what otherwise simply cannot be done. 

Molecular weight distribution function for the case where the length of the growth stage is short compared to the residence time in reactor. (Reprinted with permission from Chemical Reactor Theory, by K. G. Denbigh and J. C. R. Turner. Copyright 1971 by Cambridge University Press.)... 

The variance approach may also be used to determine n. From Illustration 11.2 the variance of the response data based on dimensionless time is 30609/(374.4)2, or 0.218. From equation 11.1.76 it is evident that n is 4.59. Thus the results of the two approaches are consistent. However, a comparison of the F(t) curves for n = 4 and n = 5 with the experimental data indicates that these approaches do not provide very good representations of the data. For the reactor network in question it is difficult to model the residence time distribution function in terms of a single parameter. This is one of the potential difficulties inherent in using such simple models of reactor behavior. For more advanced methods of modeling residence time effects, consult the review article by Levenspiel and Bischoff (3) and textbooks written by these authors (2, 4). 

The basis idea behind multi-environment models is that the mixture fraction at any location in the reactor can be approximated by a distribution function in the form of a sum of delta functions as follows ... 

Figure 9-1 Required vent area as a function of overpressure for two-phase flow. The vent area is decreased appreciably as the overpressure increases. Data from J. C. Leung, Simplified Vent Sizing Equations for Emergency Relief Requirements in Reactors and Storage Vessels, AICHE Journal (1986), 32(10).

In both cases the open-loop system is unstable but the location of the poles makes the second one more difficult to control. Sketching the root locus for the transfer function in Eq.(33), it is easy to verify that the system is conditionally stable. There is only a range of controller gain, K G K nn, K ,ax), leading to a closed-loop stable reactor. 

In this section we consider a CSTR with a very simple control system formed by two PI controllers. The first controller manipulates the outlet flow rate as a function of the volume in the tank reactor. A second PI controller manipulates the flow rate of cooling water to the jacket as a function of error in reactor s temperature. The control scheme is shown in Figure 12 where the manipulated variables are the inlet coolant flow rate Fj and the outlet flow rate F respectively. 

In this study the concentration profiles in the feed stream are delineated prior to operation, and these profiles are interpreted in terms of the flow rates of the two entering streams. Thus, the compounds that are fed at variable concentrations are each present in one vessel, and two peristaltic pumps flow these compounds to the reactor. The peristaltic pumps are computer controlled and change their flow rate according to the function in process. 

Such a relationship (and corresponding response surface) might represent magnetic field strength as a function of position in a plane parallel to the pole face of a magnet, or reaction yield as a function of reactor pressure and temperature for a chemical process. 

---